From: Marcus Sundman <marcus@hibox.fi>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Debugging system freezes on filesystem writes
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 20:41:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <512D01E0.7010009@hibox.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130224012052.GC1196@thunk.org>
On 24.02.2013 03:20, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:12:22AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
>>>> /dev/sda6 /home ext4 rw,noatime,discard 0 0
>> ^^^^^^^
>> I'd say that's your problem....
> Looks like the Sandisk U100 is a good SSD for me to put on my personal
> "avoid" list:
>
> http://thessdreview.com/our-reviews/asus-zenbook-ssd-review-not-necessarily-sandforce-driven-shows-significant-speed-bump/
>
> There are a number of SSD's which do not implement "trim" efficiently,
> so these days, the recommended way to use trim is to run the "fstrim"
> command out of crontab.
OK. Removing 'discard' made it much better (the 60-600 second freezes
are now 1-50 second freezes), but it's still at least an order of
magnitude worse than a normal HD. When writing, that is -- reading is
very fast (when there's no writing going on).
So, after reading up a bit on this trimming I'm thinking maybe my
filesystem's block sizes don't match up with my SSD's blocks (or
whatever its write unit is called). Then writing a FS block would always
write to multiple SSD blocks, causing multiple read-erase-write
sequences, right? So how can I check this, and how can I make the FS
blocks match the SSD blocks?
Best regards,
Marcus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-26 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-28 22:39 Debugging system freezes on filesystem writes Marcus Sundman
2012-11-01 19:01 ` Jan Kara
2012-11-02 2:19 ` Marcus Sundman
2012-11-07 16:17 ` Jan Kara
2012-11-08 23:41 ` Marcus Sundman
2012-11-09 13:12 ` Marcus Sundman
2012-11-13 13:51 ` Jan Kara
2012-11-16 1:11 ` Marcus Sundman
2012-11-21 23:30 ` Jan Kara
2012-11-27 16:14 ` Marcus Sundman
2012-12-05 15:32 ` Jan Kara
2013-02-20 8:42 ` Marcus Sundman
2013-02-20 11:40 ` Marcus Sundman
2013-02-22 20:51 ` Jan Kara
2013-02-22 23:27 ` Marcus Sundman
2013-02-24 0:12 ` Dave Chinner
2013-02-24 1:20 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-26 18:41 ` Marcus Sundman [this message]
2013-02-26 22:17 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-26 23:17 ` Jan Kara
2013-09-12 12:57 ` Marcus Sundman
2013-09-12 13:10 ` Jan Kara
2013-09-12 13:47 ` Marcus Sundman
2013-09-12 14:39 ` Jan Kara
2013-09-12 15:08 ` Marcus Sundman
2013-09-12 16:35 ` Jan Kara
2013-09-12 17:59 ` Marcus Sundman
2013-09-12 20:46 ` Jan Kara
2013-09-13 6:35 ` Marcus Sundman
2013-09-13 20:54 ` Jan Kara
2013-09-14 2:41 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-15 19:19 ` Marcus Sundman
2013-09-16 0:06 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-25 13:05 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=512D01E0.7010009@hibox.fi \
--to=marcus@hibox.fi \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.