Re: [PATCH 0/4] kprobes: split blacklist into common and arch

[Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>]

Hi Oskar,

On 04/03/2013 01:58 PM, oskar.andero@sonymobile.com wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This is a slight rework of the following patches which I posted earlier:
> [PATCH] Kprobes blacklist: Conditionally add x86-specific symbols
> [PATCH] delay blacklist symbol lookup until we actually need it
> 
> This serie includes a patch that moves the architecture dependent black points
> to the arch/ directory and the x86 patch was modified to follow that patch.
> 
> -Oskar
> 
> Björn Davidsson (1):
>   kprobes: move x86-specific blacklist symbols to arch directory
> 
> Oskar Andero (2):
>   kprobes: split blacklist into common and arch
>   kprobes: replace printk with pr_-functions
> 
> Toby Collett (1):
>   kprobes: delay blacklist symbol lookup until we actually need it
> 
>  arch/arc/kernel/kprobes.c      |   3 +
>  arch/arm/kernel/kprobes.c      |   2 +
>  arch/avr32/kernel/kprobes.c    |   3 +
>  arch/ia64/kernel/kprobes.c     |   3 +
>  arch/mips/kernel/kprobes.c     |   3 +
>  arch/mn10300/kernel/kprobes.c  |   2 +
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c  |   3 +
>  arch/s390/kernel/kprobes.c     |   3 +
>  arch/sh/kernel/kprobes.c       |   3 +
>  arch/sparc/kernel/kprobes.c    |   3 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c |   7 ++
>  kernel/kprobes.c               | 149 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  12 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
> 

For any arch changes, however trivial they might be, you need to CC the respective
maintainers, or atleast post the patches on linux-arch so we know what's going on !


Thx,
-Vineet