Re: New meta-cubox layer

[Philip Balister <philip@balister.org>]

On 04/03/2013 05:43 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Philip Balister <philip@balister.org> wrote:
>> On 04/03/2013 02:38 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>> Op 03-04-13 18:50, Carlos Rafael Giani schreef:
>>>
>>> Just like https://github.com/naguirre/meta-cubox you're mixing
>>> DISTRO policy in the machine files by setting the tuning to
>>> hardfloat. Don't do that. If you want hardfloat, set that in your
>>> distro config, not in your machine config.
>>>
>>
>> This keeps coming up, but I do not see an answer that works for people
>> creating BSP's that work with just oe-core and a BSP layer.
>>
>> How are we supposed to set TUNE parameters for this case? And yes,
>> this case *must* produce useful output.
> 
> I don't think TUNE is a distro thing. It is indeed a board setting and
> I expect every board to have a good know TUNE setting.

The problem is if you are building for several machines, you may want to
force the same tune settings for several machines that are different
from what the BSP owner "declared" the default to be. Otherwise all
packages become per machine.

Philip

> 
> --
> Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
> E-mail: otavio@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
> Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854              http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> 
>