All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
Cc: xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>, linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: enable test 032 (mkfs overwrite) for btrfs
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:12:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5143568F.5060900@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51435555.2020706@sgi.com>

On 3/15/13 12:07 PM, Rich Johnston wrote:
> Eric,
> 
> Thanks once more for the patch.  Once I finally got the correct version of mkfs.btrfs this looks good.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
> 
> Interesting that the default make install of btrfs-progs did not install over my btrfsprogs rpm.
> 
> Was running SLES11 SP2 with btrfsprogs-0.19-5.31.1.x86_64.
> 
> It did not put mkfs.btrfs in /sbin.  This did however, validate all the error paths ;).

Heh ;)

Well, mixing & matching upstream installs from source w/ rpm-packaged binaries is usually asking for trouble.

I don't think it's a bug, just bad administrative practice ;)

-Eric

> --Rich
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 03/13/2013 11:01 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> Now that btrfs has an "-f" arg, we can test that it doesn't
>> improperly overwrite other filesystems in 032 like we do
>> for xfs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>
>> diff --git a/032 b/032
>> index bf88492..89fb225 100755
>> --- a/032
>> +++ b/032
>> @@ -38,12 +38,18 @@ rm -f $seq.full
>>   . ./common.filter
>>
>>   # real QA test starts here
>> -_supported_fs xfs
>> +_supported_fs xfs btrfs
>>   _supported_os Linux
>>
>>   _require_nobigloopfs
>>   _require_scratch
>>
>> +# mkfs.btrfs did not have overwrite detection at first
>> +if [ "$FSTYP" == "btrfs" ]; then
>> +    grep -q 'force overwrite' `echo $MKFS_BTRFS_PROG | awk '{print $1}'` || \
>> +        _notrun "Installed mkfs.btrfs does not support -f option"
>> +fi
>> +
>>   echo "Silence is golden."
>>   for fs in `echo ${MKFS_PROG}.* | sed -e 's/.sbin.mkfs.//g'`
>>   do
>> @@ -61,7 +67,7 @@ do
>>       [ $fs = gfs2 ] && preop="echo y |" && preargs="-p lock_nolock -j 1"
>>       [ $fs = reiserfs ] && preop="echo y |" && preargs="-f"
>>       # cramfs mkfs requires a directory argument
>> -    [ $fs = cramfs ] && preargs=/proc/fs/xfs
>> +    [ $fs = cramfs ] && preargs=/proc/fs
>>       [ $fs = ext2 ] && preargs="-F"
>>       [ $fs = ext3 ] && preargs="-F"
>>       [ $fs = ext4 ] && preargs="-F"
>> @@ -77,8 +83,8 @@ do
>>
>>       if [ $? -eq 0 ] ; then
>>           # next, ensure we don't overwrite it
>> -        echo "=== Attempting XFS overwrite of $fs..." >>$seq.full
>> -        ${MKFS_PROG}.xfs $SCRATCH_DEV >>$seq.full 2>&1
>> +        echo "=== Attempting $FSTYP overwrite of $fs..." >>$seq.full
>> +        ${MKFS_PROG}.$FSTYP $SCRATCH_DEV >>$seq.full 2>&1
>>
>>           [ $? -eq 0 ] && echo "Failed - overwrote fs type ${fs}!"
>>       else
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> xfs mailing list
>> xfs@oss.sgi.com
>> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
>>
> 
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>, xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: enable test 032 (mkfs overwrite) for btrfs
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:12:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5143568F.5060900@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51435555.2020706@sgi.com>

On 3/15/13 12:07 PM, Rich Johnston wrote:
> Eric,
> 
> Thanks once more for the patch.  Once I finally got the correct version of mkfs.btrfs this looks good.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
> 
> Interesting that the default make install of btrfs-progs did not install over my btrfsprogs rpm.
> 
> Was running SLES11 SP2 with btrfsprogs-0.19-5.31.1.x86_64.
> 
> It did not put mkfs.btrfs in /sbin.  This did however, validate all the error paths ;).

Heh ;)

Well, mixing & matching upstream installs from source w/ rpm-packaged binaries is usually asking for trouble.

I don't think it's a bug, just bad administrative practice ;)

-Eric

> --Rich
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 03/13/2013 11:01 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> Now that btrfs has an "-f" arg, we can test that it doesn't
>> improperly overwrite other filesystems in 032 like we do
>> for xfs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>
>> diff --git a/032 b/032
>> index bf88492..89fb225 100755
>> --- a/032
>> +++ b/032
>> @@ -38,12 +38,18 @@ rm -f $seq.full
>>   . ./common.filter
>>
>>   # real QA test starts here
>> -_supported_fs xfs
>> +_supported_fs xfs btrfs
>>   _supported_os Linux
>>
>>   _require_nobigloopfs
>>   _require_scratch
>>
>> +# mkfs.btrfs did not have overwrite detection at first
>> +if [ "$FSTYP" == "btrfs" ]; then
>> +    grep -q 'force overwrite' `echo $MKFS_BTRFS_PROG | awk '{print $1}'` || \
>> +        _notrun "Installed mkfs.btrfs does not support -f option"
>> +fi
>> +
>>   echo "Silence is golden."
>>   for fs in `echo ${MKFS_PROG}.* | sed -e 's/.sbin.mkfs.//g'`
>>   do
>> @@ -61,7 +67,7 @@ do
>>       [ $fs = gfs2 ] && preop="echo y |" && preargs="-p lock_nolock -j 1"
>>       [ $fs = reiserfs ] && preop="echo y |" && preargs="-f"
>>       # cramfs mkfs requires a directory argument
>> -    [ $fs = cramfs ] && preargs=/proc/fs/xfs
>> +    [ $fs = cramfs ] && preargs=/proc/fs
>>       [ $fs = ext2 ] && preargs="-F"
>>       [ $fs = ext3 ] && preargs="-F"
>>       [ $fs = ext4 ] && preargs="-F"
>> @@ -77,8 +83,8 @@ do
>>
>>       if [ $? -eq 0 ] ; then
>>           # next, ensure we don't overwrite it
>> -        echo "=== Attempting XFS overwrite of $fs..." >>$seq.full
>> -        ${MKFS_PROG}.xfs $SCRATCH_DEV >>$seq.full 2>&1
>> +        echo "=== Attempting $FSTYP overwrite of $fs..." >>$seq.full
>> +        ${MKFS_PROG}.$FSTYP $SCRATCH_DEV >>$seq.full 2>&1
>>
>>           [ $? -eq 0 ] && echo "Failed - overwrote fs type ${fs}!"
>>       else
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> xfs mailing list
>> xfs@oss.sgi.com
>> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
>>
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-15 17:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-13 16:01 [PATCH] xfstests: enable test 032 (mkfs overwrite) for btrfs Eric Sandeen
2013-03-13 16:01 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-15 17:07 ` Rich Johnston
2013-03-15 17:07   ` Rich Johnston
2013-03-15 17:12   ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2013-03-15 17:12     ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-16 12:14     ` Linda Walsh
2013-03-16 12:14       ` Linda Walsh
2013-03-15 17:11 ` Rich Johnston
2013-03-15 17:11   ` Rich Johnston

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5143568F.5060900@redhat.com \
    --to=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjohnston@sgi.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.