From: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
To: "Philip, Avinash" <avinashphilip@ti.com>
Cc: device-tree <devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Add function for configuring GPMC settings
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 09:43:37 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5130CCA9.10905@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <518397C60809E147AF5323E0420B992E3EA90C2F@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
On 02/28/2013 11:33 PM, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 22:42:37, Hunter, Jon wrote:
>>
>> On 02/28/2013 09:52 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/28/2013 12:05 AM, Philip, Avinash wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 23:00:31, Hunter, Jon wrote:
>>>>> The GPMC has various different configuration options such as bus-width,
>>>>> synchronous or asychronous mode selection, burst mode options etc.
>>>>> Currently, there is no common function for configuring these options and
>>>>> various devices set these options by either programming the GPMC CONFIG1
>>>>> register directly or by calling gpmc_cs_configure() to set some of the
>>>>> options.
>>>>>
>>>>> Add a new function for configuring all of the GPMC options. Having a common
>>>>> function for configuring this options will simplify code and ease the
>>>>> migration to device-tree.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.h | 6 ++++
>>>>> 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
>>>>> index 465cac9..fb8dfd2 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
>>>>> @@ -1137,6 +1137,71 @@ int gpmc_calc_timings(struct gpmc_timings *gpmc_t,
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> +int gpmc_cs_program_settings(int cs, struct gpmc_settings *p)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + u32 config1;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if ((!p->device_width) || (p->device_width > GPMC_DEVWIDTH_16BIT)) {
>>>>> + pr_err("%s: invalid width %d!", __func__, p->device_width);
>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* Address-data multiplexing not supported for NAND devices */
>>>>> + if (p->device_nand && p->mux_add_data) {
>>>>> + pr_err("%s: invalid configuration!\n", __func__);
>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* Page/burst mode supports lengths of 4, 8 and 16 bytes */
>>>>> + if (p->burst_read || p->burst_write) {
>>>>> + switch (p->burst_len) {
>>>>> + case GPMC_BURST_4:
>>>>> + case GPMC_BURST_8:
>>>>> + case GPMC_BURST_16:
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> + default:
>>>>> + pr_err("%s: invalid page/burst-length (%d)\n",
>>>>> + __func__, p->burst_len);
>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if ((p->wait_on_read || p->wait_on_write) &&
>>>>> + (p->wait_pin > gpmc_nr_waitpins)) {
>>>>> + pr_err("%s: invalid wait-pin (%d)\n", __func__, p->wait_pin);
>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + config1 = GPMC_CONFIG1_DEVICESIZE((p->device_width - 1));
>>>>
>>>> Can you consider read_modify approach?
>>>
>>> I was purposely trying to avoid that. The intent here is to program all
>>> the settings and get away from any boot-loader dependencies. If we use a
>>> read-modify approach then it will never be clear in the kernel what
>>> should actually be programmed.
>>
>> By the way, it would be good to know what your motivation for this is.
>>
>> My goal is for all gpmc settings to eventually live in the DT blob and
>> there be no dependency on the bootloader whatsoever. That may mean that
>> settings are re-programmed again by the kernel but IMO that is best.
>
> Yes I understood now and the right thing to do.
> Suggested read modify approach because of some confusion as GPMC_CONFIG1 is already
> modified in gpmc_cs_set_timings() and is called from omap2_nand_gpmc_retime().
> So the data modified in gpmc_cs_set_timings() will lost (not significant)
> May be better and cleaner solution is to remove GPMC_CONFIG1 modification in
> gpmc_cs_set_timings() also.
Actually that is a good point. There are some timings in CONFIG1 that
are not being configured in gpmc_cs_program_settings() but
gpmc_cs_set_timings(). I had left it this way intentionally to keep
timings together, which makes sense for where gpmc clock could change at
run time. However, this means that gpmc_cs_program_settings() needs to
be called before gpmc_cs_set_timings(). Really this is no different to
how the code was before, because the code was writing directly to
CONFIG1 and now we have a function.
So the intent is for gpmc_cs_program_settings() to only be called once
for a given device and then gpmc_cs_set_timings() be called whenever the
timings need to be updated. May be I can updated the kernel-doc for
gpmc_cs_program_settings() to reflect this. Let me know if you have any
other concerns with this.
