From: Glauber Costa <glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Kamezawa Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Andrew Morton
<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
Dave Shrinnker <david-FqsqvQoI3Ljby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org>,
linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Dave Chinner <dchinner-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] vmscan: also shrink slab in memcg pressure
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:30:14 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <511E0E36.3060206@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <511DF3CB.7020206-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
>> @@ -45,6 +48,7 @@ struct shrinker {
>>
>> int seeks; /* seeks to recreate an obj */
>> long batch; /* reclaim batch size, 0 = default */
>> + bool memcg_shrinker;
>>
>
> What is this boolean for ? When is this set ?
It is set when a subsystem declares that its shrinker is memcg capable.
Therefore, it won't be done until all infrastructure is in place. Take a
look at the super.c patches at the end of the series.
>> static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
>> {
>> return true;
>> }
>> +
>> +static bool has_kmem_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
>> +{
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static unsigned long
>> +zone_nr_reclaimable_pages(struct scan_control *sc, struct zone *zone)
>> +{
>> + return zone_reclaimable_pages(zone);
>> +}
>> #endif
>
> Can't be in a devided patch ?
>
if you prefer this way, sure, I can separate it.
>> static unsigned long get_lru_size(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum lru_list lru)
>> @@ -221,6 +252,9 @@ unsigned long shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *sc,
>> long batch_size = shrinker->batch ? shrinker->batch
>> : SHRINK_BATCH;
>>
>> + if (!shrinker->memcg_shrinker && sc->target_mem_cgroup)
>> + continue;
>> +
>
> What does this mean ?
It means that if target_mem_cgroup is set, we should skip all the
shrinkers that are not memcg capable. Maybe if I invert the order it
will be clearer?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Glauber Costa <glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Kamezawa Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: <linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
<cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Andrew Morton
<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
Dave Shrinnker <david-FqsqvQoI3Ljby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org>,
<linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] vmscan: also shrink slab in memcg pressure
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:30:14 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <511E0E36.3060206@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <511DF3CB.7020206-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
>> @@ -45,6 +48,7 @@ struct shrinker {
>>
>> int seeks; /* seeks to recreate an obj */
>> long batch; /* reclaim batch size, 0 = default */
>> + bool memcg_shrinker;
>>
>
> What is this boolean for ? When is this set ?
It is set when a subsystem declares that its shrinker is memcg capable.
Therefore, it won't be done until all infrastructure is in place. Take a
look at the super.c patches at the end of the series.
>> static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
>> {
>> return true;
>> }
>> +
>> +static bool has_kmem_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
>> +{
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static unsigned long
>> +zone_nr_reclaimable_pages(struct scan_control *sc, struct zone *zone)
>> +{
>> + return zone_reclaimable_pages(zone);
>> +}
>> #endif
>
> Can't be in a devided patch ?
>
if you prefer this way, sure, I can separate it.
>> static unsigned long get_lru_size(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum lru_list lru)
>> @@ -221,6 +252,9 @@ unsigned long shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *sc,
>> long batch_size = shrinker->batch ? shrinker->batch
>> : SHRINK_BATCH;
>>
>> + if (!shrinker->memcg_shrinker && sc->target_mem_cgroup)
>> + continue;
>> +
>
> What does this mean ?
It means that if target_mem_cgroup is set, we should skip all the
shrinkers that are not memcg capable. Maybe if I invert the order it
will be clearer?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Dave Shrinnker <david@fromorbit.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] vmscan: also shrink slab in memcg pressure
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:30:14 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <511E0E36.3060206@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <511DF3CB.7020206@jp.fujitsu.com>
>> @@ -45,6 +48,7 @@ struct shrinker {
>>
>> int seeks; /* seeks to recreate an obj */
>> long batch; /* reclaim batch size, 0 = default */
>> + bool memcg_shrinker;
>>
>
> What is this boolean for ? When is this set ?
It is set when a subsystem declares that its shrinker is memcg capable.
Therefore, it won't be done until all infrastructure is in place. Take a
look at the super.c patches at the end of the series.
