From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: Afzal Mohammed <afzal@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>,
Syed Mohammed Khasim <khasim@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC 1/8] ARM: localtimer: return percpu clkevt on register
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:52:02 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5123524A.9080300@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e7cbb10903841ba23a93f71e7a06ae34a43adc70.1361186097.git.afzal@ti.com>
On Monday 18 February 2013 05:06 PM, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
> Return percpu clock event on local timer register. It is the boot cpu
> that calls this and it can use the returned percpu clock event to
> register a clock event in the case of SMP configuration with one core.
SMP configuration with 1 core is UP :-)
Jokes apart as said already, lets see whether we really need it.
Regards,
Santosh
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH, RFC 1/8] ARM: localtimer: return percpu clkevt on register
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:52:02 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5123524A.9080300@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e7cbb10903841ba23a93f71e7a06ae34a43adc70.1361186097.git.afzal@ti.com>
On Monday 18 February 2013 05:06 PM, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
> Return percpu clock event on local timer register. It is the boot cpu
> that calls this and it can use the returned percpu clock event to
> register a clock event in the case of SMP configuration with one core.
SMP configuration with 1 core is UP :-)
Jokes apart as said already, lets see whether we really need it.
Regards,
Santosh
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: Afzal Mohammed <afzal@ti.com>
Cc: <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
<linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>,
Syed Mohammed Khasim <khasim@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC 1/8] ARM: localtimer: return percpu clkevt on register
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:52:02 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5123524A.9080300@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e7cbb10903841ba23a93f71e7a06ae34a43adc70.1361186097.git.afzal@ti.com>
On Monday 18 February 2013 05:06 PM, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
> Return percpu clock event on local timer register. It is the boot cpu
> that calls this and it can use the returned percpu clock event to
> register a clock event in the case of SMP configuration with one core.
SMP configuration with 1 core is UP :-)
Jokes apart as said already, lets see whether we really need it.
Regards,
Santosh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-19 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-18 11:35 [PATCH, RFC 0/8] ARM: AM43 (OMAP2+) boot support Afzal Mohammed
2013-02-18 11:35 ` Afzal Mohammed
2013-02-18 11:35 ` Afzal Mohammed
2013-02-18 11:36 ` [PATCH, RFC 1/8] ARM: localtimer: return percpu clkevt on register Afzal Mohammed
2013-02-18 11:36 ` Afzal Mohammed
2013-02-18 11:36 ` Afzal Mohammed
2013-02-19 10:22 ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2013-02-19 10:22 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-19 10:22 ` Santosh Shilimkar
[not found] ` <e7cbb10903841ba23a93f71e7a06ae34a43adc70.1361186097.git.afzal-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-19 12:10 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 12:10 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 12:10 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-18 11:37 ` [PATCH, RFC 2/8] ARM: twd: register clock event for 1 core SMP Afzal Mohammed
2013-02-18 11:37 ` Afzal Mohammed
2013-02-18 11:37 ` Afzal Mohammed
2013-02-19 10:14 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-19 10:14 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-19 10:14 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-19 12:14 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 12:14 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 12:14 ` Felipe Balbi
[not found] ` <20130219121400.GP23197-S8G//mZuvNWo5Im9Ml3/Zg@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-19 12:20 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-19 12:20 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-19 12:20 ` Santosh Shilimkar
[not found] ` <cover.1361186097.git.afzal-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-18 11:37 ` [PATCH, RFC 3/8] ARM: twd: clock rate from DT (if no DT clk tree) Afzal Mohammed
2013-02-18 11:37 ` Afzal Mohammed
2013-02-18 11:37 ` Afzal Mohammed
2013-02-19 10:18 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-19 10:18 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-19 10:18 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH, RFC 5/8] ARM: OMAP2+: am43: Kconfig Afzal Mohammed
2013-02-18 11:38 ` Afzal Mohammed
2013-02-18 11:38 ` Afzal Mohammed
2013-02-19 10:27 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-19 10:27 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-19 10:27 ` Santosh Shilimkar
[not found] ` <5123537B.8050709-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-19 10:56 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 10:56 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 10:56 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 11:01 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-19 11:01 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-19 11:01 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH, RFC 6/8] ARM: OMAP2+: am43: basic dt support Afzal Mohammed
2013-02-18 11:38 ` Afzal Mohammed
2013-02-18 11:38 ` Afzal Mohammed
2013-02-19 10:32 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-19 10:32 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-19 10:32 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-18 11:37 ` [PATCH, RFC 4/8] ARM: am33xx: ll debug config help Afzal Mohammed
2013-02-18 11:37 ` Afzal Mohammed
2013-02-18 11:37 ` Afzal Mohammed
2013-02-19 10:25 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-19 10:25 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-19 10:25 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-19 10:30 ` Mohammed, Afzal
2013-02-19 10:30 ` Mohammed, Afzal
2013-02-19 10:30 ` Mohammed, Afzal
2013-02-19 11:02 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-19 11:02 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH, RFC 7/8] ARM: dts: am4372: initial support Afzal Mohammed
2013-02-18 11:38 ` Afzal Mohammed
2013-02-18 11:38 ` Afzal Mohammed
2013-02-18 18:22 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-18 18:22 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-18 18:22 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 9:10 ` Mohammed, Afzal
2013-02-19 9:10 ` Mohammed, Afzal
2013-02-19 9:10 ` Mohammed, Afzal
[not found] ` <C8443D0743D26F4388EA172BF4E2A7A93EAA85B2-Er742YJ7I/eIQmiDNMet8wC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-19 9:17 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 9:17 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 9:17 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-18 11:38 ` [PATCH, RFC 8/8] ARM: dts: am43-pre-silicon support Afzal Mohammed
2013-02-18 11:38 ` Afzal Mohammed
2013-02-18 11:38 ` Afzal Mohammed
2013-02-19 10:35 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-19 10:35 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-19 10:35 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-19 10:52 ` Mohammed, Afzal
2013-02-19 10:52 ` Mohammed, Afzal
2013-02-19 10:52 ` Mohammed, Afzal
[not found] ` <C8443D0743D26F4388EA172BF4E2A7A93EAA86DE-Er742YJ7I/eIQmiDNMet8wC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-19 11:00 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-19 11:00 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-19 11:00 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-19 11:03 ` Mohammed, Afzal
2013-02-19 11:03 ` Mohammed, Afzal
2013-02-19 11:03 ` Mohammed, Afzal
2013-02-19 11:11 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-19 11:11 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-19 10:09 ` [PATCH, RFC 0/8] ARM: AM43 (OMAP2+) boot support Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-19 10:09 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-19 10:09 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-19 11:24 ` Mohammed, Afzal
2013-02-19 11:24 ` Mohammed, Afzal
2013-02-19 11:24 ` Mohammed, Afzal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5123524A.9080300@ti.com \
--to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=afzal@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=khasim@ti.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=nico@linaro.org \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.