Cheers
Jon
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jon-hunter@ti.com (Jon Hunter)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 04/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Add function for configuring GPMC settings
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 09:43:37 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5130CCA9.10905@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <518397C60809E147AF5323E0420B992E3EA90C2F@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
On 02/28/2013 11:33 PM, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 22:42:37, Hunter, Jon wrote:
>>
>> On 02/28/2013 09:52 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/28/2013 12:05 AM, Philip, Avinash wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 23:00:31, Hunter, Jon wrote:
>>>>> The GPMC has various different configuration options such as bus-width,
>>>>> synchronous or asychronous mode selection, burst mode options etc.
>>>>> Currently, there is no common function for configuring these options and
>>>>> various devices set these options by either programming the GPMC CONFIG1
>>>>> register directly or by calling gpmc_cs_configure() to set some of the
>>>>> options.
>>>>>
>>>>> Add a new function for configuring all of the GPMC options. Having a common
>>>>> function for configuring this options will simplify code and ease the
>>>>> migration to device-tree.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.h | 6 ++++
>>>>> 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
>>>>> index 465cac9..fb8dfd2 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
>>>>> @@ -1137,6 +1137,71 @@ int gpmc_calc_timings(struct gpmc_timings *gpmc_t,
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> +int gpmc_cs_program_settings(int cs, struct gpmc_settings *p)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + u32 config1;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if ((!p->device_width) || (p->device_width > GPMC_DEVWIDTH_16BIT)) {
>>>>> + pr_err("%s: invalid width %d!", __func__, p->device_width);
>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* Address-data multiplexing not supported for NAND devices */
>>>>> + if (p->device_nand && p->mux_add_data) {
>>>>> + pr_err("%s: invalid configuration!\n", __func__);
>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* Page/burst mode supports lengths of 4, 8 and 16 bytes */
>>>>> + if (p->burst_read || p->burst_write) {
>>>>> + switch (p->burst_len) {
>>>>> + case GPMC_BURST_4:
>>>>> + case GPMC_BURST_8:
>>>>> + case GPMC_BURST_16:
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> + default:
>>>>> + pr_err("%s: invalid page/burst-length (%d)\n",
>>>>> + __func__, p->burst_len);
>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if ((p->wait_on_read || p->wait_on_write) &&
>>>>> + (p->wait_pin > gpmc_nr_waitpins)) {
>>>>> + pr_err("%s: invalid wait-pin (%d)\n", __func__, p->wait_pin);
>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + config1 = GPMC_CONFIG1_DEVICESIZE((p->device_width - 1));
>>>>
>>>> Can you consider read_modify approach?
>>>
>>> I was purposely trying to avoid that. The intent here is to program all
>>> the settings and get away from any boot-loader dependencies. If we use a
>>> read-modify approach then it will never be clear in the kernel what
>>> should actually be programmed.
>>
>> By the way, it would be good to know what your motivation for this is.
>>
>> My goal is for all gpmc settings to eventually live in the DT blob and
>> there be no dependency on the bootloader whatsoever. That may mean that
>> settings are re-programmed again by the kernel but IMO that is best.
>
> Yes I understood now and the right thing to do.
> Suggested read modify approach because of some confusion as GPMC_CONFIG1 is already
> modified in gpmc_cs_set_timings() and is called from omap2_nand_gpmc_retime().
> So the data modified in gpmc_cs_set_timings() will lost (not significant)
> May be better and cleaner solution is to remove GPMC_CONFIG1 modification in
> gpmc_cs_set_timings() also.
Actually that is a good point. There are some timings in CONFIG1 that
are not being configured in gpmc_cs_program_settings() but
gpmc_cs_set_timings(). I had left it this way intentionally to keep
timings together, which makes sense for where gpmc clock could change at
run time. However, this means that gpmc_cs_program_settings() needs to
be called before gpmc_cs_set_timings(). Really this is no different to
how the code was before, because the code was writing directly to
CONFIG1 and now we have a function.
So the intent is for gpmc_cs_program_settings() to only be called once
for a given device and then gpmc_cs_set_timings() be called whenever the
timings need to be updated. May be I can updated the kernel-doc for
gpmc_cs_program_settings() to reflect this. Let me know if you have any
other concerns with this.