>> static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
>> {
>> return true;
>> }
>> +
>> +static bool has_kmem_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
>> +{
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static unsigned long
>> +zone_nr_reclaimable_pages(struct scan_control *sc, struct zone *zone)
>> +{
>> + return zone_reclaimable_pages(zone);
>> +}
>> #endif
>
> Can't be in a devided patch ?
>
if you prefer this way, sure, I can separate it.
>> static unsigned long get_lru_size(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum lru_list lru)
>> @@ -221,6 +252,9 @@ unsigned long shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *sc,
>> long batch_size = shrinker->batch ? shrinker->batch
>> : SHRINK_BATCH;
>>
>> + if (!shrinker->memcg_shrinker && sc->target_mem_cgroup)
>> + continue;
>> +
>
> What does this mean ?
It means that if target_mem_cgroup is set, we should skip all the
shrinkers that are not memcg capable. Maybe if I invert the order it
will be clearer?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-15 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-08 13:07 [PATCH 0/7] memcg targeted shrinking Glauber Costa
2013-02-08 13:07 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-08 13:07 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-08 13:07 ` [PATCH 1/7] vmscan: also shrink slab in memcg pressure Glauber Costa
2013-02-08 13:07 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-08 13:07 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-15 1:27 ` Greg Thelen
2013-02-15 1:27 ` Greg Thelen
2013-02-15 1:27 ` Greg Thelen
2013-02-15 10:46 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-15 10:46 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-15 10:46 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-15 8:37 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-02-15 8:37 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
[not found] ` <511DF3CB.7020206-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-15 10:30 ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2013-02-15 10:30 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-15 10:30 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-08 13:07 ` [PATCH 2/7] memcg,list_lru: duplicate LRUs upon kmemcg creation Glauber Costa
2013-02-08 13:07 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-08 13:07 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-15 1:31 ` Greg Thelen
2013-02-15 1:31 ` Greg Thelen
2013-02-15 1:31 ` Greg Thelen
[not found] ` <xr934nhenz18.fsf-aSPv4SP+Du0KgorLzL7FmE7CuiCeIGUxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-15 10:54 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-15 10:54 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-15 10:54 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-20 7:46 ` Greg Thelen
2013-02-20 7:46 ` Greg Thelen
2013-02-20 7:46 ` Greg Thelen
[not found] ` <1360328857-28070-3-git-send-email-glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-15 9:21 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-02-15 9:21 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-02-15 10:36 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-15 10:36 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-15 10:36 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-08 13:07 ` [PATCH 3/7] lru: add an element to a memcg list Glauber Costa
2013-02-08 13:07 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-08 13:07 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-15 1:32 ` Greg Thelen
2013-02-15 1:32 ` Greg Thelen
[not found] ` <xr93txpemkeo.fsf-aSPv4SP+Du0KgorLzL7FmE7CuiCeIGUxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-15 10:57 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-15 10:57 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-15 10:57 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-08 13:07 ` [PATCH 4/7] list_lru: also include memcg lists in counts and scans Glauber Costa
2013-02-08 13:07 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-08 13:07 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-08 13:07 ` [PATCH 5/7] list_lru: per-memcg walks Glauber Costa
2013-02-08 13:07 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-08 13:07 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-08 13:07 ` [PATCH 6/7] super: targeted memcg reclaim Glauber Costa
2013-02-08 13:07 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-08 13:07 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-08 13:07 ` [PATCH 7/7] memcg: per-memcg kmem shrinking Glauber Costa
2013-02-08 13:07 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-08 13:07 ` Glauber Costa
[not found] ` <1360328857-28070-1-git-send-email-glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-15 1:28 ` [PATCH 0/7] memcg targeted shrinking Greg Thelen
2013-02-15 1:28 ` Greg Thelen
2013-02-15 1:28 ` Greg Thelen
[not found] ` <xr93ip5unz52.fsf-aSPv4SP+Du0KgorLzL7FmE7CuiCeIGUxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-15 10:42 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-15 10:42 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-15 10:42 ` Glauber Costa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=511E0E36.3060206@parallels.com \
--to=glommer-bzqdu9zft3wakbo8gow8eq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=david-FqsqvQoI3Ljby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dchinner-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hughd-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mgorman-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=riel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.