All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
To: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
Cc: horms@verge.net.au, mohanreddykv@gmail.com, pablo@netfilter.org,
	lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipvs: sctp: fix checksumming by adding hardware offload support
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 08:54:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5110C8BA.4080205@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1302042349350.1869@ja.ssi.bg>

On 02/05/2013 12:27 AM, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2013, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>
>> In our test lab, we have a simple SCTP client connecting to a SCTP
>> server via an IPVS load balancer. On some machines, load balancing
>> works, but on others the initial handshake just fails, thus no
>> SCTP connection whatsoever can be established.
>>
>> We observed that the SCTP INIT-ACK handshake reply from the IPVS
>> machine to the client had a correct IP checksum, but corrupt SCTP
>> checksum when forwarded, thus on the client-side the packet was
>> dropped and an intial handshake retriggered until all attempts
>> run into the void.
>
> 	Hm, may be packet is received with CHECKSUM_PARTIAL
> value? Is it a virtual NIC or a real NIC with the
> forwarding problem?

Thanks for your feedback!

The setup was about ...

  SCTP Client <--> IPVS Balancer <--> SCTP Server
  172.16.100.2    172.16.100.1(eth1)  192.168.100.11
                 192.168.100.1(eth2)

... where eth1 on IPVS uses the igb driver, which in fact seems to
support NETIF_F_SCTP_CSUM.

Interestingly, the path from the client to the server had no checksum
issues (no errors on the server in /proc/net/sctp/snmp), but on the
way back however from IPVS onwards to the client, the checksum is
wrong. With turned off SCTP checksum validation on the client side it
works obviously.

I think your hint might be correct to set

  skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;

since this is also done in ip_vs_proto_tcp.c after a full checksum
calculation. I will come back to your questions resp. with a version 2
of the patch a bit later after doing some experiments.

