All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
To: Matt Fleming <matt-HNK1S37rvNbeXh+fF434Mdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Matt Fleming
	<matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, efi: Make "noefi" really disable EFI runtime serivces
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 08:46:10 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51256042.5030704@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1361392572-25657-1-git-send-email-matt-HNK1S37rvNbeXh+fF434Mdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>

Hi Matt,

(2013/02/21 5:36), Matt Fleming wrote:
> From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> 
> commit 1de63d60cd5b ("efi: Clear EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES rather than
> EFI_BOOT by "noefi" boot parameter") attempted to make "noefi" true to
> its documentation and disable EFI runtime services to prevent the
> bricking bug described in commit e0094244e41c ("samsung-laptop:
> Disable on EFI hardware"). However, it's not possible to clear
> EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES from an early param function because
> EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES is set in efi_init() *after* parse_early_param().
> 
> This resulted in "noefi" effectively becoming a no-op and no longer
> providing users with a way to disable EFI, which is bad for those
> users that have buggy machines.

Sorry, my patch was imperfect. This patch looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>

Thanks,
Satoru

> 
> Reported-by: Walt Nelson Jr <walt0924-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: <stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
> index 928bf83..e2cd38f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
> @@ -85,9 +85,10 @@ int efi_enabled(int facility)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(efi_enabled);
>  
> +static bool disable_runtime = false;
>  static int __init setup_noefi(char *arg)
>  {
> -	clear_bit(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES, &x86_efi_facility);
> +	disable_runtime = true;
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  early_param("noefi", setup_noefi);
> @@ -734,7 +735,7 @@ void __init efi_init(void)
>  	if (!efi_is_native())
>  		pr_info("No EFI runtime due to 32/64-bit mismatch with kernel\n");
>  	else {
> -		if (efi_runtime_init())
> +		if (disable_runtime || efi_runtime_init())
>  			return;
>  		set_bit(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES, &x86_efi_facility);
>  	}
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, efi: Make "noefi" really disable EFI runtime serivces
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 08:46:10 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51256042.5030704@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1361392572-25657-1-git-send-email-matt@console-pimps.org>

Hi Matt,

(2013/02/21 5:36), Matt Fleming wrote:
> From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
> 
> commit 1de63d60cd5b ("efi: Clear EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES rather than
> EFI_BOOT by "noefi" boot parameter") attempted to make "noefi" true to
> its documentation and disable EFI runtime services to prevent the
> bricking bug described in commit e0094244e41c ("samsung-laptop:
> Disable on EFI hardware"). However, it's not possible to clear
> EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES from an early param function because
> EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES is set in efi_init() *after* parse_early_param().
> 
> This resulted in "noefi" effectively becoming a no-op and no longer
> providing users with a way to disable EFI, which is bad for those
> users that have buggy machines.

Sorry, my patch was imperfect. This patch looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>

Thanks,
Satoru

> 
> Reported-by: Walt Nelson Jr <walt0924@gmail.com>
> Cc: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
> index 928bf83..e2cd38f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
> @@ -85,9 +85,10 @@ int efi_enabled(int facility)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(efi_enabled);
>  
> +static bool disable_runtime = false;
>  static int __init setup_noefi(char *arg)
>  {
> -	clear_bit(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES, &x86_efi_facility);
> +	disable_runtime = true;
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  early_param("noefi", setup_noefi);
> @@ -734,7 +735,7 @@ void __init efi_init(void)
>  	if (!efi_is_native())
>  		pr_info("No EFI runtime due to 32/64-bit mismatch with kernel\n");
>  	else {
> -		if (efi_runtime_init())
> +		if (disable_runtime || efi_runtime_init())
>  			return;
>  		set_bit(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES, &x86_efi_facility);
>  	}
> 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-02-20 23:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-20 20:36 [PATCH] x86, efi: Make "noefi" really disable EFI runtime serivces Matt Fleming
2013-02-20 20:36 ` Matt Fleming
2013-02-20 23:25 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Matt Fleming
2013-02-21  0:16   ` Yinghai Lu
2013-02-21 10:33     ` Matt Fleming
2013-02-21 17:02       ` H. Peter Anvin
     [not found] ` <1361392572-25657-1-git-send-email-matt-HNK1S37rvNbeXh+fF434Mdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-20 23:46   ` Satoru Takeuchi [this message]
2013-02-20 23:46     ` [PATCH] " Satoru Takeuchi
2013-02-20 23:50     ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51256042.5030704@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=takeuchi_satoru-+cum20s59erqfuhtdcdx3a@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=hpa-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=matt-HNK1S37rvNbeXh+fF434Mdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.