All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Robert Jennings <rcj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>,
	Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: zsmalloc zbud hybrid design discussion?
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 12:30:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5153C76E.3050203@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ef105888-1996-4c78-829a-36b84973ce65@default>


On 03/28/2013 04:04 AM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> Seth and all zproject folks --
> 
> I've been giving some deep thought as to how a zpage
> allocator might be designed that would incorporate the
> best of both zsmalloc and zbud.
> 
> Rather than dive into coding, it occurs to me that the
> best chance of success would be if all interested parties
> could first discuss (on-list) and converge on a design
> that we can all agree on.  If we achieve that, I don't
> care who writes the code and/or gets the credit or
> chooses the name.  If we can't achieve consensus, at
> least it will be much clearer where our differences lie.
> 
> Any thoughts?

Can't agree more!
Hoping we would agree on a design dealing well with
density/fragmentation/pageframe-reclaim and better integration with MM.
And then working together to implement it.

-- 
Regards,
-Bob

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Robert Jennings <rcj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>,
	Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: zsmalloc zbud hybrid design discussion?
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 12:30:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5153C76E.3050203@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ef105888-1996-4c78-829a-36b84973ce65@default>


On 03/28/2013 04:04 AM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> Seth and all zproject folks --
> 
> I've been giving some deep thought as to how a zpage
> allocator might be designed that would incorporate the
> best of both zsmalloc and zbud.
> 
> Rather than dive into coding, it occurs to me that the
> best chance of success would be if all interested parties
> could first discuss (on-list) and converge on a design
> that we can all agree on.  If we achieve that, I don't
> care who writes the code and/or gets the credit or
> chooses the name.  If we can't achieve consensus, at
> least it will be much clearer where our differences lie.
> 
> Any thoughts?

Can't agree more!
Hoping we would agree on a design dealing well with
density/fragmentation/pageframe-reclaim and better integration with MM.
And then working together to implement it.

-- 
Regards,
-Bob

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-28  4:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-27 20:04 zsmalloc zbud hybrid design discussion? Dan Magenheimer
2013-03-27 20:04 ` Dan Magenheimer
2013-03-28  4:30 ` Bob Liu [this message]
2013-03-28  4:30   ` Bob Liu
2013-04-11 19:35 ` Seth Jennings
2013-04-11 19:35   ` Seth Jennings
2013-04-11 20:10   ` Seth Jennings
2013-04-11 20:10     ` Seth Jennings
2013-04-11 23:28   ` Dan Magenheimer
2013-04-11 23:28     ` Dan Magenheimer
2013-04-12 20:15     ` Seth Jennings
2013-04-12 20:15       ` Seth Jennings
2013-04-12 20:48       ` Dan Magenheimer
2013-04-12 20:48         ` Dan Magenheimer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5153C76E.3050203@oracle.com \
    --to=bob.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
    --cc=rcj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.