From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/5] KVM: MMU: fix spte assertion
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:54:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5110C8E3.1080009@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5110C853.4080705@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
PT_PRESENT_MASK bit is not enough to see the spte has already been mapped
into pte-list for mmio spte also set this bit. Use is_shadow_present_pte
instead to fix it
Also, this patch move many assertions to the common place to clean up the
code
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 20 ++++++--------------
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index 2291ea3..58f813a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -1009,7 +1009,9 @@ static u64 *pte_list_get_next(struct pte_list_iterator *iter)
#define for_each_spte_in_pte_list(pte_list, iter, spte) \
for (spte = pte_list_get_first(pte_list, &(iter)); \
- spte != NULL; spte = pte_list_get_next(&(iter)))
+ spte != NULL && \
+ ({WARN_ON(!is_shadow_present_pte(*(spte))); 1; });\
+ spte = pte_list_get_next(&iter))
#define for_each_spte_in_rmap(rmap, iter, spte) \
for_each_spte_in_pte_list(rmap, iter, spte)
@@ -1128,11 +1130,8 @@ static bool __rmap_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp,
struct pte_list_iterator iter;
bool flush = false;
- for_each_spte_in_rmap(*rmapp, iter, sptep) {
- BUG_ON(!(*sptep & PT_PRESENT_MASK));
-
+ for_each_spte_in_rmap(*rmapp, iter, sptep)
flush |= spte_write_protect(kvm, sptep, pt_protect);
- }
return flush;
}
@@ -1215,7 +1214,6 @@ static int kvm_set_pte_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp,
need_flush = kvm_unmap_rmapp(kvm, rmapp, slot, data);
else
for_each_spte_in_rmap(*rmapp, iter, sptep) {
- BUG_ON(!is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep));
rmap_printk("kvm_set_pte_rmapp: spte %p %llx\n",
sptep, *sptep);
@@ -1336,15 +1334,12 @@ static int kvm_age_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp,
goto out;
}
- for_each_spte_in_rmap(*rmapp, iter, sptep) {
- BUG_ON(!is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep));
-
+ for_each_spte_in_rmap(*rmapp, iter, sptep)
if (*sptep & shadow_accessed_mask) {
young = 1;
clear_bit((ffs(shadow_accessed_mask) - 1),
(unsigned long *)sptep);
}
- }
out:
/* @data has hva passed to kvm_age_hva(). */
trace_kvm_age_page(data, slot, young);
@@ -1366,14 +1361,11 @@ static int kvm_test_age_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp,
if (!shadow_accessed_mask)
goto out;
- for_each_spte_in_rmap(*rmapp, iter, sptep) {
- BUG_ON(!is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep));
-
+ for_each_spte_in_rmap(*rmapp, iter, sptep)
if (*sptep & shadow_accessed_mask) {
young = 1;
break;
}
- }
out:
return young;
}
--
1.7.7.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-05 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-05 8:52 [PATCH v3 0/5] KVM: MMU: unify and cleanup the code of walking pte list Xiao Guangrong
2013-02-05 8:53 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] KVM: MMU: introduce mmu_spte_establish Xiao Guangrong
2013-02-08 21:35 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-02-05 8:53 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] KVM: MMU: clarify the logic in kvm_set_pte_rmapp Xiao Guangrong
2013-02-05 8:54 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] KVM: MMU: unify the code of walking pte list Xiao Guangrong
2013-02-05 8:54 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2013-02-05 8:55 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] KVM: MMU: fast drop all spte on the pte_list Xiao Guangrong
2013-02-08 21:48 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-02-05 13:04 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] KVM: MMU: unify and cleanup the code of walking pte list Gleb Natapov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5110C8E3.1080009@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.