All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/5] KVM: MMU: unify the code of walking pte list
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:54:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5110C8C6.6020004@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5110C853.4080705@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Current code has two ways to walk pte_list, the one is pte_list_walk and
the another way is rmap_get_first and rmap_get_next, they have the same logic.

This patch introduces for_each_spte_in_pte_list to integrate their code

[ Impact: no logic changed, most of the change is function/struct rename ]

Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c       |  178 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu_audit.c |    5 +-
 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index a0dc0d7..2291ea3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -945,26 +945,75 @@ static void pte_list_remove(u64 *spte, unsigned long *pte_list)
 	}
 }

-typedef void (*pte_list_walk_fn) (u64 *spte);
-static void pte_list_walk(unsigned long *pte_list, pte_list_walk_fn fn)
+/*
+ * Used by the following functions to iterate through the sptes linked by a
+ * pte_list.  All fields are private and not assumed to be used outside.
+ */
+struct pte_list_iterator {
+	/* private fields */
+	struct pte_list_desc *desc;	/* holds the sptep if not NULL */
+	int pos;			/* index of the sptep */
+};
+
+/*
+ * Iteration must be started by this function.  This should also be used after
+ * removing/dropping sptes from the pte_list link because in such cases the
+ * information in the itererator may not be valid.
+ *
+ * Returns sptep if found, NULL otherwise.
+ */
+static u64 *pte_list_get_first(unsigned long pte_list,
+			       struct pte_list_iterator *iter)
 {
-	struct pte_list_desc *desc;
-	int i;
+	if (!pte_list)
+		return NULL;

-	if (!*pte_list)
-		return;
+	if (!(pte_list & 1)) {
+		iter->desc = NULL;
+		return (u64 *)pte_list;
+	}
+
+	iter->desc = (struct pte_list_desc *)(pte_list & ~1ul);
+	iter->pos = 0;
+	return iter->desc->sptes[iter->pos];
+}
+
+/*
+ * Must be used with a valid iterator: e.g. after pte_list_get_next().
+ *
+ * Returns sptep if found, NULL otherwise.
+ */
+static u64 *pte_list_get_next(struct pte_list_iterator *iter)
+{
+	if (iter->desc) {
+		if (iter->pos < PTE_LIST_EXT - 1) {
+			u64 *sptep;
+
+			++iter->pos;
+			sptep = iter->desc->sptes[iter->pos];
+			if (sptep)
+				return sptep;
+		}

-	if (!(*pte_list & 1))
-		return fn((u64 *)*pte_list);
+		iter->desc = iter->desc->more;

-	desc = (struct pte_list_desc *)(*pte_list & ~1ul);
-	while (desc) {
-		for (i = 0; i < PTE_LIST_EXT && desc->sptes[i]; ++i)
-			fn(desc->sptes[i]);
-		desc = desc->more;
+		if (iter->desc) {
+			iter->pos = 0;
+			/* desc->sptes[0] cannot be NULL */
+			return iter->desc->sptes[iter->pos];
+		}
 	}
+
+	return NULL;
 }

+#define for_each_spte_in_pte_list(pte_list, iter, spte)		\
+	   for (spte = pte_list_get_first(pte_list, &(iter));	\
+	      spte != NULL; spte = pte_list_get_next(&(iter)))
+
+#define for_each_spte_in_rmap(rmap, iter, spte)			\
+	   for_each_spte_in_pte_list(rmap, iter, spte)
+
 static unsigned long *__gfn_to_rmap(gfn_t gfn, int level,
 				    struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
 {
@@ -1016,67 +1065,6 @@ static void rmap_remove(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *spte)
 	pte_list_remove(spte, rmapp);
 }

