All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dirk.behme@de.bosch.com (Dirk Behme)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: i.MX6 Solo: maxcpus=1 vs. nosmp: Warning from smp_twd.c?
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 15:47:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <511CF916.2060705@de.bosch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOMZO5CTfzZxRNQF=x5-MkM4nGBOXRd0CN7OnO1p=ahHDoT8CQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 14.02.2013 15:40, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Dirk,
> 
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@de.bosch.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> working on a i.MX6 Solo SoC (one Cortex A9 core) we are usually booting with
>> maxcpus=1 a kernel built with CONFIG_NR_CPUS=4. This is done to be able to
>> boot the same kernel on the Solo and Quad version of that SoC.
>>
>> Now, we tried to switch from 'maxcpus=1' to 'nosmp'. With 'nosmp' we get the
>> warning [1] in the boot messages. This isn't there with 'maxcpus=1'.
> 
> maxcpus=1 and nosmp are not equivalent as per the comment from kernel/smp.c:
> 
> /*
>  * Setup routine for controlling SMP activation
>  *
>  * Command-line option of "nosmp" or "maxcpus=0" will disable SMP
>  * activation entirely (the MPS table probe still happens, though).
>  *
>  * Command-line option of "maxcpus=<NUM>", where <NUM> is an integer
>  * greater than 0, limits the maximum number of CPUs activated in
>  * SMP mode to <NUM>.
>  */

Yes, understood that both options are not equal.

But should both options work on a single ARM Cortex A9 SoC without a 
warning? Or should one of the both options be preferred on a single ARM 
Cortex A9 SoC?

Thanks

Dirk

      reply	other threads:[~2013-02-14 14:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-14 14:10 i.MX6 Solo: maxcpus=1 vs. nosmp: Warning from smp_twd.c? Dirk Behme
2013-02-14 14:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-15  9:25   ` Dirk Behme
2013-02-18  2:50   ` Shawn Guo
2013-02-21  7:16     ` Dirk Behme
2013-02-21  7:29       ` Shawn Guo
2013-02-14 14:40 ` Fabio Estevam
2013-02-14 14:47   ` Dirk Behme [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=511CF916.2060705@de.bosch.com \
    --to=dirk.behme@de.bosch.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.