[PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail Machine

[PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail Machine

[kishore.k.bodke]

From: Kishore Bodke <kishore.k.bodke@intel.com>


Hi,

This patch set is to remove the Cedartail Machine from 
Linux-yocto-3.4 Kernel.
Cedartrail BSP will not be supported for Yocto 1.4 Release.

Also Please remove the standard/cedartrail branch.

Please pull into linux-yocto-3.4/meta branch.

Thanks
Kishore.

The following changes since commit f697e099bc76d5df3a307a5bc0cc25021dd6dfe0:

  meta: bump to v3.4.28, rt-40 (2013-02-04 00:14:21 -0500)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.pokylinux.org/linux-yocto-contrib kishore/cedartrail_remove
  http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/linux-yocto-contrib/log/?h=kishore/cedartrail_remove

Kishore Bodke (1):
  meta: Remove Cedartrail Machine

 .../bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-preempt-rt.scc       |   13 ------
 .../bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-standard.scc         |    8 ----
 .../cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.cfg |   46 --------------------
 .../cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.scc |   15 -------
 4 files changed, 82 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100755 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-preempt-rt.scc
 delete mode 100755 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-standard.scc
 delete mode 100755 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.cfg
 delete mode 100644 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.scc

-- 
1.7.9.5

[PATCH 1/1][linux-yocto] meta: Remove Cedartrail Machine

[kishore.k.bodke]

From: Kishore Bodke <kishore.k.bodke@intel.com>

Remove Cedartrail Machine from 3.4 Kernel.
Cedartrail BSP is not available.

Signed-off-by: Kishore Bodke <kishore.k.bodke@intel.com>
---
 .../bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-preempt-rt.scc       |   13 ------
 .../bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-standard.scc         |    8 ----
 .../cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.cfg |   46 --------------------
 .../cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.scc |   15 -------
 4 files changed, 82 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100755 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-preempt-rt.scc
 delete mode 100755 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-standard.scc
 delete mode 100755 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.cfg
 delete mode 100644 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.scc

diff --git a/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-preempt-rt.scc b/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-preempt-rt.scc
deleted file mode 100755
index d0f4871..0000000
--- a/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-preempt-rt.scc
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,13 +0,0 @@
-define KMACHINE cedartrail
-define KTYPE preempt-rt
-define KARCH i386
-
-# no new branch required, re-use the ktypes/preempt-rt/preempt-rt.scc branch
-include ktypes/preempt-rt/preempt-rt.scc
-include cedartrail.scc
-
-# default policy for preempt-rt kernels
-include cfg/usb-mass-storage.scc
-include cfg/boot-live.scc
-include features/latencytop/latencytop.scc
-include features/profiling/profiling.scc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-standard.scc b/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-standard.scc
deleted file mode 100755
index f9e4ab1..0000000
--- a/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-standard.scc
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,8 +0,0 @@
-define KMACHINE cedartrail
-define KTYPE standard
-define KARCH i386
-
-include ktypes/standard/standard.scc
-branch cedartrail
-
-include cedartrail.scc
diff --git a/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.cfg b/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.cfg
deleted file mode 100755
index c7f9355..0000000
--- a/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.cfg
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,46 +0,0 @@
-CONFIG_X86_32=y
-CONFIG_MATOM=y
-CONFIG_PRINTK=y
-
-# RTC 
-CONFIG_RTC_CLASS=y
-CONFIG_RTC_DRV_CMOS=y
-
-# Basic hardware support for the box - network, USB, PCI, sound
-CONFIG_NETDEVICES=y
-CONFIG_ATA=y
-CONFIG_ATA_GENERIC=y
-CONFIG_ATA_SFF=y
-CONFIG_PCI=y
-CONFIG_MMC=y
-CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI=y
-CONFIG_USB_SUPPORT=y
-CONFIG_USB=y
-CONFIG_USB_ARCH_HAS_EHCI=y
-CONFIG_R8169=y
-CONFIG_PATA_SCH=y
-CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_PCI=y
-CONFIG_USB_EHCI_HCD=y
-CONFIG_PCIEPORTBUS=y
-CONFIG_NET=y
-CONFIG_USB_UHCI_HCD=y
-CONFIG_USB_OHCI_HCD=y
-CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SD=y
-CONFIG_CHR_DEV_SG=y
-CONFIG_SOUND=y
-CONFIG_SND=y
-CONFIG_SND_HDA_INTEL=y
-CONFIG_SATA_AHCI=y
-CONFIG_AGP=y
-CONFIG_PM=y
-CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_LCD_SUPPORT=y
-CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE=y
-CONFIG_INPUT=y
-
-# Make sure these are on, otherwise the bootup won't be fun
-CONFIG_UNIX=y
-CONFIG_INET=y
-CONFIG_MODULES=y
-CONFIG_SHMEM=y
-CONFIG_TMPFS=y
-CONFIG_PACKET=y
diff --git a/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.scc b/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.scc
deleted file mode 100644
index 9c013b6..0000000
--- a/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.scc
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
-kconf hardware cedartrail.cfg
-
-include cfg/x86.scc
-include features/intel-e1xxxx/intel-e100.scc
-include features/intel-e1xxxx/intel-e1xxxx.scc
-include cfg/dmaengine.scc
-include cfg/8250.scc
-include cfg/vesafb.scc
-include cfg/usb-mass-storage.scc
-include cfg/boot-live.scc
-
-
-include features/latencytop/latencytop.scc
-include features/profiling/profiling.scc
-
-- 
1.7.9.5

Re: [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail Machine

[Chris Tapp]

On 8 Feb 2013, at 23:18, kishore.k.bodke@intel.com wrote:

> From: Kishore Bodke <kishore.k.bodke@intel.com>
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This patch set is to remove the Cedartail Machine from 
> Linux-yocto-3.4 Kernel.
> Cedartrail BSP will not be supported for Yocto 1.4 Release.

Hi Kishore,

Are there any plans to bring support back in? We recently committed a project to using this BSP for the Intel DN2800MT...

