From: Li Zefan <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] cpuacct, cgroup: Remove cgroup_subsys.active
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:20:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5153EF24.3040608@huawei.com> (raw)
cpuacct is the only user of cgroup_subsys.active flag.
The flag is needed because cpuacct_charge() and cpuacct_account_field() can
be called when cpuacct hasn't been initialized during system bootup.
This patch initializes cpuacct earlier, and the result is we don't have
to check the flag in scheduler hot path.
Note, this patchset is based on "[PATCH 0/7] sched: Split cpuacct"
(just because there're code conflicts)
http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/28/1
0001-cpuacct-allocate-per_cpu-cpuusage-for-root-cpuacct-s.patch
0002-cpuacct-Initialize-root-cpuacct-earlier.patch
0003-cpuacct-Initialize-cpuacct-subsystem-earlier.patch
0004-cpuacct-No-need-to-check-subsys-active-state.patch
0005-cgroup-Remove-subsys.active-flag.patch
--
include/linux/cgroup.h | 1 -
kernel/cgroup.c | 3 ---
kernel/sched/core.c | 2 --
kernel/sched/cpuacct.c | 30 +++++++++++-------------------
kernel/sched/cpuacct.h | 5 -----
5 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] cpuacct, cgroup: Remove cgroup_subsys.active
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:20:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5153EF24.3040608@huawei.com> (raw)
cpuacct is the only user of cgroup_subsys.active flag.
The flag is needed because cpuacct_charge() and cpuacct_account_field() can
be called when cpuacct hasn't been initialized during system bootup.
This patch initializes cpuacct earlier, and the result is we don't have
to check the flag in scheduler hot path.
Note, this patchset is based on "[PATCH 0/7] sched: Split cpuacct"
(just because there're code conflicts)
http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/28/1
0001-cpuacct-allocate-per_cpu-cpuusage-for-root-cpuacct-s.patch
0002-cpuacct-Initialize-root-cpuacct-earlier.patch
0003-cpuacct-Initialize-cpuacct-subsystem-earlier.patch
0004-cpuacct-No-need-to-check-subsys-active-state.patch
0005-cgroup-Remove-subsys.active-flag.patch
--
include/linux/cgroup.h | 1 -
kernel/cgroup.c | 3 ---
kernel/sched/core.c | 2 --
kernel/sched/cpuacct.c | 30 +++++++++++-------------------
kernel/sched/cpuacct.h | 5 -----
5 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2013-03-28 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-28 7:20 Li Zefan [this message]
2013-03-28 7:20 ` [PATCH 0/5] cpuacct, cgroup: Remove cgroup_subsys.active Li Zefan
2013-03-28 7:20 ` [PATCH 2/5] cpuacct: Initialize root cpuacct earlier Li Zefan
[not found] ` <5153EF24.3040608-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-28 7:20 ` [PATCH 1/5] cpuacct: Allocate per_cpu cpuusage for root cpuacct statically Li Zefan
2013-03-28 7:20 ` Li Zefan
2013-03-28 7:21 ` [PATCH 3/5] cpuacct: Initialize cpuacct subsystem earlier Li Zefan
2013-03-28 7:21 ` Li Zefan
2013-03-28 7:21 ` [PATCH 5/5] cgroup: Remove subsys.active flag Li Zefan
2013-03-28 7:21 ` Li Zefan
[not found] ` <5153EF8D.2080502-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-28 18:19 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 18:19 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 7:21 ` [PATCH 4/5] cpuacct: No need to check subsys active state Li Zefan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5153EF24.3040608@huawei.com \
--to=lizefan-hv44wf8li93qt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mingo-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.