Cheers
Jon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-01 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-26 17:30 [PATCH 00/14] ARM: OMAP2+: GPMC clean-up and DT update Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` [PATCH 01/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Simplify code configuring ONENAND devices Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` [PATCH 02/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Add variable to store number of GPMC waitpins Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` [PATCH 03/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Add structure for storing GPMC settings Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` [PATCH 04/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Add function for configuring " Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` Jon Hunter
2013-02-28 6:05 ` Philip, Avinash
2013-02-28 6:05 ` Philip, Avinash
[not found] ` <518397C60809E147AF5323E0420B992E3EA8F007-Er742YJ7I/eIQmiDNMet8wC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-28 15:52 ` Jon Hunter
2013-02-28 15:52 ` Jon Hunter
2013-02-28 17:12 ` Jon Hunter
2013-02-28 17:12 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-01 5:33 ` Philip, Avinash
2013-03-01 5:33 ` Philip, Avinash
2013-03-01 15:43 ` Jon Hunter [this message]
2013-03-01 15:43 ` Jon Hunter
[not found] ` <5130CCA9.10905-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-04 10:05 ` Philip, Avinash
2013-03-04 10:05 ` Philip, Avinash
2013-02-26 17:30 ` [PATCH 05/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Convert ONENAND to use gpmc_cs_program_settings() Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` [PATCH 06/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Convert NAND " Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` Jon Hunter
[not found] ` <1361899842-30303-7-git-send-email-jon-hunter-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-28 10:38 ` Philip, Avinash
2013-02-28 10:38 ` Philip, Avinash
2013-02-28 16:02 ` Jon Hunter
2013-02-28 16:02 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-01 5:40 ` Philip, Avinash
2013-03-01 5:40 ` Philip, Avinash
[not found] ` <518397C60809E147AF5323E0420B992E3EA90C46-Er742YJ7I/eIQmiDNMet8wC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-01 15:50 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-01 15:50 ` Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` [PATCH 07/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Convert SMC91x " Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` [PATCH 08/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Convert TUSB " Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` [PATCH 09/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Don't configure of chip-select options in gpmc_cs_configure() Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` [PATCH 10/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Add function to read GPMC settings from device-tree Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` [PATCH 11/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Add device-tree support for NOR flash Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-01 21:25 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-01 21:25 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-01 22:24 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-01 22:24 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-04 11:57 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-04 11:57 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-04 17:51 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-04 17:51 ` Jon Hunter
[not found] ` <5134DF2A.4050209-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-04 18:19 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-04 18:19 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-05 14:34 ` Mark Jackson
2013-03-05 14:34 ` Mark Jackson
2013-03-05 14:46 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-05 14:46 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-05 16:20 ` Mark Jackson
2013-03-05 16:20 ` Mark Jackson
2013-03-05 17:30 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-05 17:30 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-05 17:43 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-05 17:43 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-05 18:41 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-05 18:41 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-05 21:34 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-05 21:34 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-06 10:23 ` Mark Jackson
2013-03-06 10:23 ` Mark Jackson
2013-03-06 13:30 ` Mark Jackson
2013-03-06 13:30 ` Mark Jackson
2013-03-06 16:44 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-06 16:44 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-06 16:48 ` Mark Jackson
2013-03-06 16:48 ` Mark Jackson
2013-03-06 17:00 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-06 17:00 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-06 18:01 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-06 18:01 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-06 11:58 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-06 11:58 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-06 16:46 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-06 16:46 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-06 16:54 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-06 16:54 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-07 13:02 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-07 13:02 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-02-26 17:30 ` [PATCH 12/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Add additional GPMC timing parameters Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` Jon Hunter
[not found] ` <1361899842-30303-13-git-send-email-jon-hunter-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-01 20:11 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-01 20:11 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-01 20:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-01 20:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-01 22:27 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-01 22:27 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-01 22:27 ` Jon Hunter
2013-03-01 22:27 ` Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` [PATCH 13/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Convert NAND to retrieve GPMC settings from DT Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` [PATCH 14/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Convert ONENAND " Jon Hunter
2013-02-26 17:30 ` Jon Hunter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5130CCA9.10905@ti.com \
--to=jon-hunter@ti.com \
--cc=avinashphilip@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.