From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: balbi@ti.com
Cc: khilman@deeprootsystems.com, tony@atomide.com,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: OMAP4+: PM: Consolidate OMAP4 PM code to re-use it for OMAP5
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 19:05:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <515ED31A.3000307@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130405132150.GN11464@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
On Friday 05 April 2013 06:51 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 06:29:01PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> OMAP5 has backward compatible PRCM block and it's programming
>> model is mostly similar to OMAP4. Same is going to be maintained
>> for future OMAP4 based SOCs. Hence consolidate the OMAP4 power
>> management code so that it can be re-used on OMAP5 and later devices.
>>
>> While at it, update the kernel-doc for omap4_pm_init().
>>
>> Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile | 9 +--
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/{pm44xx.c => pm_omap4plus.c} | 58 ++++++++++++++++----
>> .../mach-omap2/{sleep44xx.S => sleep_omap4plus.S} | 0
>> 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>> rename arch/arm/mach-omap2/{pm44xx.c => pm_omap4plus.c} (83%)
>> rename arch/arm/mach-omap2/{sleep44xx.S => sleep_omap4plus.S} (100%)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile
>> index b068b7f..3e59895 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile
>> @@ -35,14 +35,14 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_HAS_OMAP2_SDRC) += sdrc.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += omap-smp.o omap-headsmp.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) += omap-hotplug.o
>> omap-4-5-common = omap4-common.o omap-wakeupgen.o \
>> - sleep44xx.o
>> + sleep_omap4plus.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP4) += $(omap-4-5-common)
>> obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_OMAP5) += $(omap-4-5-common)
>>
>> plus_sec := $(call as-instr,.arch_extension sec,+sec)
>> AFLAGS_omap-headsmp.o :=-Wa,-march=armv7-a$(plus_sec)
>> AFLAGS_omap-smc.o :=-Wa,-march=armv7-a$(plus_sec)
>> -AFLAGS_sleep44xx.o :=-Wa,-march=armv7-a$(plus_sec)
>> +AFLAGS_sleep_omap4plus.o :=-Wa,-march=armv7-a$(plus_sec)
>>
>> # Functions loaded to SRAM
>> obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_OMAP2420) += sram242x.o
>> @@ -80,11 +80,12 @@ endif
>> obj-$(CONFIG_OMAP_PM_NOOP) += omap-pm-noop.o
>>
>> ifeq ($(CONFIG_PM),y)
>> +omap4plus-common-pm = omap-mpuss-lowpower.o pm_omap4plus.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2) += pm24xx.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2) += sleep24xx.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3) += pm34xx.o sleep34xx.o
>> -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP4) += pm44xx.o omap-mpuss-lowpower.o
>> -obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_OMAP5) += omap-mpuss-lowpower.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP4) += $(omap4plus-common-pm)
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_OMAP5) += $(omap4plus-common-pm)
>> obj-$(CONFIG_PM_DEBUG) += pm-debug.o
>>
>> obj-$(CONFIG_POWER_AVS_OMAP) += sr_device.o
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm_omap4plus.c
>> similarity index 83%
>> rename from arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c
>> rename to arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm_omap4plus.c
>> index 5ba6d88..228deca 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm_omap4plus.c
>> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>> /*
>> - * OMAP4 Power Management Routines
>> + * OMAP4+ Power Management Routines
>> *
>> - * Copyright (C) 2010-2011 Texas Instruments, Inc.
>> + * Copyright (C) 2010-2013 Texas Instruments, Inc.
>> * Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
>> * Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
>> *
>> @@ -135,16 +135,16 @@ static void omap_default_idle(void)
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> - * omap4_pm_init - Init routine for OMAP4 PM
>> + * omap4_init_static_deps - Add OMAP4 static dependencies
>> *
>> - * Initializes all powerdomain and clockdomain target states
>> - * and all PRCM settings.
>> + * Add needed static clockdomain dependencies on OMAP4 devices.
>> + * Return: 0 on success or 'err' on failures
>> */
>> -int __init omap4_pm_init(void)
>> +static inline int omap4_init_static_deps(void)
>
> you can let compiler inline this if it chooses to, right ?? Otherwise,
> if you really want to make sure this will be inlined, you could(should?)
> be using __always_inline.
>
Compilers are smart now so that fine.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: OMAP4+: PM: Consolidate OMAP4 PM code to re-use it for OMAP5
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 19:05:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <515ED31A.3000307@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130405132150.GN11464@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
On Friday 05 April 2013 06:51 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 06:29:01PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> OMAP5 has backward compatible PRCM block and it's programming
>> model is mostly similar to OMAP4. Same is going to be maintained
>> for future OMAP4 based SOCs. Hence consolidate the OMAP4 power
>> management code so that it can be re-used on OMAP5 and later devices.
>>
>> While at it, update the kernel-doc for omap4_pm_init().
