From: Stephen Warren <swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
To: Peter De Schrijver
<pdeschrijver-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>,
John Stultz <johnstul-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>,
linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource: tegra: move to of_clk_get
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 15:09:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <511031B5.4010900@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1359985230-11506-1-git-send-email-pdeschrijver-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
On 02/04/2013 06:40 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> The new clockframework introduced DT IDs for each clock. To be able to remove
> the device registrations, this driver needs to be updated to use the DT IDs.
> Note that the actual removal of the clk_register_clkdev() calls will be done
> in a later series.
This seems fine for 3.10, but I wonder about dependencies. Will there be
a bunch of other similar changes? I guess this patch is a dependency of
some changes to drivers/clk/tegra/ to remove the non-DT clock
registrations? It'd be good to get a clear idea of all the dependencies,
so we can see what's the best tree to apply the changes to; perhaps this
should go through the drivers/clk tree, or Tegra's clk driver changes
need to go through the Tegra tree again in 3.10?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] clocksource: tegra: move to of_clk_get
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 15:09:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <511031B5.4010900@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1359985230-11506-1-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
On 02/04/2013 06:40 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> The new clockframework introduced DT IDs for each clock. To be able to remove
> the device registrations, this driver needs to be updated to use the DT IDs.
> Note that the actual removal of the clk_register_clkdev() calls will be done
> in a later series.
This seems fine for 3.10, but I wonder about dependencies. Will there be
a bunch of other similar changes? I guess this patch is a dependency of
some changes to drivers/clk/tegra/ to remove the non-DT clock
registrations? It'd be good to get a clear idea of all the dependencies,
so we can see what's the best tree to apply the changes to; perhaps this
should go through the drivers/clk tree, or Tegra's clk driver changes
need to go through the Tegra tree again in 3.10?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource: tegra: move to of_clk_get
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 15:09:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <511031B5.4010900@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1359985230-11506-1-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
On 02/04/2013 06:40 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> The new clockframework introduced DT IDs for each clock. To be able to remove
> the device registrations, this driver needs to be updated to use the DT IDs.
> Note that the actual removal of the clk_register_clkdev() calls will be done
> in a later series.
This seems fine for 3.10, but I wonder about dependencies. Will there be
a bunch of other similar changes? I guess this patch is a dependency of
some changes to drivers/clk/tegra/ to remove the non-DT clock
registrations? It'd be good to get a clear idea of all the dependencies,
so we can see what's the best tree to apply the changes to; perhaps this
should go through the drivers/clk tree, or Tegra's clk driver changes
need to go through the Tegra tree again in 3.10?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-04 22:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-04 13:40 [PATCH] clocksource: tegra: move to of_clk_get Peter De Schrijver
2013-02-04 13:40 ` Peter De Schrijver
2013-02-04 13:40 ` Peter De Schrijver
[not found] ` <1359985230-11506-1-git-send-email-pdeschrijver-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-04 22:09 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2013-02-04 22:09 ` Stephen Warren
2013-02-04 22:09 ` Stephen Warren
2013-03-06 20:38 ` Stephen Warren
2013-03-06 20:38 ` Stephen Warren
2013-03-06 20:38 ` Stephen Warren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=511031B5.4010900@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren-3lzwwm7+weoh9zmkesr00q@public.gmane.org \
--cc=johnstul-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=pdeschrijver-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.