>> This patch fixes the problem by taking hardware offload features
>> of the NIC into account (which was just ignored here), similar as
>
> 	So, if NIC has no such support the bug remains?
> Why it works for some boxes? Where is the difference in
> the RX devices? GRO? skb->ip_summed?
>
>> done in the SCTP checksumming code itself. Also, while at it,
>> the checksum is in little-endian format (as fixed in commit 458f04c:
>> sctp: Clean up sctp checksumming code). Tested by myself.
>
> 	I don't feel such optimization can work in all cases.
> skb->dev is NULL in LOCAL_OUT hook (NAT via loopback).
> For dnat_handler skb->dev can be present but it is an old
> value. The new skb->dst value is prepared by ip_vs_nat_xmit
> but is still not set. For snat_handler the ip_vs_route_me_harder()
> can reroute, for example, when traffic from different VIPs
> use their own ISP link (another device).
>
> 	Even if we provide the new dst to IPVS nat handlers,
> later a netfilter rule can change the path and reroute the
> packet to different device. As result, I'm not sure
> CHECKSUM_PARTIAL is handled properly for SCTP in
> dev_hard_start_xmit and skb_checksum_help for the
> case where we are rerouted to device without hw csum
> support. skb_checksum_help supports only csum in 16 bits.
>
> 	Also, skb_transport_header is not updated yet,
> IPVS runs before such protocols, i.e. in LOCAL_IN, while
> ip_local_deliver_finish (where iphdr is skipped) is
> called after all handlers in this hook. It is not
> valid for FORWARD hook (for the snat_handler case).
> Still, the sctphoff value is present and can be used
> instead.
>
> 	May be you can instead test a change that adds a
> missing skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY in
> both handlers, including a change for the
> mentioned commit for endian format. May be crc32 should
> be changed from __be32 to __u32 and using the
> sctph->checksum = sctp_end_cksum(crc32) variant?
> I hope it will fix the wrong checksum in forwarding path
> if it is caused by the wrong ip_summed value.
>
>> Cc: Venkata Mohan Reddy <mohanreddykv@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>   net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>>   1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
>> index 746048b..dc41622 100644
>> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
>> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
>> @@ -61,14 +61,33 @@ sctp_conn_schedule(int af, struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_proto_data *pd,
>>   	return 1;
>>   }
>>
>> +static void sctp_nat_csum(struct sk_buff *skb, sctp_sctphdr_t *sctph,
>> +			  unsigned int sctphoff)
>> +{
>> +	struct sk_buff *iter;
>> +
>> +	/* Calculate the checksum */
>> +	if (!(skb->dev->features & NETIF_F_SCTP_CSUM)) {
>> +		__u32 crc32 = sctp_start_cksum((__u8 *)sctph,
>> +					       skb_headlen(skb) - sctphoff);
>> +		skb_walk_frags(skb, iter)
>> +			crc32 = sctp_update_cksum((u8 *) iter->data,
>> +						  skb_headlen(iter), crc32);
>> +		sctph->checksum = sctp_end_cksum(crc32);
>> +	} else {
>> +		/* no need to seed pseudo checksum for SCTP */
>> +		skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_PARTIAL;
>> +		skb->csum_start = (skb_transport_header(skb) - skb->head);
>> +		skb->csum_offset = offsetof(struct sctphdr, checksum);
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int
>>   sctp_snat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_protocol *pp,
>>   		  struct ip_vs_conn *cp, struct ip_vs_iphdr *iph)
>>   {
>>   	sctp_sctphdr_t *sctph;
>>   	unsigned int sctphoff = iph->len;
>> -	struct sk_buff *iter;
>> -	__be32 crc32;
>>
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6
>>   	if (cp->af = AF_INET6 && iph->fragoffs)
>> @@ -92,13 +111,7 @@ sctp_snat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_protocol *pp,
>>   	sctph = (void *) skb_network_header(skb) + sctphoff;
>>   	sctph->source = cp->vport;
>>
>> -	/* Calculate the checksum */
>> -	crc32 = sctp_start_cksum((u8 *) sctph, skb_headlen(skb) - sctphoff);
>> -	skb_walk_frags(skb, iter)
>> -		crc32 = sctp_update_cksum((u8 *) iter->data, skb_headlen(iter),
>> -				          crc32);
>> -	crc32 = sctp_end_cksum(crc32);
>> -	sctph->checksum = crc32;
>> +	sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
>>
>>   	return 1;
>>   }
>> @@ -109,8 +122,6 @@ sctp_dnat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_protocol *pp,
>>   {
>>   	sctp_sctphdr_t *sctph;
>>   	unsigned int sctphoff = iph->len;
>> -	struct sk_buff *iter;
>> -	__be32 crc32;
>>
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6
>>   	if (cp->af = AF_INET6 && iph->fragoffs)
>> @@ -134,13 +145,7 @@ sctp_dnat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_protocol *pp,
>>   	sctph = (void *) skb_network_header(skb) + sctphoff;
>>   	sctph->dest = cp->dport;
>>
>> -	/* Calculate the checksum */
>> -	crc32 = sctp_start_cksum((u8 *) sctph, skb_headlen(skb) - sctphoff);
>> -	skb_walk_frags(skb, iter)
>> -		crc32 = sctp_update_cksum((u8 *) iter->data, skb_headlen(iter),
>> -					  crc32);
>> -	crc32 = sctp_end_cksum(crc32);
>> -	sctph->checksum = crc32;
>> +	sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
>>
>>   	return 1;
>>   }
>> --
>> 1.7.11.7
>
> Regards
>
> --
> Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
To: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
Cc: horms@verge.net.au, mohanreddykv@gmail.com, pablo@netfilter.org,
	lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipvs: sctp: fix checksumming by adding hardware offload support
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 09:54:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5110C8BA.4080205@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1302042349350.1869@ja.ssi.bg>