>>
>> Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile | 9 +--
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/{pm44xx.c => pm_omap4plus.c} | 58 ++++++++++++++++----
>> .../mach-omap2/{sleep44xx.S => sleep_omap4plus.S} | 0
>> 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>> rename arch/arm/mach-omap2/{pm44xx.c => pm_omap4plus.c} (83%)
>> rename arch/arm/mach-omap2/{sleep44xx.S => sleep_omap4plus.S} (100%)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile
>> index b068b7f..3e59895 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile
>> @@ -35,14 +35,14 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_HAS_OMAP2_SDRC) += sdrc.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += omap-smp.o omap-headsmp.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) += omap-hotplug.o
>> omap-4-5-common = omap4-common.o omap-wakeupgen.o \
>> - sleep44xx.o
>> + sleep_omap4plus.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP4) += $(omap-4-5-common)
>> obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_OMAP5) += $(omap-4-5-common)
>>
>> plus_sec := $(call as-instr,.arch_extension sec,+sec)
>> AFLAGS_omap-headsmp.o :=-Wa,-march=armv7-a$(plus_sec)
>> AFLAGS_omap-smc.o :=-Wa,-march=armv7-a$(plus_sec)
>> -AFLAGS_sleep44xx.o :=-Wa,-march=armv7-a$(plus_sec)
>> +AFLAGS_sleep_omap4plus.o :=-Wa,-march=armv7-a$(plus_sec)
>>
>> # Functions loaded to SRAM
>> obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_OMAP2420) += sram242x.o
>> @@ -80,11 +80,12 @@ endif
>> obj-$(CONFIG_OMAP_PM_NOOP) += omap-pm-noop.o
>>
>> ifeq ($(CONFIG_PM),y)
>> +omap4plus-common-pm = omap-mpuss-lowpower.o pm_omap4plus.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2) += pm24xx.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2) += sleep24xx.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3) += pm34xx.o sleep34xx.o
>> -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP4) += pm44xx.o omap-mpuss-lowpower.o
>> -obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_OMAP5) += omap-mpuss-lowpower.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP4) += $(omap4plus-common-pm)
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_OMAP5) += $(omap4plus-common-pm)
>> obj-$(CONFIG_PM_DEBUG) += pm-debug.o
>>
>> obj-$(CONFIG_POWER_AVS_OMAP) += sr_device.o
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm_omap4plus.c
>> similarity index 83%
>> rename from arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c
>> rename to arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm_omap4plus.c
>> index 5ba6d88..228deca 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm_omap4plus.c
>> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>> /*
>> - * OMAP4 Power Management Routines
>> + * OMAP4+ Power Management Routines
>> *
>> - * Copyright (C) 2010-2011 Texas Instruments, Inc.
>> + * Copyright (C) 2010-2013 Texas Instruments, Inc.
>> * Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
>> * Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
>> *
>> @@ -135,16 +135,16 @@ static void omap_default_idle(void)
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> - * omap4_pm_init - Init routine for OMAP4 PM
>> + * omap4_init_static_deps - Add OMAP4 static dependencies
>> *
>> - * Initializes all powerdomain and clockdomain target states
>> - * and all PRCM settings.
>> + * Add needed static clockdomain dependencies on OMAP4 devices.
>> + * Return: 0 on success or 'err' on failures
>> */
>> -int __init omap4_pm_init(void)
>> +static inline int omap4_init_static_deps(void)
>
> you can let compiler inline this if it chooses to, right ?? Otherwise,
> if you really want to make sure this will be inlined, you could(should?)
> be using __always_inline.
>
Compilers are smart now so that fine.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-05 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-05 12:58 [PATCH v3 0/4] ARM: OMAP4+: PM: Consolidate code for re-use on OMAP5 Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-05 12:58 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-05 12:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] ARM: OMAP4+: PM: Consolidate MPU subsystem PM code for re-use Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-05 12:59 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-05 13:19 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-04-05 13:19 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-04-05 13:35 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-04-05 13:35 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-04-05 13:39 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-05 13:39 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-05 14:04 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-04-05 14:04 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-04-05 14:18 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-04-05 14:18 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-04-05 14:29 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-04-05 14:29 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-04-05 13:37 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-05 13:37 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-05 12:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: OMAP4+: PM: Consolidate OMAP4 PM code to re-use it for OMAP5 Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-05 12:59 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-05 13:21 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-04-05 13:21 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-04-05 13:35 ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2013-04-05 13:35 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-05 21:34 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-04-05 21:34 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-04-08 10:48 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-08 10:48 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-08 16:42 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-04-08 16:42 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-04-09 6:13 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-09 6:13 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-09 16:55 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-04-09 16:55 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-04-10 6:17 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-10 6:17 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-05 12:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] ARM: OMAP4+: Make secondary_startup function name more consistent Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-05 12:59 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-05 12:59 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] ARM: OMAP4+: CPUidle: Consolidate idle driver for OMAP5 support Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-05 12:59 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-05 21:29 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-04-05 21:29 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-04-05 23:42 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] ARM: OMAP4+: PM: Consolidate code for re-use on OMAP5 Kevin Hilman
2013-04-05 23:42 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-04-08 11:03 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-08 11:03 ` Santosh Shilimkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=515ED31A.3000307@ti.com \
--to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.