> Also Please remove the standard/cedartrail branch.
> 
> Please pull into linux-yocto-3.4/meta branch.
> 
> Thanks
> Kishore.
> 
> The following changes since commit f697e099bc76d5df3a307a5bc0cc25021dd6dfe0:
> 
>  meta: bump to v3.4.28, rt-40 (2013-02-04 00:14:21 -0500)
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
>  git://git.pokylinux.org/linux-yocto-contrib kishore/cedartrail_remove
>  http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/linux-yocto-contrib/log/?h=kishore/cedartrail_remove
> 
> Kishore Bodke (1):
>  meta: Remove Cedartrail Machine
> 
> .../bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-preempt-rt.scc       |   13 ------
> .../bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-standard.scc         |    8 ----
> .../cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.cfg |   46 --------------------
> .../cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.scc |   15 -------
> 4 files changed, 82 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100755 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-preempt-rt.scc
> delete mode 100755 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-standard.scc
> delete mode 100755 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.cfg
> delete mode 100644 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.scc
> 
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Chris Tapp

opensource@keylevel.com
www.keylevel.com

Re: [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail Machine

[Bodke, Kishore K]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Chris Tapp [mailto:opensource@keylevel.com]
>Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 1:33 AM
>To: Bodke, Kishore K
>Cc: bruce.ashfield@windriver.com; dvhart@linux.intel.com; Saxena, Rahul;
>Liu, Song; Zanussi, Tom; linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org;
>yocto@yoctoproject.org
>Subject: Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail Machine
>
>
>On 8 Feb 2013, at 23:18, kishore.k.bodke@intel.com wrote:
>
>> From: Kishore Bodke <kishore.k.bodke@intel.com>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch set is to remove the Cedartail Machine from
>> Linux-yocto-3.4 Kernel.
>> Cedartrail BSP will not be supported for Yocto 1.4 Release.
>
>Hi Kishore,
>
>Are there any plans to bring support back in? We recently committed a project
>to using this BSP for the Intel DN2800MT...
>

Hi Chris,

The BSP is still available in 1.3 Release (danny).
Its from 1.4,  support is not available.

Thanks
Kishore.

>> Also Please remove the standard/cedartrail branch.
>>
>> Please pull into linux-yocto-3.4/meta branch.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Kishore.
>>
>> The following changes since commit
>f697e099bc76d5df3a307a5bc0cc25021dd6dfe0:
>>
>>  meta: bump to v3.4.28, rt-40 (2013-02-04 00:14:21 -0500)
>>
>> are available in the git repository at:
>>
>>  git://git.pokylinux.org/linux-yocto-contrib kishore/cedartrail_remove
>>  http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/linux-yocto-
>contrib/log/?h=kishore/cedartrail_remove
>>
>> Kishore Bodke (1):
>>  meta: Remove Cedartrail Machine
>>
>> .../bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-preempt-rt.scc       |   13 ------
>> .../bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-standard.scc         |    8 ----
>> .../cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.cfg |   46 --------------------
>> .../cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.scc |   15 -------
>> 4 files changed, 82 deletions(-)
>> delete mode 100755 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-
>preempt-rt.scc
>> delete mode 100755 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-
>standard.scc
>> delete mode 100755 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.cfg
>> delete mode 100644 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.scc
>>
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> yocto mailing list
>> yocto@yoctoproject.org
>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>
>Chris Tapp
>
>opensource@keylevel.com
>www.keylevel.com
>
>

Re: [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail Machine

[Bruce Ashfield]

On 13-02-08 6:18 PM, kishore.k.bodke@intel.com wrote:
> From: Kishore Bodke<kishore.k.bodke@intel.com>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> This patch set is to remove the Cedartail Machine from
> Linux-yocto-3.4 Kernel.
> Cedartrail BSP will not be supported for Yocto 1.4 Release.
>
> Also Please remove the standard/cedartrail branch.
>
> Please pull into linux-yocto-3.4/meta branch.

Ack'd. I'll merge and push this out on Monday.

Cheers,

Bruce

>
> Thanks
> Kishore.
>
> The following changes since commit f697e099bc76d5df3a307a5bc0cc25021dd6dfe0:
>
>    meta: bump to v3.4.28, rt-40 (2013-02-04 00:14:21 -0500)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
>    git://git.pokylinux.org/linux-yocto-contrib kishore/cedartrail_remove
>    http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/linux-yocto-contrib/log/?h=kishore/cedartrail_remove
>
> Kishore Bodke (1):
>    meta: Remove Cedartrail Machine
>
>   .../bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-preempt-rt.scc       |   13 ------
>   .../bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-standard.scc         |    8 ----
>   .../cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.cfg |   46 --------------------
>   .../cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.scc |   15 -------
>   4 files changed, 82 deletions(-)
>   delete mode 100755 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-preempt-rt.scc
>   delete mode 100755 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-standard.scc
>   delete mode 100755 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.cfg
>   delete mode 100644 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.scc
>

Re: [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail Machine

[Liu, Song]

Hi Chris,

Intel is still supporting critical fixes for the Cedar Trail BSP on Yocto Project 1.3 release. If you need additional support for your project, I can connect you with some Intel sales/support people who can help. At the same time, would you be able to share more information about your project with me? It will help when I ask them for additional support.

Song

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Tapp [mailto:opensource@keylevel.com] 
Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 1:33 AM
To: Bodke, Kishore K
Cc: bruce.ashfield@windriver.com; dvhart@linux.intel.com; Saxena, Rahul; Liu, Song; Zanussi, Tom; linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org; yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail Machine


On 8 Feb 2013, at 23:18, kishore.k.bodke@intel.com wrote:

> From: Kishore Bodke <kishore.k.bodke@intel.com>
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This patch set is to remove the Cedartail Machine from
> Linux-yocto-3.4 Kernel.
> Cedartrail BSP will not be supported for Yocto 1.4 Release.

Hi Kishore,

Are there any plans to bring support back in? We recently committed a project to using this BSP for the Intel DN2800MT...

