Re: [PATCH] credit1: Use atomic bit operations for the flags structure

[George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>]

On 04/03/13 11:42, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 04.03.13 at 12:06, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
>> Ping?
> I could ack it, but wouldn't be permitted to commit without Keir's ack,
> so it's all left to him... Same for the two credit2 patches of yours (I
> reckon the resend today doesn't really have any changes over what
> you had sent last week).

Is that how it works?  I thought the main point was just that everything 
has to have a suitable ack, and not even committers can ack their own 
stuff; so my SoB + your ack should be sufficient. That seems to be how 
IanC and IanJ do stuff.

You are correct regarding the credit2 patches -- I resent them because 
the first batch I sent last week had a mistake, and I wasn't sure the 
second batch (with the fix) was distinguishable if someone got a bit 
confused.  So I thought it safest to send another copy explicitly with "v3".

  -George