-/*
- * Used by the following functions to iterate through the sptes linked by a
- * rmap.  All fields are private and not assumed to be used outside.
- */
-struct rmap_iterator {
-	/* private fields */
-	struct pte_list_desc *desc;	/* holds the sptep if not NULL */
-	int pos;			/* index of the sptep */
-};
-
-/*
- * Iteration must be started by this function.  This should also be used after
- * removing/dropping sptes from the rmap link because in such cases the
- * information in the itererator may not be valid.
- *
- * Returns sptep if found, NULL otherwise.
- */
-static u64 *rmap_get_first(unsigned long rmap, struct rmap_iterator *iter)
-{
-	if (!rmap)
-		return NULL;
-
-	if (!(rmap & 1)) {
-		iter->desc = NULL;
-		return (u64 *)rmap;
-	}
-
-	iter->desc = (struct pte_list_desc *)(rmap & ~1ul);
-	iter->pos = 0;
-	return iter->desc->sptes[iter->pos];
-}
-
-/*
- * Must be used with a valid iterator: e.g. after rmap_get_first().
- *
- * Returns sptep if found, NULL otherwise.
- */
-static u64 *rmap_get_next(struct rmap_iterator *iter)
-{
-	if (iter->desc) {
-		if (iter->pos < PTE_LIST_EXT - 1) {
-			u64 *sptep;
-
-			++iter->pos;
-			sptep = iter->desc->sptes[iter->pos];
-			if (sptep)
-				return sptep;
-		}
-
-		iter->desc = iter->desc->more;
-
-		if (iter->desc) {
-			iter->pos = 0;
-			/* desc->sptes[0] cannot be NULL */
-			return iter->desc->sptes[iter->pos];
-		}
-	}
-
-	return NULL;
-}
-
 static void drop_spte(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep)
 {
 	if (mmu_spte_clear_track_bits(sptep))
@@ -1137,14 +1125,13 @@ static bool __rmap_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp,
 				 bool pt_protect)
 {
 	u64 *sptep;
-	struct rmap_iterator iter;
+	struct pte_list_iterator iter;
 	bool flush = false;

-	for (sptep = rmap_get_first(*rmapp, &iter); sptep;) {
+	for_each_spte_in_rmap(*rmapp, iter, sptep) {
 		BUG_ON(!(*sptep & PT_PRESENT_MASK));

 		flush |= spte_write_protect(kvm, sptep, pt_protect);
-		sptep = rmap_get_next(&iter);
 	}

 	return flush;
@@ -1198,15 +1185,14 @@ static int kvm_unmap_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp,
 			   struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, unsigned long data)
 {
 	u64 *sptep;
-	struct rmap_iterator iter;
+	struct pte_list_iterator iter;
 	int need_tlb_flush = 0;

-	while ((sptep = rmap_get_first(*rmapp, &iter))) {
-		BUG_ON(!(*sptep & PT_PRESENT_MASK));
-		rmap_printk("kvm_rmap_unmap_hva: spte %p %llx\n", sptep, *sptep);
-
+restart:
+	for_each_spte_in_rmap(*rmapp, iter, sptep) {
 		drop_spte(kvm, sptep);
 		need_tlb_flush = 1;
+		goto restart;
 	}

 	return need_tlb_flush;
@@ -1216,7 +1202,7 @@ static int kvm_set_pte_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp,
 			     struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, unsigned long data)
 {
 	u64 *sptep;
-	struct rmap_iterator iter;
+	struct pte_list_iterator iter;
 	int need_flush = 0;
 	u64 new_spte;
 	pte_t *ptep = (pte_t *)data;
@@ -1228,7 +1214,7 @@ static int kvm_set_pte_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp,
 	if (pte_write(*ptep))
 		need_flush = kvm_unmap_rmapp(kvm, rmapp, slot, data);
 	else
-		for (sptep = rmap_get_first(*rmapp, &iter); sptep;) {
+		for_each_spte_in_rmap(*rmapp, iter, sptep) {
 			BUG_ON(!is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep));
 			rmap_printk("kvm_set_pte_rmapp: spte %p %llx\n",
 				    sptep, *sptep);
@@ -1244,7 +1230,6 @@ static int kvm_set_pte_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp,

 			mmu_spte_clear_track_bits(sptep);
 			mmu_spte_set(sptep, new_spte);
-			sptep = rmap_get_next(&iter);
 		}

 	if (need_flush)
@@ -1335,7 +1320,7 @@ static int kvm_age_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp,
 			 struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, unsigned long data)
 {
 	u64 *sptep;
-	struct rmap_iterator uninitialized_var(iter);
+	struct pte_list_iterator uninitialized_var(iter);
 	int young = 0;