> Also Please remove the standard/cedartrail branch.
> 
> Please pull into linux-yocto-3.4/meta branch.
> 
> Thanks
> Kishore.
> 
> The following changes since commit f697e099bc76d5df3a307a5bc0cc25021dd6dfe0:
> 
>  meta: bump to v3.4.28, rt-40 (2013-02-04 00:14:21 -0500)
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
>  git://git.pokylinux.org/linux-yocto-contrib kishore/cedartrail_remove  
> http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/linux-yocto-contrib/log/?h=kishore/c
> edartrail_remove
> 
> Kishore Bodke (1):
>  meta: Remove Cedartrail Machine
> 
> .../bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-preempt-rt.scc       |   13 ------
> .../bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-standard.scc         |    8 ----
> .../cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.cfg |   46 --------------------
> .../cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.scc |   15 -------
> 4 files changed, 82 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100755 
> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-preempt-rt.scc
> delete mode 100755 
> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-standard.scc
> delete mode 100755 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.cfg
> delete mode 100644 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.scc
> 
> --
> 1.7.9.5
> 
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Chris Tapp

opensource@keylevel.com
www.keylevel.com

Re: [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail Machine

[Chris Tapp]

Hi Song / Kishore,

On 11 Feb 2013, at 18:47, Liu, Song wrote:

> Hi Chris,
> 
> Intel is still supporting critical fixes for the Cedar Trail BSP on Yocto Project 1.3 release. If you need additional support for your project, I can connect you with some Intel sales/support people who can help. At the same time, would you be able to share more information about your project with me? It will help when I ask them for additional support.

Thanks, that's good news.

The only slight down side from my perspective is we won't get the benefits from 1.4 (and future) improvements. However, it will give me an excuse to move the hardware on as new platforms become available ;-)


> Song
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Tapp [mailto:opensource@keylevel.com] 
> Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 1:33 AM
> To: Bodke, Kishore K
> Cc: bruce.ashfield@windriver.com; dvhart@linux.intel.com; Saxena, Rahul; Liu, Song; Zanussi, Tom; linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org; yocto@yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail Machine
> 
> 
> On 8 Feb 2013, at 23:18, kishore.k.bodke@intel.com wrote:
> 
>> From: Kishore Bodke <kishore.k.bodke@intel.com>
>> 
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> This patch set is to remove the Cedartail Machine from
>> Linux-yocto-3.4 Kernel.
>> Cedartrail BSP will not be supported for Yocto 1.4 Release.
> 
> Hi Kishore,
> 
> Are there any plans to bring support back in? We recently committed a project to using this BSP for the Intel DN2800MT...
> 
>> Also Please remove the standard/cedartrail branch.
>> 
>> Please pull into linux-yocto-3.4/meta branch.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Kishore.
>> 
>> The following changes since commit f697e099bc76d5df3a307a5bc0cc25021dd6dfe0:
>> 
>> meta: bump to v3.4.28, rt-40 (2013-02-04 00:14:21 -0500)
>> 
>> are available in the git repository at:
>> 
>> git://git.pokylinux.org/linux-yocto-contrib kishore/cedartrail_remove  
>> http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/linux-yocto-contrib/log/?h=kishore/c
>> edartrail_remove
>> 
>> Kishore Bodke (1):
>> meta: Remove Cedartrail Machine
>> 
>> .../bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-preempt-rt.scc       |   13 ------
>> .../bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-standard.scc         |    8 ----
>> .../cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.cfg |   46 --------------------
>> .../cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.scc |   15 -------
>> 4 files changed, 82 deletions(-)
>> delete mode 100755 
>> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-preempt-rt.scc
>> delete mode 100755 
>> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-standard.scc
>> delete mode 100755 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.cfg
>> delete mode 100644 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.scc
>> 
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> yocto mailing list
>> yocto@yoctoproject.org
>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
> 
> Chris Tapp
> 
> opensource@keylevel.com
> www.keylevel.com
> 
> 
> 

Chris Tapp

opensource@keylevel.com
www.keylevel.com

Re: [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail Machine

[Liu, Song]

Thanks for the reply, Chris! Feel free to let us know if you have any questions. Hope your project will go well.

Song

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Tapp [mailto:opensource@keylevel.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 1:17 PM
To: Liu, Song
Cc: Bodke, Kishore K; Bruce Ashfield; Darren Hart; Saxena, Rahul; Zanussi, Tom; Yocto Discussion Mailing List
Subject: Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail Machine

Hi Song / Kishore,

On 11 Feb 2013, at 18:47, Liu, Song wrote:

> Hi Chris,
> 
> Intel is still supporting critical fixes for the Cedar Trail BSP on Yocto Project 1.3 release. If you need additional support for your project, I can connect you with some Intel sales/support people who can help. At the same time, would you be able to share more information about your project with me? It will help when I ask them for additional support.

Thanks, that's good news.

The only slight down side from my perspective is we won't get the benefits from 1.4 (and future) improvements. However, it will give me an excuse to move the hardware on as new platforms become available ;-)


> Song
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Tapp [mailto:opensource@keylevel.com]
> Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 1:33 AM
> To: Bodke, Kishore K
> Cc: bruce.ashfield@windriver.com; dvhart@linux.intel.com; Saxena, 
> Rahul; Liu, Song; Zanussi, Tom; linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org; 
> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail 
> Machine
> 
> 
> On 8 Feb 2013, at 23:18, kishore.k.bodke@intel.com wrote:
> 
>> From: Kishore Bodke <kishore.k.bodke@intel.com>
>> 
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> This patch set is to remove the Cedartail Machine from
>> Linux-yocto-3.4 Kernel.
>> Cedartrail BSP will not be supported for Yocto 1.4 Release.
> 
> Hi Kishore,
> 
> Are there any plans to bring support back in? We recently committed a project to using this BSP for the Intel DN2800MT...
> 
>> Also Please remove the standard/cedartrail branch.
>> 
>> Please pull into linux-yocto-3.4/meta branch.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Kishore.
>> 
>> The following changes since commit f697e099bc76d5df3a307a5bc0cc25021dd6dfe0:
>> 
>> meta: bump to v3.4.28, rt-40 (2013-02-04 00:14:21 -0500)
>> 
>> are available in the git repository at:
>> 
>> git://git.pokylinux.org/linux-yocto-contrib kishore/cedartrail_remove 
>> http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/linux-yocto-contrib/log/?h=kishore/
>> c
>> edartrail_remove
>> 
>> Kishore Bodke (1):
>> meta: Remove Cedartrail Machine
>> 
>> .../bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-preempt-rt.scc       |   13 ------
>> .../bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-standard.scc         |    8 ----
>> .../cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.cfg |   46 --------------------
>> .../cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.scc |   15 -------
>> 4 files changed, 82 deletions(-)
>> delete mode 100755
>> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-preempt-rt.scc
>> delete mode 100755
>> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-standard.scc
>> delete mode 100755 
>> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.cfg
>> delete mode 100644 
>> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.scc
>> 
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> yocto mailing list
>> yocto@yoctoproject.org
>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
> 
> Chris Tapp
> 
> opensource@keylevel.com
> www.keylevel.com
> 
> 
> 

