Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] memcg: make memcg's life cycle the same as cgroup

[Glauber Costa <glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>]

On 04/07/2013 12:44 PM, Li Zefan wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm rebasing this patchset against latest linux-next, and it conflicts with
> "[PATCH v2] memcg: debugging facility to access dangling memcgs." slightly.
> 
> That is a debugging patch and will never be pushed into mainline, so should I
> still base this patchset on that debugging patch?
> 
It will conflict as well with my shrinking patches: I will still keep
the memcgs in the dangling list, but that will have nothing to do with
debugging. So I will split that patch in a list management part, which
will be used, and a debugging part (with the file + the debugging
information).

I will be happy to rebase it ontop of your series.

> Also that patch needs update (and can be simplified) after this patchset:
> - move memcg_dangling_add() to mem_cgroup_css_offline()
> - remove memcg->memcg_name, and use cgroup_path() in mem_cgroup_dangling_read()?
> 

Don't worry about it. If this is just this one patch conflicting, I
would avise Andrew to remove it, and I will provide another (maybe two,
already splitted up) version.