From: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, xfstests <xfs@oss.sgi.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] xfstests 276: use _require_no_large_scratch_dev instead of the removed _require_nobigloopfs
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:13:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <514AA503.4060101@gmail.com> (raw)
_require_nobigloopfs has been removed.
We should use _require_no_large_scratch_dev in the test script.
Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com>
---
276 | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/276 b/276
index 40b30cf..87363ca 100755
--- a/276
+++ b/276
@@ -58,8 +58,7 @@ _need_to_be_root
_supported_fs btrfs
_supported_os Linux
_require_scratch
-
-_require_nobigloopfs
+_require_no_large_scratch_dev
_require_btrfs inspect-internal
_require_command "/usr/sbin/filefrag"
--
1.7.10.4
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, xfstests <xfs@oss.sgi.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] xfstests 276: use _require_no_large_scratch_dev instead of the removed _require_nobigloopfs
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:13:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <514AA503.4060101@gmail.com> (raw)
_require_nobigloopfs has been removed.
We should use _require_no_large_scratch_dev in the test script.
Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com>
---
276 | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/276 b/276
index 40b30cf..87363ca 100755
--- a/276
+++ b/276
@@ -58,8 +58,7 @@ _need_to_be_root
_supported_fs btrfs
_supported_os Linux
_require_scratch
-
-_require_nobigloopfs
+_require_no_large_scratch_dev
_require_btrfs inspect-internal
_require_command "/usr/sbin/filefrag"
--
1.7.10.4
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next reply other threads:[~2013-03-21 6:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-21 6:13 Wang Sheng-Hui [this message]
2013-03-21 6:13 ` [PATCH] xfstests 276: use _require_no_large_scratch_dev instead of the removed _require_nobigloopfs Wang Sheng-Hui
2013-03-25 4:35 ` Wang Sheng-Hui
2013-03-25 4:35 ` Wang Sheng-Hui
2013-03-25 9:19 ` Jan Schmidt
2013-03-25 13:43 ` Rich Johnston
2013-03-25 13:43 ` Rich Johnston
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=514AA503.4060101@gmail.com \
--to=shhuiw@gmail.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.