Chris Tapp

opensource@keylevel.com
www.keylevel.com

Re: [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail Machine

[Sean Liming]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
> bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Liu, Song
> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 1:25 PM
> To: Chris Tapp
> Cc: Darren Hart; Yocto Discussion Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail Machine
> 
> Thanks for the reply, Chris! Feel free to let us know if you have any
> questions. Hope your project will go well.
> 
> Song
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Tapp [mailto:opensource@keylevel.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 1:17 PM
> To: Liu, Song
> Cc: Bodke, Kishore K; Bruce Ashfield; Darren Hart; Saxena, Rahul; Zanussi,
> Tom; Yocto Discussion Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail Machine
> 
> Hi Song / Kishore,
> 
> On 11 Feb 2013, at 18:47, Liu, Song wrote:
> 
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > Intel is still supporting critical fixes for the Cedar Trail BSP on
Yocto Project
> 1.3 release. If you need additional support for your project, I can
connect you
> with some Intel sales/support people who can help. At the same time, would
> you be able to share more information about your project with me? It will
> help when I ask them for additional support.
> 
> Thanks, that's good news.
> 
> The only slight down side from my perspective is we won't get the benefits
> from 1.4 (and future) improvements. However, it will give me an excuse to
> move the hardware on as new platforms become available ;-)
> 
> 
> > Song
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chris Tapp [mailto:opensource@keylevel.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 1:33 AM
> > To: Bodke, Kishore K
> > Cc: bruce.ashfield@windriver.com; dvhart@linux.intel.com; Saxena,
> > Rahul; Liu, Song; Zanussi, Tom; linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org;
> > yocto@yoctoproject.org
> > Subject: Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail
> > Machine
> >
> >
> > On 8 Feb 2013, at 23:18, kishore.k.bodke@intel.com wrote:
> >
> >> From: Kishore Bodke <kishore.k.bodke@intel.com>
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> This patch set is to remove the Cedartail Machine from
> >> Linux-yocto-3.4 Kernel.
> >> Cedartrail BSP will not be supported for Yocto 1.4 Release.
> >
> > Hi Kishore,
> >
> > Are there any plans to bring support back in? We recently committed a
> project to using this BSP for the Intel DN2800MT...
> >
> >> Also Please remove the standard/cedartrail branch.
> >>
> >> Please pull into linux-yocto-3.4/meta branch.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Kishore.
> >>
> >> The following changes since commit
> f697e099bc76d5df3a307a5bc0cc25021dd6dfe0:
> >>
> >> meta: bump to v3.4.28, rt-40 (2013-02-04 00:14:21 -0500)
> >>
> >> are available in the git repository at:
> >>
> >> git://git.pokylinux.org/linux-yocto-contrib kishore/cedartrail_remove
> >> http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/linux-yocto-contrib/log/?h=kishore/
> >> c
> >> edartrail_remove
> >>
> >> Kishore Bodke (1):
> >> meta: Remove Cedartrail Machine
> >>
> >> .../bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-preempt-rt.scc       |   13 ------
> >> .../bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-standard.scc         |    8 ----
> >> .../cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.cfg |   46
--------------------
> >> .../cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.scc |   15 -------
> >> 4 files changed, 82 deletions(-)
> >> delete mode 100755
> >> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-preempt-rt.scc
> >> delete mode 100755
> >> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-standard.scc
> >> delete mode 100755
> >> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.cfg
> >> delete mode 100644
> >> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.scc
> >>
> >> --
> >> 1.7.9.5
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> yocto mailing list
> >> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
> >
> > Chris Tapp
> >
> > opensource@keylevel.com
> > www.keylevel.com
> >
> >
> >
> 
> Chris Tapp
> 
> opensource@keylevel.com
> www.keylevel.com
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto


I haven't looked at the changes. Out of curiosity, is it possible to add a
BSP back in for a new Yocto Project version? What would be the challenge?

Regards,

Sean Liming

Re: [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail Machine

[Tom Zanussi]

