All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 02/14] ARM: OMAP2+: add omapdss_init_of()
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 09:28:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5152BBD3.9070202@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364373921-7599-3-git-send-email-tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>

Hi Tomi,

On 03/27/2013 09:45 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> omapdss driver uses a omapdss platform device to pass platform specific
> function pointers and DSS hardware version from the arch code to the
> driver. This device is needed also when booting with DT.
> 
> This patch adds omapdss_init_of() function, called from board-generic at
> init time, which creates the omapdss device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c |    1 +
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/common.h        |    2 ++
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c       |   34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c
> index a61544b..29eb085 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ static void __init omap_generic_init(void)
>  
>  	of_platform_populate(NULL, omap_dt_match_table, NULL, NULL);
>  
> +	omapdss_init_of();

Mmm, you should not have to call that explicitly. It looks like a hack
to me. Everything in theory should be initialized during
of_platform_populate / driver probe.

>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SOC_OMAP2420
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/common.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/common.h
> index 40f4a03..e9ac1fd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/common.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/common.h
> @@ -293,5 +293,7 @@ extern void omap_reserve(void);
>  struct omap_hwmod;
>  extern int omap_dss_reset(struct omap_hwmod *);
>  
> +int __init omapdss_init_of(void);
> +
>  #endif /* __ASSEMBLER__ */
>  #endif /* __ARCH_ARM_MACH_OMAP2PLUS_COMMON_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c
> index ff37be1..c62aee0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
>  #include <linux/clk.h>
>  #include <linux/err.h>
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
>  
>  #include <video/omapdss.h>
>  #include "omap_hwmod.h"
> @@ -564,3 +566,35 @@ int omap_dss_reset(struct omap_hwmod *oh)
>  
>  	return r;
>  }
> +
> +int __init omapdss_init_of(void)
> +{
> +	int r;
> +	enum omapdss_version ver;
> +
> +	static struct omap_dss_board_info board_data = {
> +		.dsi_enable_pads = omap_dsi_enable_pads,
> +		.dsi_disable_pads = omap_dsi_disable_pads,

Pads config should be handle by pinmux framework is possible. Otherwise
a dedicated driver will be required.

> +		.get_context_loss_count = omap_pm_get_dev_context_loss_count,
> +		.set_min_bus_tput = omap_dss_set_min_bus_tput,


All that code should disappear with DT. hacking a platform device with
pdata is the old way of initializing a device.

I know that you do have some omap_pm callback, but you'd better get rid
of them in case of DT boot.
Fixing that is a generic issue, and as soon as a solution will be done
to handle these specific hooks, every drivers will be able to use that.

> +	};
> +
> +	ver = omap_display_get_version();
> +
> +	if (ver = OMAPDSS_VER_UNKNOWN) {
> +		pr_err("DSS not supported on this SoC\n");
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +	}
> +
> +	board_data.version = ver;
> +
> +	omap_display_device.dev.platform_data = &board_data;

Regards,
Benoit


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com>, Andy Gross <andy.gross@ti.com>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 02/14] ARM: OMAP2+: add omapdss_init_of()
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:28:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5152BBD3.9070202@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364373921-7599-3-git-send-email-tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>

Hi Tomi,

On 03/27/2013 09:45 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> omapdss driver uses a omapdss platform device to pass platform specific
> function pointers and DSS hardware version from the arch code to the
> driver. This device is needed also when booting with DT.
> 
> This patch adds omapdss_init_of() function, called from board-generic at
> init time, which creates the omapdss device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c |    1 +
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/common.h        |    2 ++
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c       |   34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c
> index a61544b..29eb085 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ static void __init omap_generic_init(void)
>  
>  	of_platform_populate(NULL, omap_dt_match_table, NULL, NULL);
>  
> +	omapdss_init_of();

Mmm, you should not have to call that explicitly. It looks like a hack
to me. Everything in theory should be initialized during
of_platform_populate / driver probe.

