From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
davinci-linux-open-source-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org,
Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: davinci: rename "i2c_recover_bus" function
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 10:51:56 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <515E5F74.5050505@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpomq6YzfftrHEnx5gqxjK8bagaRZbH=e_f2ZaRVgAspHkw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
On 4/4/2013 7:37 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 4 April 2013 19:24, Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> As of commit 5f9296ba "i2c: Add bus recovery infrastructure", there
>> is now a global function with the same name, which clashes with
>> the davinci specific one. The obvious solution is to rename the
>> function with a davinci prefix.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
>> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
>> Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
>> Cc: davinci-linux-open-source-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org
>> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
>> Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
>
> But i believe this stuff should be updated to use the generic recovery
> infrastructure, as it is in now.
>
> @Sekhar: Are you looking after it?
No, not in my plans ATM.
Thanks,
Sekhar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-05 5:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-04 13:54 [PATCH] i2c: davinci: rename "i2c_recover_bus" function Arnd Bergmann
[not found] ` <201304041354.30024.arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-04 14:07 ` Viresh Kumar
[not found] ` <CAKohpomq6YzfftrHEnx5gqxjK8bagaRZbH=e_f2ZaRVgAspHkw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-05 5:21 ` Sekhar Nori [this message]
2013-04-04 20:42 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=515E5F74.5050505@ti.com \
--to=nsekhar-l0cymroini0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=davinci-linux-open-source-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.