All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] serial/arc-uart: switch to devicetree based probing
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 12:15:10 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5115F076.5000909@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130208230127.5F3063E2C27@localhost>

On Saturday 09 February 2013 04:31 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:50:23 +0530, Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> wrote:
>> +- clock-frequency	: the input clock frequency for the UART
>> +- baud			: baud rate for UART
> change 'baud' to 'current-speed'. There is already precedence for this
> with other serial devices.

While I'm OK with this - I can only see of_serial.c following the rule :-)
More importantly I'm not clear about the logistics of this fix. Obviously this has
a bearing on DT files in arch/arc/boot/*. So are such changes (platform + driver)
routed thru the subsystem tree or the arch tree or bits from both with
bisectability not considered - which feels wrong. We have to also consider the
fact that Greg has closed the tty/serial for 3.9. So while I have no objection to
your comment, it seems that the it needs to wait till 3.9-rc1 - or is there an
alternate way.

>
>> @@ -673,8 +693,18 @@ static int __init arc_serial_probe_earlyprintk(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  static int arc_serial_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  {
>>  	int rc, dev_id;
>> +	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>> +
>> +	/* no device tree device */
>> +	if (!np)
>> +		return -ENODEV;
> This breaks non-DT users. Is this what you intend? It creates a flag day
> where users have to switch from non-DT to DT cold-turkey.

Not supporting non-DT user was not the idea - it just simplifies the code a bit
given that it would only even be runtime used in a ARC Linux port based platform -
which unconditionally enables OF.  Further - the ARC port itself is not yet
upstream so there are no "official" user of this in tree driver.
FWIW, ARC Linux port was recently reviewed on lkml/arch mailing lists and is now
in linux-next for a possible 3.9 merge.

>> +	dev_id = of_alias_get_id(np, "serial");
>> +	if (dev_id < 0) {
>> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get alias id: %d\n", dev_id);
>> +		return dev_id;
>> +	}
> Don't fail on this. If you can't get an id then choose one dynamically.

You mean just assume 0.

Thanks for reviewing.
-Vineet

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: <linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] serial/arc-uart: switch to devicetree based probing
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 12:15:10 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5115F076.5000909@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130208230127.5F3063E2C27@localhost>

On Saturday 09 February 2013 04:31 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:50:23 +0530, Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> wrote:
>> +- clock-frequency	: the input clock frequency for the UART
>> +- baud			: baud rate for UART
> change 'baud' to 'current-speed'. There is already precedence for this
> with other serial devices.

While I'm OK with this - I can only see of_serial.c following the rule :-)
More importantly I'm not clear about the logistics of this fix. Obviously this has
a bearing on DT files in arch/arc/boot/*. So are such changes (platform + driver)
routed thru the subsystem tree or the arch tree or bits from both with
bisectability not considered - which feels wrong. We have to also consider the
fact that Greg has closed the tty/serial for 3.9. So while I have no objection to
your comment, it seems that the it needs to wait till 3.9-rc1 - or is there an
alternate way.

>
>> @@ -673,8 +693,18 @@ static int __init arc_serial_probe_earlyprintk(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  static int arc_serial_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  {
>>  	int rc, dev_id;
>> +	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>> +
>> +	/* no device tree device */
>> +	if (!np)
>> +		return -ENODEV;
> This breaks non-DT users. Is this what you intend? It creates a flag day
> where users have to switch from non-DT to DT cold-turkey.

Not supporting non-DT user was not the idea - it just simplifies the code a bit
given that it would only even be runtime used in a ARC Linux port based platform -
which unconditionally enables OF.  Further - the ARC port itself is not yet
upstream so there are no "official" user of this in tree driver.
FWIW, ARC Linux port was recently reviewed on lkml/arch mailing lists and is now
in linux-next for a possible 3.9 merge.

>> +	dev_id = of_alias_get_id(np, "serial");
>> +	if (dev_id < 0) {
>> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get alias id: %d\n", dev_id);
>> +		return dev_id;
>> +	}
> Don't fail on this. If you can't get an id then choose one dynamically.

You mean just assume 0.

Thanks for reviewing.
-Vineet

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-09  6:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-11  6:20 [PATCH 0/4] switch arc-uart to devicetree based probing Vineet Gupta
2013-01-11  6:20 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-01-11  6:20 ` [PATCH 1/4] serial/arc-uart: Don't index with -ve platform_device->id Vineet Gupta
2013-01-11  6:20   ` Vineet Gupta
2013-01-11  6:20 ` [PATCH 2/4] serial/arc-uart: split probe from probe_earlyprintk Vineet Gupta
2013-01-11  6:20   ` Vineet Gupta
2013-01-11  6:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] serial/arc-uart: platform_data order changed Vineet Gupta
2013-01-11  6:20   ` Vineet Gupta
2013-01-11  6:20 ` [PATCH 4/4] serial/arc-uart: switch to devicetree based probing Vineet Gupta
2013-01-11  6:20   ` Vineet Gupta
2013-01-11 11:33   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-11 11:55     ` Vineet Gupta
2013-01-11 11:55       ` Vineet Gupta
2013-01-11 20:17       ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-08 23:01   ` Grant Likely
2013-02-08 23:01     ` Grant Likely
2013-02-09  6:45     ` Vineet Gupta [this message]
2013-02-09  6:45       ` Vineet Gupta
2013-02-09  9:28       ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-11  8:41         ` [PATCH] serial/arc-uart: Urgent DT related update Vineet Gupta
2013-02-11  8:41           ` [PATCH] serial/arc-uart: Miscll DT related updates (Grant's review comments) Vineet Gupta
2013-02-11  8:41             ` Vineet Gupta
2013-02-13 12:37           ` [PATCH] serial/arc-uart: Urgent DT related update Vineet Gupta
2013-02-13 16:38             ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-02-14  5:55               ` Vineet Gupta
2013-02-14 17:23                 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-02-13 20:47       ` [PATCH 4/4] serial/arc-uart: switch to devicetree based probing Grant Likely
2013-01-16  6:16 ` [PATCH 0/4] switch arc-uart " Greg KH
2013-01-16  6:16   ` Vineet Gupta
2013-01-16  6:16     ` Vineet Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5115F076.5000909@synopsys.com \
    --to=vineet.gupta1@synopsys.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=rob@landley.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.