From: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ARM: mach-shmobile: r8a7779: Allow initialisation of GIC by DT
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:15:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <510BCE09.7050302@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130201105849.GB21191@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On 02/01/2013 04:58 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 12:34:10AM +0000, Simon Horman wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 09:11:19AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:32:13PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>>> Hi Simon,
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 01:50:49AM +0000, Simon Horman wrote:
>>>>> +
>>>>> + gic: interrupt-controller@f0001000 {
>>>>> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-gic";
>>>>> + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
>>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>>>
>>>> Why is #address-cells needed here (and without #size-cells)? I see it's in the
>>>> binding document example, but I can't figure out why.
>>>
>>> Its here because I copied the example.
>>> I will see about removing it from here.
>
> Rob, Grant, do either of you know if there's a reason for this that we've
> missed?
>
> The gic doesn't have any direct children, and this doesn't seem to be
> some decvicetree interrupt-controller magic.
If you look at of_irq_map_raw, there are cases that look at
#address-cells. Those appear to be only when you have an interrupt-map
though.
>
> If this is superfluous, how about the patch below?
The docs probably should state #addr-cells is only required with
interrupt-map.
>
> I took a quick look at arch/arm/boot/dts/. Some gic nodes don't have
> #address-cells, some have it but not #size-cells, and some have both. These
> should probably be cleaned up too.
Some boards are using interrupt-map, so they may need #address-cells. So
I'm inclined to leave things alone.
Rob
>
> [...]
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>
> ---->8----
>
> From dc734edb8040513785429c11e40a420870dc55a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 10:18:05 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] Docs: gic: remove #address-cells from example
>
> The gic has no child nodes, and so doesn't need #address-cells. Having
> the property defined in the example only serves as a source of
> confusion.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
> index 62eb8df..45b99ab 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
> @@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ Example:
> intc: interrupt-controller@fff11000 {
> compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-gic";
> #interrupt-cells = <3>;
> - #address-cells = <1>;
> interrupt-controller;
> reg = <0xfff11000 0x1000>,
> <0xfff10100 0x100>;
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: robherring2@gmail.com (Rob Herring)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] ARM: mach-shmobile: r8a7779: Allow initialisation of GIC by DT
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 08:15:37 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <510BCE09.7050302@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130201105849.GB21191@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On 02/01/2013 04:58 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 12:34:10AM +0000, Simon Horman wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 09:11:19AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:32:13PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>>> Hi Simon,
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 01:50:49AM +0000, Simon Horman wrote:
>>>>> +
>>>>> + gic: interrupt-controller at f0001000 {
>>>>> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-gic";
>>>>> + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
>>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>>>
>>>> Why is #address-cells needed here (and without #size-cells)? I see it's in the
>>>> binding document example, but I can't figure out why.
>>>
>>> Its here because I copied the example.
>>> I will see about removing it from here.
>
> Rob, Grant, do either of you know if there's a reason for this that we've
> missed?
>
> The gic doesn't have any direct children, and this doesn't seem to be
> some decvicetree interrupt-controller magic.
If you look at of_irq_map_raw, there are cases that look at
#address-cells. Those appear to be only when you have an interrupt-map
though.
>
> If this is superfluous, how about the patch below?
The docs probably should state #addr-cells is only required with
interrupt-map.
>
> I took a quick look at arch/arm/boot/dts/. Some gic nodes don't have
> #address-cells, some have it but not #size-cells, and some have both. These
> should probably be cleaned up too.
Some boards are using interrupt-map, so they may need #address-cells. So
I'm inclined to leave things alone.
Rob
>
> [...]
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>
> ---->8----
>
> From dc734edb8040513785429c11e40a420870dc55a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 10:18:05 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] Docs: gic: remove #address-cells from example
>
> The gic has no child nodes, and so doesn't need #address-cells. Having
> the property defined in the example only serves as a source of
> confusion.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
> index 62eb8df..45b99ab 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
> @@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ Example:
> intc: interrupt-controller at fff11000 {
> compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-gic";
> #interrupt-cells = <3>;
> - #address-cells = <1>;
> interrupt-controller;
> reg = <0xfff11000 0x1000>,
> <0xfff10100 0x100>;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-01 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-31 1:50 ARM: mach-shmobile: r8a7779, marzen: Reference DT implementation Simon Horman
2013-01-31 1:50 ` Simon Horman
2013-01-31 1:50 ` [PATCH 1/4] ARM: mach-shmobile: marzen: defconfig: use regulators by default Simon Horman
2013-01-31 1:50 ` Simon Horman
2013-01-31 1:50 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: mach-shmobile: r8a7779: Allow initialisation of GIC by DT Simon Horman
2013-01-31 1:50 ` Simon Horman
2013-01-31 12:32 ` Mark Rutland
2013-01-31 12:32 ` Mark Rutland
2013-02-01 0:11 ` Simon Horman
2013-02-01 0:11 ` Simon Horman
2013-02-01 0:34 ` Simon Horman
2013-02-01 0:34 ` Simon Horman
2013-02-01 1:47 ` Simon Horman
2013-02-01 1:47 ` Simon Horman
2013-02-01 4:39 ` Simon Horman
2013-02-01 4:39 ` Simon Horman
2013-02-01 11:31 ` Mark Rutland
2013-02-01 11:31 ` Mark Rutland
2013-02-01 10:58 ` Mark Rutland
2013-02-01 10:58 ` Mark Rutland
2013-02-01 14:15 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2013-02-01 14:15 ` Rob Herring
2013-02-04 17:37 ` Mark Rutland
2013-02-04 17:37 ` Mark Rutland
2013-02-16 21:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: mach-shmobile: r8a7779: add SATA support Sergei Shtylyov
2013-02-16 22:43 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-02-18 1:23 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2013-02-18 1:23 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2013-02-18 14:07 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-02-18 14:07 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-02-18 14:21 ` Magnus Damm
2013-02-18 14:21 ` Magnus Damm
2013-02-19 0:40 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2013-02-19 0:40 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2013-02-19 1:26 ` Simon Horman
2013-02-19 1:26 ` Simon Horman
2013-02-19 14:26 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-02-19 14:26 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-02-19 1:25 ` Simon Horman
2013-02-19 1:25 ` Simon Horman
2013-01-31 1:50 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: mach-shmobile: r8a7779: Minimal setup using DT Simon Horman
2013-01-31 1:50 ` Simon Horman
2013-02-18 9:36 ` Magnus Damm
2013-02-18 9:36 ` Magnus Damm
2013-02-18 11:37 ` Simon Horman
2013-02-18 11:37 ` Simon Horman
2013-02-18 12:14 ` Magnus Damm
2013-02-18 12:14 ` Magnus Damm
2013-02-18 12:37 ` Simon Horman
2013-02-18 12:37 ` Simon Horman
2013-02-18 12:22 ` Magnus Damm
2013-02-18 12:22 ` Magnus Damm
2013-02-18 12:37 ` Simon Horman
2013-02-18 12:37 ` Simon Horman
2013-02-18 19:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: mach-shmobile: r8a7779: add SATA support Sergei Shtylyov
2013-02-18 20:31 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-01-31 1:50 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: mach-shmobile: marzen: Reference DT implementation Simon Horman
2013-01-31 1:50 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=510BCE09.7050302@gmail.com \
--to=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.