Re: New meta-cubox layer

[Philip Balister <philip@balister.org>]

On 04/03/2013 03:57 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> 
> 
> Op 3 apr. 2013 om 21:34 heeft Philip Balister <philip@balister.org> het volgende geschreven:
> 
>> On 04/03/2013 02:38 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>> Op 03-04-13 18:50, Carlos Rafael Giani schreef:
>>>
>>> Just like https://github.com/naguirre/meta-cubox you're mixing
>>> DISTRO policy in the machine files by setting the tuning to
>>> hardfloat. Don't do that. If you want hardfloat, set that in your
>>> distro config, not in your machine config.
>>
>> This keeps coming up, but I do not see an answer that works for people
>> creating BSP's that work with just oe-core and a BSP layer.
>>
>> How are we supposed to set TUNE parameters for this case? And yes,
>> this case *must* produce useful output.
> 
> Local.conf

Fail. This means BSP providers are depending on users to do the right thing.

The BSP should be able to say what it wants and a distro layer needs to
override the BSP choice for distributions providing binaries for
multiple machines.

Philip


> 
> 
> 
>>
>> Philip
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel
>>> mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org 
>>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>>>
>>>
>>>
> 
>