From: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@linux.intel.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@linux.jf.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Dave Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, HPA <hpa@zytor.com>,
Eliezer Tamir <eliezer@tamir.org.il>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] net: low latency Ethernet device polling
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 10:46:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51345F77.6060503@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5134592E.6050508@linux.intel.com>
>>>
>>
>>
>> A dumb question: is bypassing tcpdump/netfilters/qdisc etc. what we
>> always want? Isn't this a security issue?
>
> We are not bypassing any of the regular stack checks/hooks, we call the
> normal netif_rx_skb().
correction, netif_receive_skb()
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-04 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-27 17:55 [RFC PATCH 0/5] net: low latency Ethernet device polling Eliezer Tamir
2013-02-27 17:55 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] net: implement support for low latency socket polling Eliezer Tamir
2013-03-03 18:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-03 19:21 ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-03 21:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-04 3:55 ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-04 8:43 ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-03-04 14:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-04 15:28 ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-03-04 16:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-04 7:23 ` Cong Wang
2013-03-05 16:43 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-03-05 16:43 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-03-05 17:15 ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-03-05 19:57 ` David Miller
2013-03-05 19:55 ` David Miller
2013-03-05 20:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-03-05 20:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-27 17:56 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] tcp: add TCP support for low latency receive poll Eliezer Tamir
2013-03-05 17:13 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-03-05 17:13 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-02-27 17:56 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] ixgbe: Add support for ndo_ll_poll Eliezer Tamir
2013-02-27 18:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-02-27 19:20 ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-03-05 17:26 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-03-05 17:26 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-03-05 17:28 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-03-05 17:28 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-03-05 17:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-05 17:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-02-27 17:56 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] ixgbe: add extra stats " Eliezer Tamir
2013-02-27 17:56 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] ixgbe: kprobes latency test module Eliezer Tamir
2013-02-27 18:07 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] net: low latency Ethernet device polling Eliezer Tamir
2013-02-27 18:07 ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-02-27 18:13 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-02-27 18:47 ` Tom Herbert
2013-02-27 19:17 ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-03-04 22:34 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-02-27 19:58 ` Rick Jones
2013-02-27 20:40 ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-02-27 21:42 ` Ben Greear
2013-02-28 8:38 ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-03-01 21:24 ` David Miller
2013-03-01 22:57 ` Tom Herbert
2013-03-02 17:02 ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-03-04 7:37 ` Cong Wang
2013-03-04 7:37 ` Cong Wang
2013-03-04 8:19 ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-03-04 8:46 ` Eliezer Tamir [this message]
2013-03-04 17:19 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51345F77.6060503@linux.intel.com \
--to=eliezer.tamir@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=eliezer.tamir@linux.jf.intel.com \
--cc=eliezer@tamir.org.il \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.