 	/*
@@ -1351,8 +1336,7 @@ static int kvm_age_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp,
 		goto out;
 	}

-	for (sptep = rmap_get_first(*rmapp, &iter); sptep;
-	     sptep = rmap_get_next(&iter)) {
+	for_each_spte_in_rmap(*rmapp, iter, sptep) {
 		BUG_ON(!is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep));

 		if (*sptep & shadow_accessed_mask) {
@@ -1371,7 +1355,7 @@ static int kvm_test_age_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp,
 			      struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, unsigned long data)
 {
 	u64 *sptep;
-	struct rmap_iterator iter;
+	struct pte_list_iterator iter;
 	int young = 0;

 	/*
@@ -1382,8 +1366,7 @@ static int kvm_test_age_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp,
 	if (!shadow_accessed_mask)
 		goto out;

-	for (sptep = rmap_get_first(*rmapp, &iter); sptep;
-	     sptep = rmap_get_next(&iter)) {
+	for_each_spte_in_rmap(*rmapp, iter, sptep) {
 		BUG_ON(!is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep));

 		if (*sptep & shadow_accessed_mask) {
@@ -1515,7 +1498,11 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_alloc_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 static void mark_unsync(u64 *spte);
 static void kvm_mmu_mark_parents_unsync(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
 {
-	pte_list_walk(&sp->parent_ptes, mark_unsync);
+	struct pte_list_iterator iter;
+	u64 *spte;
+
+	for_each_spte_in_pte_list(sp->parent_ptes, iter, spte)
+		mark_unsync(spte);
 }

 static void mark_unsync(u64 *spte)
@@ -2035,10 +2022,13 @@ static void kvm_mmu_page_unlink_children(struct kvm *kvm,
 static void kvm_mmu_unlink_parents(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
 {
 	u64 *sptep;
-	struct rmap_iterator iter;
+	struct pte_list_iterator iter;

-	while ((sptep = rmap_get_first(sp->parent_ptes, &iter)))
+restart:
+	for_each_spte_in_pte_list(sp->parent_ptes, iter, sptep) {
 		drop_parent_pte(sp, sptep);
+		goto restart;
+	}
 }

 static int mmu_zap_unsync_children(struct kvm *kvm,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu_audit.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu_audit.c
index daff69e..a08d384 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu_audit.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu_audit.c
@@ -190,15 +190,14 @@ static void audit_write_protection(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
 {
 	unsigned long *rmapp;
 	u64 *sptep;
-	struct rmap_iterator iter;
+	struct pte_list_iterator iter;

 	if (sp->role.direct || sp->unsync || sp->role.invalid)
 		return;

 	rmapp = gfn_to_rmap(kvm, sp->gfn, PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL);

-	for (sptep = rmap_get_first(*rmapp, &iter); sptep;
-	     sptep = rmap_get_next(&iter)) {
+	for_each_spte_in_rmap(*rmapp, iter, sptep) {
 		if (is_writable_pte(*sptep))
 			audit_printk(kvm, "shadow page has writable "
 				     "mappings: gfn %llx role %x\n",
-- 
1.7.7.6


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-02-05  8:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-05  8:52 [PATCH v3 0/5] KVM: MMU: unify and cleanup the code of walking pte list Xiao Guangrong
2013-02-05  8:53 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] KVM: MMU: introduce mmu_spte_establish Xiao Guangrong
2013-02-08 21:35   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-02-05  8:53 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] KVM: MMU: clarify the logic in kvm_set_pte_rmapp Xiao Guangrong
2013-02-05  8:54 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2013-02-05  8:54 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] KVM: MMU: fix spte assertion Xiao Guangrong
2013-02-05  8:55 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] KVM: MMU: fast drop all spte on the pte_list Xiao Guangrong
2013-02-08 21:48   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-02-05 13:04 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] KVM: MMU: unify and cleanup the code of walking pte list Gleb Natapov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5110C8C6.6020004@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.