>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SOC_OMAP2420
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/common.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/common.h
> index 40f4a03..e9ac1fd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/common.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/common.h
> @@ -293,5 +293,7 @@ extern void omap_reserve(void);
>  struct omap_hwmod;
>  extern int omap_dss_reset(struct omap_hwmod *);
>  
> +int __init omapdss_init_of(void);
> +
>  #endif /* __ASSEMBLER__ */
>  #endif /* __ARCH_ARM_MACH_OMAP2PLUS_COMMON_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c
> index ff37be1..c62aee0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
>  #include <linux/clk.h>
>  #include <linux/err.h>
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
>  
>  #include <video/omapdss.h>
>  #include "omap_hwmod.h"
> @@ -564,3 +566,35 @@ int omap_dss_reset(struct omap_hwmod *oh)
>  
>  	return r;
>  }
> +
> +int __init omapdss_init_of(void)
> +{
> +	int r;
> +	enum omapdss_version ver;
> +
> +	static struct omap_dss_board_info board_data = {
> +		.dsi_enable_pads = omap_dsi_enable_pads,
> +		.dsi_disable_pads = omap_dsi_disable_pads,

Pads config should be handle by pinmux framework is possible. Otherwise
a dedicated driver will be required.

> +		.get_context_loss_count = omap_pm_get_dev_context_loss_count,
> +		.set_min_bus_tput = omap_dss_set_min_bus_tput,


All that code should disappear with DT. hacking a platform device with
pdata is the old way of initializing a device.

I know that you do have some omap_pm callback, but you'd better get rid
of them in case of DT boot.
Fixing that is a generic issue, and as soon as a solution will be done
to handle these specific hooks, every drivers will be able to use that.

> +	};
> +
> +	ver = omap_display_get_version();
> +
> +	if (ver == OMAPDSS_VER_UNKNOWN) {
> +		pr_err("DSS not supported on this SoC\n");
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +	}
> +
> +	board_data.version = ver;
> +
> +	omap_display_device.dev.platform_data = &board_data;

Regards,
Benoit


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: b-cousson@ti.com (Benoit Cousson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC 02/14] ARM: OMAP2+: add omapdss_init_of()
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:28:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5152BBD3.9070202@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364373921-7599-3-git-send-email-tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>

Hi Tomi,

On 03/27/2013 09:45 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> omapdss driver uses a omapdss platform device to pass platform specific
> function pointers and DSS hardware version from the arch code to the
> driver. This device is needed also when booting with DT.
> 
> This patch adds omapdss_init_of() function, called from board-generic at
> init time, which creates the omapdss device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c |    1 +
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/common.h        |    2 ++
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c       |   34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c
> index a61544b..29eb085 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ static void __init omap_generic_init(void)
>  
>  	of_platform_populate(NULL, omap_dt_match_table, NULL, NULL);
>  
> +	omapdss_init_of();

Mmm, you should not have to call that explicitly. It looks like a hack
to me. Everything in theory should be initialized during
of_platform_populate / driver probe.

>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SOC_OMAP2420
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/common.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/common.h
> index 40f4a03..e9ac1fd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/common.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/common.h
> @@ -293,5 +293,7 @@ extern void omap_reserve(void);
>  struct omap_hwmod;
>  extern int omap_dss_reset(struct omap_hwmod *);
>  
> +int __init omapdss_init_of(void);
> +
>  #endif /* __ASSEMBLER__ */
>  #endif /* __ARCH_ARM_MACH_OMAP2PLUS_COMMON_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c
> index ff37be1..c62aee0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
>  #include <linux/clk.h>
>  #include <linux/err.h>
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
>  
>  #include <video/omapdss.h>
>  #include "omap_hwmod.h"
> @@ -564,3 +566,35 @@ int omap_dss_reset(struct omap_hwmod *oh)
>  
>  	return r;
>  }
> +
> +int __init omapdss_init_of(void)
> +{
> +	int r;
> +	enum omapdss_version ver;
> +
> +	static struct omap_dss_board_info board_data = {
> +		.dsi_enable_pads = omap_dsi_enable_pads,
> +		.dsi_disable_pads = omap_dsi_disable_pads,

Pads config should be handle by pinmux framework is possible. Otherwise
a dedicated driver will be required.