On 02/05/2013 12:27 AM, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2013, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>
>> In our test lab, we have a simple SCTP client connecting to a SCTP
>> server via an IPVS load balancer. On some machines, load balancing
>> works, but on others the initial handshake just fails, thus no
>> SCTP connection whatsoever can be established.
>>
>> We observed that the SCTP INIT-ACK handshake reply from the IPVS
>> machine to the client had a correct IP checksum, but corrupt SCTP
>> checksum when forwarded, thus on the client-side the packet was
>> dropped and an intial handshake retriggered until all attempts
>> run into the void.
>
> 	Hm, may be packet is received with CHECKSUM_PARTIAL
> value? Is it a virtual NIC or a real NIC with the
> forwarding problem?

Thanks for your feedback!

The setup was about ...

  SCTP Client <--> IPVS Balancer <--> SCTP Server
  172.16.100.2    172.16.100.1(eth1)  192.168.100.11
                 192.168.100.1(eth2)

... where eth1 on IPVS uses the igb driver, which in fact seems to
support NETIF_F_SCTP_CSUM.

Interestingly, the path from the client to the server had no checksum
issues (no errors on the server in /proc/net/sctp/snmp), but on the
way back however from IPVS onwards to the client, the checksum is
wrong. With turned off SCTP checksum validation on the client side it
works obviously.

I think your hint might be correct to set

  skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;

since this is also done in ip_vs_proto_tcp.c after a full checksum
calculation. I will come back to your questions resp. with a version 2
of the patch a bit later after doing some experiments.