On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 22:02 -0800, Sean Liming wrote:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
> > bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Liu, Song
> > Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 1:25 PM
> > To: Chris Tapp
> > Cc: Darren Hart; Yocto Discussion Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail Machine
> > 
> > Thanks for the reply, Chris! Feel free to let us know if you have any
> > questions. Hope your project will go well.
> > 
> > Song
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chris Tapp [mailto:opensource@keylevel.com]
> > Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 1:17 PM
> > To: Liu, Song
> > Cc: Bodke, Kishore K; Bruce Ashfield; Darren Hart; Saxena, Rahul; Zanussi,
> > Tom; Yocto Discussion Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail Machine
> > 
> > Hi Song / Kishore,
> > 
> > On 11 Feb 2013, at 18:47, Liu, Song wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Chris,
> > >
> > > Intel is still supporting critical fixes for the Cedar Trail BSP on
> Yocto Project
> > 1.3 release. If you need additional support for your project, I can
> connect you
> > with some Intel sales/support people who can help. At the same time, would
> > you be able to share more information about your project with me? It will
> > help when I ask them for additional support.
> > 
> > Thanks, that's good news.
> > 
> > The only slight down side from my perspective is we won't get the benefits
> > from 1.4 (and future) improvements. However, it will give me an excuse to
> > move the hardware on as new platforms become available ;-)
> > 
> > 
> > > Song
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Chris Tapp [mailto:opensource@keylevel.com]
> > > Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 1:33 AM
> > > To: Bodke, Kishore K
> > > Cc: bruce.ashfield@windriver.com; dvhart@linux.intel.com; Saxena,
> > > Rahul; Liu, Song; Zanussi, Tom; linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org;
> > > yocto@yoctoproject.org
> > > Subject: Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail
> > > Machine
> > >
> > >
> > > On 8 Feb 2013, at 23:18, kishore.k.bodke@intel.com wrote:
> > >
> > >> From: Kishore Bodke <kishore.k.bodke@intel.com>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> This patch set is to remove the Cedartail Machine from
> > >> Linux-yocto-3.4 Kernel.
> > >> Cedartrail BSP will not be supported for Yocto 1.4 Release.
> > >
> > > Hi Kishore,
> > >
> > > Are there any plans to bring support back in? We recently committed a
> > project to using this BSP for the Intel DN2800MT...
> > >
> > >> Also Please remove the standard/cedartrail branch.
> > >>
> > >> Please pull into linux-yocto-3.4/meta branch.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks
> > >> Kishore.
> > >>
> > >> The following changes since commit
> > f697e099bc76d5df3a307a5bc0cc25021dd6dfe0:
> > >>
> > >> meta: bump to v3.4.28, rt-40 (2013-02-04 00:14:21 -0500)
> > >>
> > >> are available in the git repository at:
> > >>
> > >> git://git.pokylinux.org/linux-yocto-contrib kishore/cedartrail_remove
> > >> http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/linux-yocto-contrib/log/?h=kishore/
> > >> c
> > >> edartrail_remove
> > >>
> > >> Kishore Bodke (1):
> > >> meta: Remove Cedartrail Machine
> > >>
> > >> .../bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-preempt-rt.scc       |   13 ------
> > >> .../bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-standard.scc         |    8 ----
> > >> .../cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.cfg |   46
> --------------------
> > >> .../cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.scc |   15 -------
> > >> 4 files changed, 82 deletions(-)
> > >> delete mode 100755
> > >> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-preempt-rt.scc
> > >> delete mode 100755
> > >> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-standard.scc
> > >> delete mode 100755
> > >> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.cfg
> > >> delete mode 100644
> > >> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.scc
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> 1.7.9.5
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> yocto mailing list
> > >> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> > >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
> > >
> > > Chris Tapp
> > >
> > > opensource@keylevel.com
> > > www.keylevel.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > Chris Tapp
> > 
> > opensource@keylevel.com
> > www.keylevel.com
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > yocto mailing list
> > yocto@yoctoproject.org
> > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
> 
> 
> I haven't looked at the changes. Out of curiosity, is it possible to add a
> BSP back in for a new Yocto Project version? What would be the challenge?
> 

It probably wouldn't take much to bring it back - basically the pvr
graphics driver, which I assume is one of the most important features of
this BSP for users, is stuck at kernel version 3.0.  If everything else
stayed the same, forward-porting the GPL'ed kernel portion of the driver
would be all that would be needed to get it working again.  We've done
that routinely for other drivers such as EMGD, so I don't think that
would be too big a deal.

The bigger problem is who would support it going forward.  I could do
the initial work to fix it up (if I had the hardware, which I don't - I
may get a cedartrail netbook in March, so that ) (or we could take
patches) but I wouldn't have the time to support it after that.

If someone stepped up to support it, though, that would make a
difference in keeping it around in 1.4 and beyond, I think.

Tom

> Regards,
> 
> Sean Liming
> 
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail Machine

[Burton, Ross]

On 12 February 2013 19:56, Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@intel.com> wrote:
> It probably wouldn't take much to bring it back - basically the pvr
> graphics driver, which I assume is one of the most important features of
> this BSP for users, is stuck at kernel version 3.0.  If everything else
> stayed the same, forward-porting the GPL'ed kernel portion of the driver
> would be all that would be needed to get it working again.  We've done
> that routinely for other drivers such as EMGD, so I don't think that
> would be too big a deal.

Alternatively there's the fully open source but non-accelerated
graphics drivers.  This would let the BSP survive, but is anyone
(Chris, I'm looking at you here!) using CDT in a situation where the
open 2D driver is sufficient?

Ross

Re: [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail Machine

[Chris Tapp]

On 12 Feb 2013, at 20:54, Burton, Ross wrote:

> On 12 February 2013 19:56, Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@intel.com> wrote:
>> It probably wouldn't take much to bring it back - basically the pvr
>> graphics driver, which I assume is one of the most important features of
>> this BSP for users, is stuck at kernel version 3.0.  If everything else
>> stayed the same, forward-porting the GPL'ed kernel portion of the driver
>> would be all that would be needed to get it working again.  We've done
>> that routinely for other drivers such as EMGD, so I don't think that
>> would be too big a deal.
> 
> Alternatively there's the fully open source but non-accelerated
> graphics drivers.  This would let the BSP survive, but is anyone
> (Chris, I'm looking at you here!) using CDT in a situation where the
> open 2D driver is sufficient?

Not me ;-) One of the main reasons I moved 'here' was because we needed the graphics performance.

> Ross

Chris Tapp

opensource@keylevel.com
www.keylevel.com

Re: [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail Machine

[Burton, Ross]

On 12 February 2013 21:29, Chris Tapp <opensource@keylevel.com> wrote:
>> Alternatively there's the fully open source but non-accelerated
>> graphics drivers.  This would let the BSP survive, but is anyone
>> (Chris, I'm looking at you here!) using CDT in a situation where the
>> open 2D driver is sufficient?
>
> Not me ;-) One of the main reasons I moved 'here' was because we needed the graphics performance.

