Re: [PATCHv4 0/7] zswap: compressed swap caching

[Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

On 02/03/2013 07:03 PM, Simon Jeons wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 09:13 -0600, Seth Jennings wrote:
>> On 01/31/2013 07:39 PM, Simon Jeons wrote:
>>> Hi Seth,
>>> On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 15:40 -0600, Seth Jennings wrote:
>> <snip>
>>>> Performance, Kernel Building:
>>>>
>>>> Setup
>>>> ========
>>>> Gentoo w/ kernel v3.7-rc7
>>>> Quad-core i5-2500 @ 3.3GHz
>>>> 512MB DDR3 1600MHz (limited with mem=512m on boot)
>>>> Filesystem and swap on 80GB HDD (about 58MB/s with hdparm -t)
>>>> majflt are major page faults reported by the time command
>>>> pswpin/out is the delta of pswpin/out from /proc/vmstat before and after
>>>> then make -jN
>>>>
>>>> Summary
>>>> ========
>>>> * Zswap reduces I/O and improves performance at all swap pressure levels.
>>>>
>>>> * Under heavy swaping at 24 threads, zswap reduced I/O by 76%, saving
>>>>   over 1.5GB of I/O, and cut runtime in half.
>>>
>>> How to get your benchmark?
>>
>> It's just kernel building.  So "make" :)
>>
>> I intentionally choose this workload so people wouldn't have to jump
>> through hoops to replicate the results.
> 
> Since there already have zram which can handle anonymous pages
> compression, why need zswap? What's the difference of design between
> zram and zswap? 

zram is implemented is a virtual block device.  It interfaces with the
block device layer, not the swap code.  In fact, zram can be used as a
generic compressed RAM disk, not only for compressed swap.  One can
think of it as a RAM disk + compression.

So zram is the actual swap device while zswap is a caching layer above
the swap device.  zswap is not the swap device itself like zram.

Hope this clears up the difference :)

Seth

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>