machinename with dash in it

machinename with dash in it

[Jaap de Jong]

Hi All,
something strange happens with my machinename with a dash in it: x-y
If I bitbake some image it will end up that netbase is not found.
Inspection of build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_12-eglibc/work shows 2 variants 
of x-y: one with a dash and one where the dash is replaced by an 
underscore: x-y and x_y
In x-y only netbase is found, rest of the machinespecific packages are 
in x_y
Creating the image fails with the message that netbase is not found...
Any ideas?
Jaap

Re: machinename with dash in it

[Martin Jansa]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 857 bytes --]

On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 02:28:51PM +0200, Jaap de Jong wrote:
> Hi All,
> something strange happens with my machinename with a dash in it: x-y
> If I bitbake some image it will end up that netbase is not found.
> Inspection of build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_12-eglibc/work shows 2 variants 
> of x-y: one with a dash and one where the dash is replaced by an 
> underscore: x-y and x_y
> In x-y only netbase is found, rest of the machinespecific packages are 
> in x_y

MACHINE_ARCH is MACHINE with s/-/_/g (because rpm had issues with -) so it's expected.

> Creating the image fails with the message that netbase is not found...
> Any ideas?

It's probably caused by
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4102
do manual cleanup described there and it should work fine.

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]

Re: machinename with dash in it

[Koen Kooi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Op 08-04-13 15:17, Martin Jansa schreef:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 02:28:51PM +0200, Jaap de Jong wrote:
>> Hi All, something strange happens with my machinename with a dash in
>> it: x-y If I bitbake some image it will end up that netbase is not
>> found. Inspection of build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_12-eglibc/work shows 2
>> variants of x-y: one with a dash and one where the dash is replaced by
>> an underscore: x-y and x_y In x-y only netbase is found, rest of the
>> machinespecific packages are in x_y
> 
> MACHINE_ARCH is MACHINE with s/-/_/g (because rpm had issues with -) so
> it's expected.
> 
>> Creating the image fails with the message that netbase is not found... 
>> Any ideas?
> 
> It's probably caused by 
> https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4102 do manual cleanup
> described there and it should work fine.

The root cause was this one:
https://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=openembedded/meta-linaro.git;a=commit;h=30f353c072336ad764e9528ae3c508adb28fa4ad

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iD8DBQFRYyA+MkyGM64RGpERAlOqAKCo06UHU8N5U7rGLyddRl8vjS9cBgCgka+u
Zlnl+rXes1ntNxNASOrc6pY=
=Tjzk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: machinename with dash in it

[Martin Jansa]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1302 bytes --]

On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 09:53:34PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Op 08-04-13 15:17, Martin Jansa schreef:
> > On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 02:28:51PM +0200, Jaap de Jong wrote:
> >> Hi All, something strange happens with my machinename with a dash in
> >> it: x-y If I bitbake some image it will end up that netbase is not
> >> found. Inspection of build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_12-eglibc/work shows 2
> >> variants of x-y: one with a dash and one where the dash is replaced by
> >> an underscore: x-y and x_y In x-y only netbase is found, rest of the
> >> machinespecific packages are in x_y
> > 
> > MACHINE_ARCH is MACHINE with s/-/_/g (because rpm had issues with -) so
> > it's expected.
> > 
> >> Creating the image fails with the message that netbase is not found... 
> >> Any ideas?
> > 
> > It's probably caused by 
> > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4102 do manual cleanup
> > described there and it should work fine.
> 
> The root cause was this one:
> https://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=openembedded/meta-linaro.git;a=commit;h=30f353c072336ad764e9528ae3c508adb28fa4ad

Heh, I was expecting that all MACHINEs in PACKAGE_ARCH died long time
ago.

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]

Re: machinename with dash in it

[Jaap de Jong]

On 04/08/2013 10:15 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 09:53:34PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Op 08-04-13 15:17, Martin Jansa schreef:
>>> On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 02:28:51PM +0200, Jaap de Jong wrote:
>>>> Hi All, something strange happens with my machinename with a dash in
>>>> it: x-y If I bitbake some image it will end up that netbase is not
>>>> found. Inspection of build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_12-eglibc/work shows 2
>>>> variants of x-y: one with a dash and one where the dash is replaced by
>>>> an underscore: x-y and x_y In x-y only netbase is found, rest of the
>>>> machinespecific packages are in x_y
>>> MACHINE_ARCH is MACHINE with s/-/_/g (because rpm had issues with -) so
>>> it's expected.
>>>
>>>> Creating the image fails with the message that netbase is not found...
>>>> Any ideas?
>>> It's probably caused by
>>> https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4102 do manual cleanup
>>> described there and it should work fine.
>> The root cause was this one:
>> https://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=openembedded/meta-linaro.git;a=commit;h=30f353c072336ad764e9528ae3c508adb28fa4ad
> Heh, I was expecting that all MACHINEs in PACKAGE_ARCH died long time
> ago.
>
Thanks for the hint, this is fixed now.
(I have a new error though....)
Jaap