> +		.get_context_loss_count = omap_pm_get_dev_context_loss_count,
> +		.set_min_bus_tput = omap_dss_set_min_bus_tput,


All that code should disappear with DT. hacking a platform device with
pdata is the old way of initializing a device.

I know that you do have some omap_pm callback, but you'd better get rid
of them in case of DT boot.
Fixing that is a generic issue, and as soon as a solution will be done
to handle these specific hooks, every drivers will be able to use that.

> +	};
> +
> +	ver = omap_display_get_version();
> +
> +	if (ver == OMAPDSS_VER_UNKNOWN) {
> +		pr_err("DSS not supported on this SoC\n");
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +	}
> +
> +	board_data.version = ver;
> +
> +	omap_display_device.dev.platform_data = &board_data;

Regards,
Benoit

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-27  9:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-27  8:45 [RFC 00/14] Add DT support to OMAPDSS Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27  8:45 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27  8:45 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27  8:45 ` [RFC 01/14] ARM: OMAP: remove DSS DT hack Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27  8:45   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27  8:45 ` [RFC 02/14] ARM: OMAP2+: add omapdss_init_of() Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27  8:45   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27  9:28   ` Benoit Cousson [this message]
2013-03-27  9:28     ` Benoit Cousson
2013-03-27  9:28     ` Benoit Cousson
2013-03-27 10:09     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27 10:09       ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27 10:09       ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27  8:45 ` [RFC 03/14] OMAPDSS: Add DT support to DSS, DISPC, DPI Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27  8:45   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27  8:45 ` [RFC 04/14] OMAPDSS: Add DT support to DSI Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27  8:45   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27  8:45 ` [RFC 05/14] OMAPDSS: Add DT support to HDMI Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27  8:45   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27  8:45 ` [RFC 06/14] OMAPDSS: Taal: Add DT support Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27  8:45   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27  8:45 ` [RFC 07/14] OMAPDSS: TFP410: " Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27  8:45   ` Tomi Valkeinen
     [not found] ` <1364373921-7599-1-git-send-email-tomi.valkeinen-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-27  8:45   ` [RFC 08/14] OMAPDSS: panel-generic-dpi: add " Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27  8:45     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27  8:45   ` [RFC 09/14] ARM: omap3.dtsi: add omapdss information Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27  8:45     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27  8:45   ` [RFC 10/14] ARM: omap4.dtsi: " Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27  8:45     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27  8:45   ` [RFC 13/14] ARM: omap3-tobi.dts: add lcd (TEST) Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27  8:45     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27  8:45   ` [RFC 14/14] ARM: omap3-beagle.dts: add TFP410 Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27  8:45     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27  8:45 ` [RFC 11/14] ARM: omap4-panda.dts: add display information Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27  8:45   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27  8:45 ` [RFC 12/14] ARM: omap4-sdp.dts: " Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27  8:45   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27  9:30 ` [RFC 00/14] Add DT support to OMAPDSS Benoit Cousson
2013-03-27  9:30   ` Benoit Cousson
2013-03-27  9:30   ` Benoit Cousson
2013-03-27 10:15   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27 10:15     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27 10:15     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27  9:41 ` Benoit Cousson
2013-03-27  9:41   ` Benoit Cousson
2013-03-27  9:41   ` Benoit Cousson
2013-03-27 10:39   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27 10:39     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-03-27 10:39     ` Tomi Valkeinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5152BBD3.9070202@ti.com \
    --to=b-cousson@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.