I'll do my best to keep 1.3 going until Valley View then! :)

Ross

Re: [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail Machine

[Chris Tapp]

On 12 Feb 2013, at 19:56, Tom Zanussi wrote:

> On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 22:02 -0800, Sean Liming wrote:
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
>>> bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Liu, Song
>>> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 1:25 PM
>>> To: Chris Tapp
>>> Cc: Darren Hart; Yocto Discussion Mailing List
>>> Subject: Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail Machine
>>> 
>>> Thanks for the reply, Chris! Feel free to let us know if you have any
>>> questions. Hope your project will go well.
>>> 
>>> Song
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Chris Tapp [mailto:opensource@keylevel.com]
>>> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 1:17 PM
>>> To: Liu, Song
>>> Cc: Bodke, Kishore K; Bruce Ashfield; Darren Hart; Saxena, Rahul; Zanussi,
>>> Tom; Yocto Discussion Mailing List
>>> Subject: Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail Machine
>>> 
>>> Hi Song / Kishore,
>>> 
>>> On 11 Feb 2013, at 18:47, Liu, Song wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi Chris,
>>>> 
>>>> Intel is still supporting critical fixes for the Cedar Trail BSP on
>> Yocto Project
>>> 1.3 release. If you need additional support for your project, I can
>> connect you
>>> with some Intel sales/support people who can help. At the same time, would
>>> you be able to share more information about your project with me? It will
>>> help when I ask them for additional support.
>>> 
>>> Thanks, that's good news.
>>> 
>>> The only slight down side from my perspective is we won't get the benefits
>>> from 1.4 (and future) improvements. However, it will give me an excuse to
>>> move the hardware on as new platforms become available ;-)
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Song
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Chris Tapp [mailto:opensource@keylevel.com]
>>>> Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 1:33 AM
>>>> To: Bodke, Kishore K
>>>> Cc: bruce.ashfield@windriver.com; dvhart@linux.intel.com; Saxena,
>>>> Rahul; Liu, Song; Zanussi, Tom; linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org;
>>>> yocto@yoctoproject.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail
>>>> Machine
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 8 Feb 2013, at 23:18, kishore.k.bodke@intel.com wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> From: Kishore Bodke <kishore.k.bodke@intel.com>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> This patch set is to remove the Cedartail Machine from
>>>>> Linux-yocto-3.4 Kernel.
>>>>> Cedartrail BSP will not be supported for Yocto 1.4 Release.
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Kishore,
>>>> 
>>>> Are there any plans to bring support back in? We recently committed a
>>> project to using this BSP for the Intel DN2800MT...
>>>> 
>>>>> Also Please remove the standard/cedartrail branch.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please pull into linux-yocto-3.4/meta branch.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Kishore.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The following changes since commit
>>> f697e099bc76d5df3a307a5bc0cc25021dd6dfe0:
>>>>> 
>>>>> meta: bump to v3.4.28, rt-40 (2013-02-04 00:14:21 -0500)
>>>>> 
>>>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>>> 
>>>>> git://git.pokylinux.org/linux-yocto-contrib kishore/cedartrail_remove
>>>>> http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/linux-yocto-contrib/log/?h=kishore/
>>>>> c
>>>>> edartrail_remove
>>>>> 
>>>>> Kishore Bodke (1):
>>>>> meta: Remove Cedartrail Machine
>>>>> 
>>>>> .../bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-preempt-rt.scc       |   13 ------
>>>>> .../bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-standard.scc         |    8 ----
>>>>> .../cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.cfg |   46
>> --------------------
>>>>> .../cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.scc |   15 -------
>>>>> 4 files changed, 82 deletions(-)
>>>>> delete mode 100755
>>>>> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-preempt-rt.scc
>>>>> delete mode 100755
>>>>> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-standard.scc
>>>>> delete mode 100755
>>>>> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.cfg
>>>>> delete mode 100644
>>>>> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.scc
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> 1.7.9.5
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> yocto mailing list
>>>>> yocto@yoctoproject.org
>>>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>>>> 
>>>> Chris Tapp
>>>> 
>>>> opensource@keylevel.com
>>>> www.keylevel.com
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Chris Tapp
>>> 
>>> opensource@keylevel.com
>>> www.keylevel.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> yocto mailing list
>>> yocto@yoctoproject.org
>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>> 
>> 
>> I haven't looked at the changes. Out of curiosity, is it possible to add a
>> BSP back in for a new Yocto Project version? What would be the challenge?
>> 
> 
> It probably wouldn't take much to bring it back - basically the pvr
> graphics driver, which I assume is one of the most important features of
> this BSP for users, is stuck at kernel version 3.0.  If everything else
> stayed the same, forward-porting the GPL'ed kernel portion of the driver
> would be all that would be needed to get it working again.  We've done
> that routinely for other drivers such as EMGD, so I don't think that
> would be too big a deal.

Would that mean only non-accelerated graphics? I remember someone on this list a while back saying they had seen it ported to (I think) 3.2 under a main-stream distro.

> The bigger problem is who would support it going forward.  I could do
> the initial work to fix it up (if I had the hardware, which I don't - I
> may get a cedartrail netbook in March, so that ) (or we could take
> patches) but I wouldn't have the time to support it after that.
> 
> If someone stepped up to support it, though, that would make a
> difference in keeping it around in 1.4 and beyond, I think.

What would that involve? Is it fairly stand-alone, or would in-depth knowledge of the kernel 'magic' be required?

