* rebase --merge question
@ 2013-03-09 15:15 Stijn Souffriau
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Stijn Souffriau @ 2013-03-09 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
Hi all,
From help rebase:
--merge
Use merging strategies to rebase. When the recursive (default) merge
strategy is used, this allows rebase to be aware of renames on the
upstream side.
Renames of what? Files I assume. Are there any disadvantages compared to
the normal rebase? If not, why isn't --merge the default behaviour.
Thanks,
Stijn
--
Stijn Souffriau
Embedded Software Developer - Mind Embedded Software Division
ESSENSIUM nv
Mind - Embedded Software Division
Gaston Geenslaan 9 - B-3001 Leuven
email : stijn.souffriau@essensium.com
Web: www.essensium.com / www.mind.be
BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2013-03-09 15:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-03-09 15:15 rebase --merge question Stijn Souffriau
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.