From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: Fix the dt return condition in pm_late_init()
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 21:06:11 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51151B6B.9000505@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1302081533270.28008@utopia.booyaka.com>
On Friday 08 February 2013 09:04 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2013, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>
>> Commit 1416408d {ARM: OMAP2+: PM: share some suspend-related functions
>> across OMAP2, 3, 4} moved suspend code to common place but now with
>> that change, for DT build on OMAP4, suspend hooks are not getting
>> registered which results in no suspend support.
>>
>> The DT return condition is limited to PMIC and smartreflex
>> initialization and hence restrict it so that suspend ops gets
>> registered.
>>
>> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
>> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
>
> Thanks, queued here with Felipe's Reviewed-by: along with the other OMAP4
> PM fixes.
>
Thanks Paul !!
Regards,
Santosh
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: Fix the dt return condition in pm_late_init()
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 21:06:11 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51151B6B.9000505@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1302081533270.28008@utopia.booyaka.com>
On Friday 08 February 2013 09:04 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2013, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>
>> Commit 1416408d {ARM: OMAP2+: PM: share some suspend-related functions
>> across OMAP2, 3, 4} moved suspend code to common place but now with
>> that change, for DT build on OMAP4, suspend hooks are not getting
>> registered which results in no suspend support.
>>
>> The DT return condition is limited to PMIC and smartreflex
>> initialization and hence restrict it so that suspend ops gets
>> registered.
>>
>> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
>> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
>
> Thanks, queued here with Felipe's Reviewed-by: along with the other OMAP4
> PM fixes.
>
Thanks Paul !!
Regards,
Santosh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-08 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-08 15:11 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: Fix the dt return condition in pm_late_init() Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-08 15:11 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-08 15:11 ` [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Remove duplicate omap4430_init_late() declaration Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-08 15:11 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-08 15:21 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-08 15:21 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-15 9:35 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-15 9:35 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-04 18:19 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-03-04 18:19 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-08 15:11 ` [PATCH] ARM: OMAP4: PM: Avoid expensive cpu_suspend() path for all CPU power states except off Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-08 15:11 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-08 15:26 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-08 15:26 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-08 15:34 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-08 15:34 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-08 21:19 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-02-08 21:19 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-02-12 4:55 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-12 4:55 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-12 15:18 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-02-12 15:18 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-02-13 5:05 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-13 5:05 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-08 15:20 ` [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: Fix the dt return condition in pm_late_init() Felipe Balbi
2013-02-08 15:20 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-08 15:34 ` Paul Walmsley
2013-02-08 15:34 ` Paul Walmsley
2013-02-08 15:36 ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2013-02-08 15:36 ` Santosh Shilimkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51151B6B.9000505@ti.com \
--to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.