> Tom
> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Sean Liming
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> yocto mailing list
>> yocto@yoctoproject.org
>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
> 
> 

Chris Tapp

opensource@keylevel.com
www.keylevel.com

Re: [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail Machine

[Bodke, Kishore K]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
>bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Chris Tapp
>Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 1:35 PM
>To: Zanussi, Tom
>Cc: 'Yocto Discussion Mailing List'; 'Darren Hart'
>Subject: Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail Machine
>
>
>On 12 Feb 2013, at 19:56, Tom Zanussi wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 22:02 -0800, Sean Liming wrote:
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
>>>> bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Liu, Song
>>>> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 1:25 PM
>>>> To: Chris Tapp
>>>> Cc: Darren Hart; Yocto Discussion Mailing List
>>>> Subject: Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail Machine
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the reply, Chris! Feel free to let us know if you have any
>>>> questions. Hope your project will go well.
>>>>
>>>> Song
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Chris Tapp [mailto:opensource@keylevel.com]
>>>> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 1:17 PM
>>>> To: Liu, Song
>>>> Cc: Bodke, Kishore K; Bruce Ashfield; Darren Hart; Saxena, Rahul; Zanussi,
>>>> Tom; Yocto Discussion Mailing List
>>>> Subject: Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail Machine
>>>>
>>>> Hi Song / Kishore,
>>>>
>>>> On 11 Feb 2013, at 18:47, Liu, Song wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Chris,
>>>>>
>>>>> Intel is still supporting critical fixes for the Cedar Trail BSP on
>>> Yocto Project
>>>> 1.3 release. If you need additional support for your project, I can
>>> connect you
>>>> with some Intel sales/support people who can help. At the same time,
>would
>>>> you be able to share more information about your project with me? It will
>>>> help when I ask them for additional support.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, that's good news.
>>>>
>>>> The only slight down side from my perspective is we won't get the
>benefits
>>>> from 1.4 (and future) improvements. However, it will give me an excuse
>to
>>>> move the hardware on as new platforms become available ;-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Song
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Chris Tapp [mailto:opensource@keylevel.com]
>>>>> Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 1:33 AM
>>>>> To: Bodke, Kishore K
>>>>> Cc: bruce.ashfield@windriver.com; dvhart@linux.intel.com; Saxena,
>>>>> Rahul; Liu, Song; Zanussi, Tom; linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org;
>>>>> yocto@yoctoproject.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail
>>>>> Machine
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 8 Feb 2013, at 23:18, kishore.k.bodke@intel.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Kishore Bodke <kishore.k.bodke@intel.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patch set is to remove the Cedartail Machine from
>>>>>> Linux-yocto-3.4 Kernel.
>>>>>> Cedartrail BSP will not be supported for Yocto 1.4 Release.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Kishore,
>>>>>
>>>>> Are there any plans to bring support back in? We recently committed a
>>>> project to using this BSP for the Intel DN2800MT...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Also Please remove the standard/cedartrail branch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please pull into linux-yocto-3.4/meta branch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> Kishore.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The following changes since commit
>>>> f697e099bc76d5df3a307a5bc0cc25021dd6dfe0:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> meta: bump to v3.4.28, rt-40 (2013-02-04 00:14:21 -0500)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> git://git.pokylinux.org/linux-yocto-contrib kishore/cedartrail_remove
>>>>>> http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/linux-yocto-contrib/log/?h=kishore/
>>>>>> c
>>>>>> edartrail_remove
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kishore Bodke (1):
>>>>>> meta: Remove Cedartrail Machine
>>>>>>
>>>>>> .../bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-preempt-rt.scc       |   13 ------
>>>>>> .../bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-standard.scc         |    8 ----
>>>>>> .../cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.cfg |   46
>>> --------------------
>>>>>> .../cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.scc |   15 -------
>>>>>> 4 files changed, 82 deletions(-)
>>>>>> delete mode 100755
>>>>>> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-preempt-rt.scc
>>>>>> delete mode 100755
>>>>>> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-standard.scc
>>>>>> delete mode 100755
>>>>>> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.cfg
>>>>>> delete mode 100644
>>>>>> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.scc
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 1.7.9.5
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> yocto mailing list
>>>>>> yocto@yoctoproject.org
>>>>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>>>>>
>>>>> Chris Tapp
>>>>>
>>>>> opensource@keylevel.com
>>>>> www.keylevel.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Chris Tapp
>>>>
>>>> opensource@keylevel.com
>>>> www.keylevel.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> yocto mailing list
>>>> yocto@yoctoproject.org
>>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>>>
>>>
>>> I haven't looked at the changes. Out of curiosity, is it possible to add a
>>> BSP back in for a new Yocto Project version? What would be the challenge?
>>>
>>
>> It probably wouldn't take much to bring it back - basically the pvr
>> graphics driver, which I assume is one of the most important features of
>> this BSP for users, is stuck at kernel version 3.0.  If everything else
>> stayed the same, forward-porting the GPL'ed kernel portion of the driver
>> would be all that would be needed to get it working again.  We've done
>> that routinely for other drivers such as EMGD, so I don't think that
>> would be too big a deal.
>
>Would that mean only non-accelerated graphics? I remember someone on
>this list a while back saying they had seen it ported to (I think) 3.2 under a
>main-stream distro.
>
>> The bigger problem is who would support it going forward.  I could do
>> the initial work to fix it up (if I had the hardware, which I don't - I
>> may get a cedartrail netbook in March, so that ) (or we could take
>> patches) but I wouldn't have the time to support it after that.
>>
>> If someone stepped up to support it, though, that would make a
>> difference in keeping it around in 1.4 and beyond, I think.
>
>What would that involve? Is it fairly stand-alone, or would in-depth
>knowledge of the kernel 'magic' be required?

Too early to tell anything on valleyview.

>
>> Tom
>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Sean Liming
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> yocto mailing list
>>> yocto@yoctoproject.org
>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>>
>>
>
>Chris Tapp
>
>opensource@keylevel.com
>www.keylevel.com
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>yocto mailing list
>yocto@yoctoproject.org
>https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail Machine

[Tom Zanussi]

