All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xu Zhang <xzhang@cs.uic.edu>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com,
	gm281@cam.ac.uk, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] mini-os/x86-64 entry: check against nested events and try to fix up
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 21:53:19 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5140144F.6020102@cs.uic.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <513FE798.7040409@uic.edu>

On 3/12/2013 6:42 PM, Xu Zhang wrote:
> Basically both approaches are correct to me and do the same job. 
> Xen-Linux 32bit is definitely a more neat solution. However, one thing 
> to notice is that mini-os x86 32bit also uses a fixup table. I guess 
> we could apply these patches as a temporary solution to make sure 
> everything is correct and consistent, and having following patches to 
> do the refinement.
Ah, somewhat "consistent". :-) And by refinement I mean refinement on 
both 32bit and 64bit mini-os x86 kernel entries: basically replacing use 
of look up table with Xen-Linux x86-32bit's approach.

Thanks,

- Xu

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-13  5:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-08 21:30 [PATCH 0/6] mini-os: check and fix up against nested events in x86-64 kernel entry Xu Zhang
2013-03-08 21:30 ` [PATCH 1/6] mini-os/x86-64 entry: code clean-ups Xu Zhang
2013-03-09 20:57   ` Samuel Thibault
2013-03-08 21:30 ` [PATCH 2/6] mini-os/x86-64 entry: define macros for registers partial save and restore Xu Zhang
2013-03-09 20:55   ` Samuel Thibault
2013-03-08 21:30 ` [PATCH 3/6] mini-os/x86-64 entry: code refactoring; no functional changes Xu Zhang
2013-03-09 21:03   ` Samuel Thibault
2013-04-11  4:40     ` Xu Zhang
2013-03-08 21:30 ` [PATCH 4/6] mini-os/x86-64 entry: remove unnecessary event blocking Xu Zhang
2013-03-09 21:07   ` Samuel Thibault
2013-03-15 20:16   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-04-11  4:40     ` Xu Zhang
2013-03-08 21:30 ` [PATCH 5/6] mini-os/x86-64 entry: defer RESTORE_REST until return Xu Zhang
2013-03-09 21:15   ` Samuel Thibault
2013-03-08 21:30 ` [PATCH 6/6] mini-os/x86-64 entry: check against nested events and try to fix up Xu Zhang
2013-03-09 21:19   ` Samuel Thibault
2013-03-13  2:42     ` Xu Zhang
2013-03-09 22:44   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2013-03-13  2:42     ` Xu Zhang
2013-03-13  5:53       ` Xu Zhang [this message]
2013-03-14  1:09       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5140144F.6020102@cs.uic.edu \
    --to=xzhang@cs.uic.edu \
    --cc=gm281@cam.ac.uk \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.