From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] sctp: sctp_close: fix release of bindings for deferred call_rcu's
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:55:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <510BD74E.3010409@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1359729463-11833-1-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com>
On 02/01/2013 09:37 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>
> The underlying problem is that sctp_endpoint_destroy() hasn't been
> triggered yet while the next bind attempt is being done. It will be
> triggered eventually (but too late) by sctp_transport_destroy_rcu()
> after one RCU grace period:
>
> sctp_transport_destroy()
> sctp_transport_destroy_rcu() ----.
> sctp_association_put() [*] <--+--> sctp_packet_free()
> sctp_association_destroy() [...]
> sctp_endpoint_put() skb->destructor
> sctp_endpoint_destroy() sctp_wfree()
> sctp_bind_addr_free() sctp_association_put() [*]
>
> Thus, we move out the condition with sctp_association_put() as well as
> the sctp_packet_free() invocation and the issue can be solved. We also
> better free the SCTP chunks first before putting the ref of the association.
>
> With this patch, the example above (which simulates a similar scenario
> as in the implementation of this test case) and therefore also the test
> suite run successfully through. Tested by myself.
>
> Cc: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
-vlad
> ---
> net/sctp/transport.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/transport.c b/net/sctp/transport.c
> index 4e45bb6..ca5331c 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/transport.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/transport.c
> @@ -168,10 +168,6 @@ static void sctp_transport_destroy_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
> struct sctp_transport *transport;
>
> transport = container_of(head, struct sctp_transport, rcu);
> - if (transport->asoc)
> - sctp_association_put(transport->asoc);
> -
> - sctp_packet_free(&transport->packet);
>
> dst_release(transport->dst);
> kfree(transport);
> @@ -186,6 +182,11 @@ static void sctp_transport_destroy(struct sctp_transport *transport)
> SCTP_ASSERT(transport->dead, "Transport is not dead", return);
>
> call_rcu(&transport->rcu, sctp_transport_destroy_rcu);
> +
> + sctp_packet_free(&transport->packet);
> +
> + if (transport->asoc)
> + sctp_association_put(transport->asoc);
> }
>
> /* Start T3_rtx timer if it is not already running and update the heartbeat
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] sctp: sctp_close: fix release of bindings for deferred call_rcu's
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 09:55:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <510BD74E.3010409@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1359729463-11833-1-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com>
On 02/01/2013 09:37 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>
> The underlying problem is that sctp_endpoint_destroy() hasn't been
> triggered yet while the next bind attempt is being done. It will be
> triggered eventually (but too late) by sctp_transport_destroy_rcu()
> after one RCU grace period:
>
> sctp_transport_destroy()
> sctp_transport_destroy_rcu() ----.
> sctp_association_put() [*] <--+--> sctp_packet_free()
> sctp_association_destroy() [...]
> sctp_endpoint_put() skb->destructor
> sctp_endpoint_destroy() sctp_wfree()
> sctp_bind_addr_free() sctp_association_put() [*]
>
> Thus, we move out the condition with sctp_association_put() as well as
> the sctp_packet_free() invocation and the issue can be solved. We also
> better free the SCTP chunks first before putting the ref of the association.
>
> With this patch, the example above (which simulates a similar scenario
> as in the implementation of this test case) and therefore also the test
> suite run successfully through. Tested by myself.
>
> Cc: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
-vlad
> ---
> net/sctp/transport.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/transport.c b/net/sctp/transport.c
> index 4e45bb6..ca5331c 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/transport.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/transport.c
> @@ -168,10 +168,6 @@ static void sctp_transport_destroy_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
> struct sctp_transport *transport;
>
> transport = container_of(head, struct sctp_transport, rcu);
> - if (transport->asoc)
> - sctp_association_put(transport->asoc);
> -
> - sctp_packet_free(&transport->packet);
>
> dst_release(transport->dst);
> kfree(transport);
> @@ -186,6 +182,11 @@ static void sctp_transport_destroy(struct sctp_transport *transport)
> SCTP_ASSERT(transport->dead, "Transport is not dead", return);
>
> call_rcu(&transport->rcu, sctp_transport_destroy_rcu);
> +
> + sctp_packet_free(&transport->packet);
> +
> + if (transport->asoc)
> + sctp_association_put(transport->asoc);
> }
>
> /* Start T3_rtx timer if it is not already running and update the heartbeat
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-01 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-01 14:37 [PATCH net-next v3] sctp: sctp_close: fix release of bindings for deferred call_rcu's Daniel Borkmann
2013-02-01 14:37 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-02-01 14:55 ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
2013-02-01 14:55 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-02-04 12:10 ` Neil Horman
2013-02-04 12:10 ` Neil Horman
2013-02-04 18:23 ` David Miller
2013-02-04 18:23 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=510BD74E.3010409@gmail.com \
--to=vyasevich@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.