From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Joe Lawrence <Joe.Lawrence@stratus.com>
Cc: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Chanho Min <chanho.min@lge.com>,
David Milburn <dmilburn@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/10] More device removal fixes
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 11:40:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5113849D.9060209@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1302061727030.11804@jlaw-desktop.mno.stratus.com>
On 02/06/13 23:31, Joe Lawrence wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> Fix a few race conditions that can be triggered by removing a device:
>> - Fix a race between starved list processing and device removal.
>> - Avoid that a SCSI LLD callback can get invoked after
>> scsi_remove_host() finished.
>> - Speed up device removal by stopping error handling as soon as
>> the SHOST_DEL or SHOST_DEL_RECOVERY state has been reached.
>> - Save and restore the host_scribble field during error handling
>>
>> These patches have been tested on top of kernel v3.8-rc6 and are also
>> available here: http://github.com/bvanassche/linux/tree/device-removal-fixes.
>
> Hi Bart,
>
> I gave your patchset a spin on our ftServer, which supports hotplug of PCI
> devices. Before attempting a surprise HW removal of an LSI Fusion SAS-2
> SCSI controller, I issued an orderly removal through our hotplug driver.
> The device removal appeared to hang (this does not occur with vanilla
> 3.8.0-rc6).
Hello Joe,
Thanks for running this test. I have had a quick look at the mpt2sas
_scsih_remove() implementation but I have not yet had the time to
analyze that function entirely. My proposal is to defer further analysis
of the interaction between the two patches that make scsi_remove_host()
wait and the mpt2sas driver until a later time. It would be appreciated
if you could run the following test:
* Revert the two patches that make scsi_remove_host() wait (these
two patches should revert cleanly).
* Repeat your device removal test.
If that test runs fine, I will retest and repost this patch series
without the two patches that make scsi_remove_host() wait.
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-07 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-05 12:44 [PATCH v8 0/10] More device removal fixes Bart Van Assche
2013-02-05 12:45 ` [PATCH v8 01/10] Fix race between starved list processing and device removal Bart Van Assche
2013-02-05 12:46 ` [PATCH v8 02/10] Remove get_device() / put_device() pair from scsi_request_fn() Bart Van Assche
2013-02-05 12:47 ` [PATCH v8 03/10] Introduce scsi_device_being_removed() Bart Van Assche
2013-02-05 12:47 ` [PATCH v8 04/10] Remove offline devices when removing a host Bart Van Assche
2013-02-05 12:48 ` [PATCH v8 05/10] Disallow changing the device state via sysfs into "deleted" Bart Van Assche
2013-02-05 12:49 ` [PATCH v8 06/10] Avoid saving/restoring interrupt state inside scsi_remove_host() Bart Van Assche
2013-02-05 12:49 ` [PATCH v8 07/10] Make scsi_remove_host() wait for device removal Bart Van Assche
2013-02-05 12:50 ` [PATCH v8 08/10] Make scsi_remove_host() wait until error handling finished Bart Van Assche
2013-02-05 12:51 ` [PATCH v8 09/10] Avoid that scsi_device_set_state() triggers a race Bart Van Assche
2013-02-05 12:51 ` [PATCH v8 10/10] Save and restore host_scribble during error handling Bart Van Assche
2013-02-06 22:31 ` [PATCH v8 0/10] More device removal fixes Joe Lawrence
2013-02-07 10:40 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2013-02-07 11:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2013-02-08 23:29 ` Joe Lawrence
2013-02-09 9:28 ` Bart Van Assche
2013-02-11 20:36 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5113849D.9060209@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=Joe.Lawrence@stratus.com \
--cc=chanho.min@lge.com \
--cc=dmilburn@redhat.com \
--cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.