On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 21:34 +0000, Chris Tapp wrote:
> On 12 Feb 2013, at 19:56, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 22:02 -0800, Sean Liming wrote:
> >> 
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
> >>> bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Liu, Song
> >>> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 1:25 PM
> >>> To: Chris Tapp
> >>> Cc: Darren Hart; Yocto Discussion Mailing List
> >>> Subject: Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail Machine
> >>> 
> >>> Thanks for the reply, Chris! Feel free to let us know if you have any
> >>> questions. Hope your project will go well.
> >>> 
> >>> Song
> >>> 
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Chris Tapp [mailto:opensource@keylevel.com]
> >>> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 1:17 PM
> >>> To: Liu, Song
> >>> Cc: Bodke, Kishore K; Bruce Ashfield; Darren Hart; Saxena, Rahul; Zanussi,
> >>> Tom; Yocto Discussion Mailing List
> >>> Subject: Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail Machine
> >>> 
> >>> Hi Song / Kishore,
> >>> 
> >>> On 11 Feb 2013, at 18:47, Liu, Song wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>> Hi Chris,
> >>>> 
> >>>> Intel is still supporting critical fixes for the Cedar Trail BSP on
> >> Yocto Project
> >>> 1.3 release. If you need additional support for your project, I can
> >> connect you
> >>> with some Intel sales/support people who can help. At the same time, would
> >>> you be able to share more information about your project with me? It will
> >>> help when I ask them for additional support.
> >>> 
> >>> Thanks, that's good news.
> >>> 
> >>> The only slight down side from my perspective is we won't get the benefits
> >>> from 1.4 (and future) improvements. However, it will give me an excuse to
> >>> move the hardware on as new platforms become available ;-)
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>>> Song
> >>>> 
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Chris Tapp [mailto:opensource@keylevel.com]
> >>>> Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 1:33 AM
> >>>> To: Bodke, Kishore K
> >>>> Cc: bruce.ashfield@windriver.com; dvhart@linux.intel.com; Saxena,
> >>>> Rahul; Liu, Song; Zanussi, Tom; linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org;
> >>>> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> >>>> Subject: Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1][linux-yocto] Remove Cedartrail
> >>>> Machine
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> On 8 Feb 2013, at 23:18, kishore.k.bodke@intel.com wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>>> From: Kishore Bodke <kishore.k.bodke@intel.com>
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> This patch set is to remove the Cedartail Machine from
> >>>>> Linux-yocto-3.4 Kernel.
> >>>>> Cedartrail BSP will not be supported for Yocto 1.4 Release.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Hi Kishore,
> >>>> 
> >>>> Are there any plans to bring support back in? We recently committed a
> >>> project to using this BSP for the Intel DN2800MT...
> >>>> 
> >>>>> Also Please remove the standard/cedartrail branch.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Please pull into linux-yocto-3.4/meta branch.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Thanks
> >>>>> Kishore.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> The following changes since commit
> >>> f697e099bc76d5df3a307a5bc0cc25021dd6dfe0:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> meta: bump to v3.4.28, rt-40 (2013-02-04 00:14:21 -0500)
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> are available in the git repository at:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> git://git.pokylinux.org/linux-yocto-contrib kishore/cedartrail_remove
> >>>>> http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/linux-yocto-contrib/log/?h=kishore/
> >>>>> c
> >>>>> edartrail_remove
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Kishore Bodke (1):
> >>>>> meta: Remove Cedartrail Machine
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> .../bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-preempt-rt.scc       |   13 ------
> >>>>> .../bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-standard.scc         |    8 ----
> >>>>> .../cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.cfg |   46
> >> --------------------
> >>>>> .../cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.scc |   15 -------
> >>>>> 4 files changed, 82 deletions(-)
> >>>>> delete mode 100755
> >>>>> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-preempt-rt.scc
> >>>>> delete mode 100755
> >>>>> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail-standard.scc
> >>>>> delete mode 100755
> >>>>> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.cfg
> >>>>> delete mode 100644
> >>>>> meta/cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/cedartrail/cedartrail.scc
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> 1.7.9.5
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> yocto mailing list
> >>>>> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> >>>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
> >>>> 
> >>>> Chris Tapp
> >>>> 
> >>>> opensource@keylevel.com
> >>>> www.keylevel.com
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>> 
> >>> Chris Tapp
> >>> 
> >>> opensource@keylevel.com
> >>> www.keylevel.com
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> yocto mailing list
> >>> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> >>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
> >> 
> >> 
> >> I haven't looked at the changes. Out of curiosity, is it possible to add a
> >> BSP back in for a new Yocto Project version? What would be the challenge?
> >> 
> > 
> > It probably wouldn't take much to bring it back - basically the pvr
> > graphics driver, which I assume is one of the most important features of
> > this BSP for users, is stuck at kernel version 3.0.  If everything else
> > stayed the same, forward-porting the GPL'ed kernel portion of the driver
> > would be all that would be needed to get it working again.  We've done
> > that routinely for other drivers such as EMGD, so I don't think that
> > would be too big a deal.
> 
> Would that mean only non-accelerated graphics? I remember someone on this list a while back saying they had seen it ported to (I think) 3.2 under a main-stream distro.
> 

No, the value is in the accelerated graphics and the effort would be to
keep that going - nobody cares about the non-accelerated (or that I've
heard anyway).

I didn't realize there were already ports past 3.0 for the pvr driver
out there - so much the easier if that's the case.

> > The bigger problem is who would support it going forward.  I could do
> > the initial work to fix it up (if I had the hardware, which I don't - I
> > may get a cedartrail netbook in March, so that ) (or we could take
> > patches) but I wouldn't have the time to support it after that.
> > 
> > If someone stepped up to support it, though, that would make a
> > difference in keeping it around in 1.4 and beyond, I think.
> 
> What would that involve? Is it fairly stand-alone, or would in-depth knowledge of the kernel 'magic' be required?
> 

Basically it would entail keeping it building and responding to and
fixing user problems.  The 'kernel magic' knowledge should only come
into play when moving to a new kernel version, but also if there were
problems that were rooted in the kernel or required debugging the kernel
portion.

Maybe the current maintainer could shed some light on the kinds of
problems they've had to deal with from users - my impression is that
it's along the lines of 'the pvr driver doesn't work with my LVDS panel'
and things like that.  Which can be a huge time sink to have to deal
with...

As for anything kernel-related that came up, I believe that was mostly
handled by the Intel team that wrote the driver, whose support we'd no
longer have (and is the main reason the BSP is being abandoned IIRC).
Obviously with them out of the picture, the new maintainer (with help
from the Yocto team I presume and would volunteer to help with) would
have to take on that role.

Tom

> > Tom
> > 
> >> Regards,
> >> 
> >> Sean Liming
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> yocto mailing list
> >> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
> > 
> > 
> 
> Chris Tapp
> 
> opensource@keylevel.com
> www.keylevel.com
> 
> 
>