From: Marcus Sundman <marcus@hibox.fi>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Debugging system freezes on filesystem writes
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 15:57:32 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5231BA3C.2090704@hibox.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130226231703.GA22674@quack.suse.cz>
On 27.02.2013 01:17, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 26-02-13 20:41:36, Marcus Sundman wrote:
>> On 24.02.2013 03:20, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>>> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:12:22AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
>>>>>> /dev/sda6 /home ext4 rw,noatime,discard 0 0
>>>> ^^^^^^^
>>>> I'd say that's your problem....
>>> Looks like the Sandisk U100 is a good SSD for me to put on my personal
>>> "avoid" list:
>>>
>>> http://thessdreview.com/our-reviews/asus-zenbook-ssd-review-not-necessarily-sandforce-driven-shows-significant-speed-bump/
>>>
>>> There are a number of SSD's which do not implement "trim" efficiently,
>>> so these days, the recommended way to use trim is to run the "fstrim"
>>> command out of crontab.
>> OK. Removing 'discard' made it much better (the 60-600 second
>> freezes are now 1-50 second freezes), but it's still at least an
>> order of magnitude worse than a normal HD. When writing, that is --
>> reading is very fast (when there's no writing going on).
>>
>> So, after reading up a bit on this trimming I'm thinking maybe my
>> filesystem's block sizes don't match up with my SSD's blocks (or
>> whatever its write unit is called). Then writing a FS block would
>> always write to multiple SSD blocks, causing multiple
>> read-erase-write sequences, right? So how can I check this, and how
>> can I make the FS blocks match the SSD blocks?
> As Ted wrote, alignment isn't usually a problem with SSDs. And even if it
> was, it would be at most a factor 2 slow down and we don't seem to be at
> that fine grained level :)
>
> At this point you might try mounting the fs with nobarrier mount option (I
> know you tried that before but without discard the difference could be more
> visible), switching IO scheduler to CFQ (for crappy SSDs it actually isn't
> a bad choice), and we'll see how much we can squeeze out of your drive...
I repartitioned the drive and reinstalled ubuntu and after that it
gladly wrote over 100 MB/s to the SSD without any hangs. However, after
a couple of months I noticed it had degraded considerably, and it keeps
degrading. Now it's slowly becoming completely unusable again, with
write speeds of the magnitude 1 MB/s and dropping.
As far as I can tell I have not made any relevant changes. Also, the
amount of free space hasn't changed considerably, but it seems that the
longer it's been since I reformatted the drive the more free space is
required for it to perform well.
So, maybe the cause is fragmentation? I tried running e4defrag and then
fstrim, but it didn't really help (well, maybe a little bit, but after a
couple of days it was back in unusable-land). Also, "e4defrag -c" gives
a fragmenation score of less than 5, so...
Any ideas?
Best regards,
Marcus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-12 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-28 22:39 Debugging system freezes on filesystem writes Marcus Sundman
2012-11-01 19:01 ` Jan Kara
2012-11-02 2:19 ` Marcus Sundman
2012-11-07 16:17 ` Jan Kara
2012-11-08 23:41 ` Marcus Sundman
2012-11-09 13:12 ` Marcus Sundman
2012-11-13 13:51 ` Jan Kara
2012-11-16 1:11 ` Marcus Sundman
2012-11-21 23:30 ` Jan Kara
2012-11-27 16:14 ` Marcus Sundman
2012-12-05 15:32 ` Jan Kara
2013-02-20 8:42 ` Marcus Sundman
2013-02-20 11:40 ` Marcus Sundman
2013-02-22 20:51 ` Jan Kara
2013-02-22 23:27 ` Marcus Sundman
2013-02-24 0:12 ` Dave Chinner
2013-02-24 1:20 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-26 18:41 ` Marcus Sundman
2013-02-26 22:17 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-26 23:17 ` Jan Kara
2013-09-12 12:57 ` Marcus Sundman [this message]
2013-09-12 13:10 ` Jan Kara
2013-09-12 13:47 ` Marcus Sundman
2013-09-12 14:39 ` Jan Kara
2013-09-12 15:08 ` Marcus Sundman
2013-09-12 16:35 ` Jan Kara
2013-09-12 17:59 ` Marcus Sundman
2013-09-12 20:46 ` Jan Kara
2013-09-13 6:35 ` Marcus Sundman
2013-09-13 20:54 ` Jan Kara
2013-09-14 2:41 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-09-15 19:19 ` Marcus Sundman
2013-09-16 0:06 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-25 13:05 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5231BA3C.2090704@hibox.fi \
--to=marcus@hibox.fi \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.