All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
To: Christian Ruppert <christian.ruppert@abilis.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Pierrick Hascoet <pierrick.hascoet@abilis.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Add implicit barriers to irqsave/restore class of functions
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 18:59:36 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <515C2EC0.4090904@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364994622-14110-1-git-send-email-christian.ruppert@abilis.com>

Hi Christian,

On 04/03/2013 06:40 PM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> This patch adds implicit memory barriers to irqsave/restore functions of
> the ARC architecture port in line with what is done in other architectures.
>
> It seems to fix several seemingly unrelated issues in our platform but for
> the moment it is insufficiently tested (and might even be incomplete).
> Please comment.

I think this is not needed. Semantically we need barrier for spinlocks, not irq
save/restore - although spin locks are one of the primary users of irq
save/restore API.

So repeating what Thomas already said, the barrier already exists for
PREEMPT_COUNT, we need to make sure they are present for !PREEMPT_COUNT.

-Vineet

> Signed-off-by: Christian Ruppert <christian.ruppert@abilis.com>
> ---
>  arch/arc/include/asm/irqflags.h |    8 ++++----
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arc/include/asm/irqflags.h b/arch/arc/include/asm/irqflags.h
> index ccd8480..c8147d1 100644
> --- a/arch/arc/include/asm/irqflags.h
> +++ b/arch/arc/include/asm/irqflags.h
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ static inline long arch_local_irq_save(void)
>  	"	flag.nz %0		\n"
>  	: "=r"(temp), "=r"(flags)
>  	: "n"((STATUS_E1_MASK | STATUS_E2_MASK))
> -	: "cc");
> +	: "memory", "cc");
>  
>  	return flags;
>  }
> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static inline void arch_local_irq_restore(unsigned long flags)
>  	__asm__ __volatile__(
>  	"	flag %0			\n"
>  	:
> -	: "r"(flags));
> +	: "r"(flags) : "memory");
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static inline void arch_local_irq_disable(void)
>  	"	and %0, %0, %1		\n"
>  	"	flag %0			\n"
>  	: "=&r"(temp)
> -	: "n"(~(STATUS_E1_MASK | STATUS_E2_MASK)));
> +	: "n"(~(STATUS_E1_MASK | STATUS_E2_MASK)) : "memory");
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static inline long arch_local_save_flags(void)
>  
>  	__asm__ __volatile__(
>  	"	lr  %0, [status32]	\n"
> -	: "=&r"(temp));
> +	: "=&r"(temp) : : "memory");
>  
>  	return temp;
>  }


  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-03 13:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-29 10:33 [PATCH] timer: Fix possible issues with non serialized timer_pending( ) Vineet Gupta
2013-04-03  7:20 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-04-03  8:53 ` Christian Ruppert
2013-04-03 12:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-04-03 13:03   ` Christian Ruppert
2013-04-03 13:10     ` [RFC] Add implicit barriers to irqsave/restore class of functions Christian Ruppert
2013-04-03 13:29       ` Vineet Gupta [this message]
2013-04-04  8:26         ` Christian Ruppert
2013-04-04 16:13       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-05  4:27         ` Vineet Gupta
2013-04-03 14:11   ` [PATCH] [PATCH] Gaurantee spinlocks implicit barrier for !PREEMPT_COUNT Vineet Gupta
2013-04-04 15:28     ` Christian Ruppert
2013-04-05  4:36       ` Vineet Gupta
2013-04-06 13:34         ` Vineet Gupta
2013-04-06 16:13           ` Linus Torvalds
2013-04-06 18:01             ` Linus Torvalds
2013-04-06 19:54               ` Jacquiot, Aurelien
2013-04-06 19:54                 ` Jacquiot, Aurelien
2013-04-09 16:33               ` [PATCH] tile: comment assumption about __insn_mtspr for <asm/irqflags.h> Chris Metcalf
2013-04-09 16:33                 ` Chris Metcalf
2013-04-08  4:20             ` [PATCH] [PATCH] Gaurantee spinlocks implicit barrier for !PREEMPT_COUNT Vineet Gupta
2013-04-08  4:48               ` Linus Torvalds
2013-04-08 13:37                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-08 14:31                   ` Steven Rostedt
2013-04-08 14:50                     ` Linus Torvalds
2013-04-08 14:59                       ` Steven Rostedt
2013-04-08 15:07                         ` Linus Torvalds
2013-04-09 14:32                           ` Linus Torvalds
2013-04-10  7:12                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-08 14:05                 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-04-08  4:49               ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=515C2EC0.4090904@synopsys.com \
    --to=vineet.gupta1@synopsys.com \
    --cc=christian.ruppert@abilis.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pierrick.hascoet@abilis.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.