From: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Count journal size in test 289
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:00:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5149DD16.7060006@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363776648-14061-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>
Thanks Jan for submitting this patch, it has been committed with Eric
suggestions.
Thanks
--Rich
commit 3574531af49bdde338aff0131100852e87e9d0fd
Author: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Date: Wed Mar 20 10:50:48 2013 +0000
xfstests: count journal size in test 289
Test 289 ignored the fact that historically journal is not accounted as
fs overhead in ext3. For larger filesystems it is hidden in 1%
tolerance
but for filesystems smaller than 12G the test fails. So make the
counting precise to work everywhere.
CC: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
[rjohnston@sgi.com: add lower case units to filter]
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
+ read size
diff --git a/289 b/289
index b057c20..eb5c63b 100755
--- a/289
+++ b/289
@@ -59,10 +59,18 @@ TOTAL_BLOCKS=`dumpe2fs -h $SCRATCH_DEV 2>/dev/null \
FREE_BLOCKS=`dumpe2fs -h $SCRATCH_DEV 2>/dev/null \
| awk '/Free blocks:/{print $3}'`
-# nb: kernels today don't count journal blocks as overhead, but should.
-# For most filesystems this will still be within tolerance.
-# Overhead is all the blocks (already) used by the fs itself:
-OVERHEAD=$(($TOTAL_BLOCKS-$FREE_BLOCKS))
+# ext3 doesn't count journal blocks as overhead, ext4 does.
+if [ $FSTYP = "ext3" ]; then
+ JOURNAL_SIZE=`dumpe2fs -h $SCRATCH_DEV 2>/dev/null \
+ | awk '/Journal size:/{print $3}' | _filter_size_to_bytes`
+ BLOCK_SIZE=`dumpe2fs -h $SCRATCH_DEV 2>/dev/null \
+ | awk '/Block size:/{print $3}'`
+ JOURNAL_BLOCKS=$(($JOURNAL_SIZE/$BLOCK_SIZE))
+else
+ JOURNAL_BLOCKS=0
+fi
+
+OVERHEAD=$(($TOTAL_BLOCKS-$FREE_BLOCKS-$JOURNAL_BLOCKS))
# bsddf|minixdf
# Set the behaviour for the statfs system call. The minixdf
diff --git a/common.filter b/common.filter
index da5675f..bdd6427 100644
--- a/common.filter
+++ b/common.filter
@@ -265,5 +265,20 @@ _filter_size()
sed -e "s/[0-9\.]\+\s\?[b|k|m|g|t][b]\?/<SIZE>/ig"
}
+# Convert string read from stdin like 128K to bytes and print it to stdout
+_filter_size_to_bytes()
+{
+ read size
+ suffix=${size:${#size}-1}
+ mul=1
+ case $suffix in
+ k|K) mul=1024 ;;
+ m|M) mul=$((1024*1024)) ;;
+ g|G) mul=$((1024*1024*1024)) ;;
+ t|T) mul=$((1024*1024*1024*1024)) ;;
+ esac
+ echo $((${size:0:${#size}-1}*$mul))
+}
+
# make sure this script returns success
/bin/true
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-20 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-20 10:50 [PATCH v2] Count journal size in test 289 Jan Kara
2013-03-20 14:31 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-20 14:37 ` Rich Johnston
2013-03-20 16:00 ` Rich Johnston [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5149DD16.7060006@sgi.com \
--to=rjohnston@sgi.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.