>> This patch fixes the problem by taking hardware offload features
>> of the NIC into account (which was just ignored here), similar as
>
> 	So, if NIC has no such support the bug remains?
> Why it works for some boxes? Where is the difference in
> the RX devices? GRO? skb->ip_summed?
>
>> done in the SCTP checksumming code itself. Also, while at it,
>> the checksum is in little-endian format (as fixed in commit 458f04c:
>> sctp: Clean up sctp checksumming code). Tested by myself.
>
> 	I don't feel such optimization can work in all cases.
> skb->dev is NULL in LOCAL_OUT hook (NAT via loopback).
> For dnat_handler skb->dev can be present but it is an old
> value. The new skb->dst value is prepared by ip_vs_nat_xmit
> but is still not set. For snat_handler the ip_vs_route_me_harder()
> can reroute, for example, when traffic from different VIPs
> use their own ISP link (another device).
>
> 	Even if we provide the new dst to IPVS nat handlers,
> later a netfilter rule can change the path and reroute the
> packet to different device. As result, I'm not sure
> CHECKSUM_PARTIAL is handled properly for SCTP in
> dev_hard_start_xmit and skb_checksum_help for the
> case where we are rerouted to device without hw csum
> support. skb_checksum_help supports only csum in 16 bits.
>
> 	Also, skb_transport_header is not updated yet,
> IPVS runs before such protocols, i.e. in LOCAL_IN, while
> ip_local_deliver_finish (where iphdr is skipped) is
> called after all handlers in this hook. It is not
> valid for FORWARD hook (for the snat_handler case).
> Still, the sctphoff value is present and can be used
> instead.
>
> 	May be you can instead test a change that adds a
> missing skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY in
> both handlers, including a change for the
> mentioned commit for endian format. May be crc32 should
> be changed from __be32 to __u32 and using the
> sctph->checksum = sctp_end_cksum(crc32) variant?
> I hope it will fix the wrong checksum in forwarding path
> if it is caused by the wrong ip_summed value.
>
>> Cc: Venkata Mohan Reddy <mohanreddykv@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>   net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>>   1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
>> index 746048b..dc41622 100644
>> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
>> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
>> @@ -61,14 +61,33 @@ sctp_conn_schedule(int af, struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_proto_data *pd,
>>   	return 1;
>>   }
>>
>> +static void sctp_nat_csum(struct sk_buff *skb, sctp_sctphdr_t *sctph,
>> +			  unsigned int sctphoff)
>> +{
>> +	struct sk_buff *iter;
>> +
>> +	/* Calculate the checksum */
>> +	if (!(skb->dev->features & NETIF_F_SCTP_CSUM)) {
>> +		__u32 crc32 = sctp_start_cksum((__u8 *)sctph,
>> +					       skb_headlen(skb) - sctphoff);
>> +		skb_walk_frags(skb, iter)
>> +			crc32 = sctp_update_cksum((u8 *) iter->data,
>> +						  skb_headlen(iter), crc32);
>> +		sctph->checksum = sctp_end_cksum(crc32);
>> +	} else {
>> +		/* no need to seed pseudo checksum for SCTP */
>> +		skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_PARTIAL;
>> +		skb->csum_start = (skb_transport_header(skb) - skb->head);
>> +		skb->csum_offset = offsetof(struct sctphdr, checksum);
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int
>>   sctp_snat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_protocol *pp,
>>   		  struct ip_vs_conn *cp, struct ip_vs_iphdr *iph)
>>   {
>>   	sctp_sctphdr_t *sctph;
>>   	unsigned int sctphoff = iph->len;
>> -	struct sk_buff *iter;
>> -	__be32 crc32;
>>
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6
>>   	if (cp->af == AF_INET6 && iph->fragoffs)
>> @@ -92,13 +111,7 @@ sctp_snat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_protocol *pp,
>>   	sctph = (void *) skb_network_header(skb) + sctphoff;
>>   	sctph->source = cp->vport;
>>
>> -	/* Calculate the checksum */
>> -	crc32 = sctp_start_cksum((u8 *) sctph, skb_headlen(skb) - sctphoff);
>> -	skb_walk_frags(skb, iter)
>> -		crc32 = sctp_update_cksum((u8 *) iter->data, skb_headlen(iter),
>> -				          crc32);
>> -	crc32 = sctp_end_cksum(crc32);
>> -	sctph->checksum = crc32;
>> +	sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
>>
>>   	return 1;
>>   }
>> @@ -109,8 +122,6 @@ sctp_dnat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_protocol *pp,
>>   {
>>   	sctp_sctphdr_t *sctph;
>>   	unsigned int sctphoff = iph->len;
>> -	struct sk_buff *iter;
>> -	__be32 crc32;
>>
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6
>>   	if (cp->af == AF_INET6 && iph->fragoffs)
>> @@ -134,13 +145,7 @@ sctp_dnat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_protocol *pp,
>>   	sctph = (void *) skb_network_header(skb) + sctphoff;
>>   	sctph->dest = cp->dport;
>>
>> -	/* Calculate the checksum */
>> -	crc32 = sctp_start_cksum((u8 *) sctph, skb_headlen(skb) - sctphoff);
>> -	skb_walk_frags(skb, iter)
>> -		crc32 = sctp_update_cksum((u8 *) iter->data, skb_headlen(iter),
>> -					  crc32);
>> -	crc32 = sctp_end_cksum(crc32);
>> -	sctph->checksum = crc32;
>> +	sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
>>
>>   	return 1;
>>   }
>> --
>> 1.7.11.7
>
> Regards
>
> --
> Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-05  8:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <cover.1359997089.git.dborkman@redhat.com>
2013-02-04 17:27 ` [PATCH net] ipvs: sctp: fix checksumming by adding hardware offload support Daniel Borkmann
2013-02-04 17:27   ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-02-04 23:27   ` Julian Anastasov
2013-02-04 23:27     ` Julian Anastasov
2013-02-05  8:54     ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2013-02-05  8:54       ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-02-05 16:21   ` [PATCH net] ipvs: sctp: fix checksumming on snat and dnat handlers Daniel Borkmann
2013-02-05 16:21     ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-02-05 21:41     ` Julian Anastasov
2013-02-05 21:41       ` Julian Anastasov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5110C8BA.4080205@redhat.com \
    --to=dborkman@redhat.com \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=ja@ssi.bg \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mohanreddykv@gmail.com \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.