[PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: exynos5440: add gpio interrupt

[PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: exynos5440: add gpio interrupt

[Kukjin Kim]

This patch updates supporting pinctrl for exynos5440 and based on top of for-next branch of samsung tree.

 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi    |    2 +
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos5440.c |  151 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

[PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: exynos5440: fix probe failure due to missing
[PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: exynos5440: add gpio interrupt support
[PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: list the interrupts generated by

[PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: exynos5440: add gpio interrupt

[Kukjin Kim]

This patch updates supporting pinctrl for exynos5440 and based on top of for-next branch of samsung tree.

 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi    |    2 +
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos5440.c |  151 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

[PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: exynos5440: fix probe failure due to missing
[PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: exynos5440: add gpio interrupt support
[PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: list the interrupts generated by

[PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: exynos5440: fix probe failure due to missing pin-list in config nodes

[Kukjin Kim]

From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>

The property 'samsung,exynos5440-pins' is optional in configuration nodes
which are included in the Exynos5440 pin-controller device node. Fix the
incorrect failure in driver probe if 'samsung,exynos5440-pins' property
is not found in the configuration nodes.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos5440.c |    9 ++++++---
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos5440.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos5440.c
index 1376eb7..96cb1e9 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos5440.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos5440.c
@@ -670,8 +670,10 @@ static int exynos5440_pinctrl_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
 
 		ret = exynos5440_pinctrl_parse_dt_pins(pdev, cfg_np,
 					&pin_list, &npins);
-		if (ret)
-			return ret;
+		if (ret) {
+			gname = NULL;
+			goto skip_to_pin_function;
+		}
 
 		/* derive pin group name from the node name */
 		gname = devm_kzalloc(dev, strlen(cfg_np->name) + GSUFFIX_LEN,
@@ -687,6 +689,7 @@ static int exynos5440_pinctrl_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
 		grp->num_pins = npins;
 		grp++;
 
+skip_to_pin_function:
 		ret = of_property_read_u32(cfg_np, "samsung,exynos5440-pin-function",
 						&function);
 		if (ret)
@@ -709,7 +712,7 @@ static int exynos5440_pinctrl_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
 			return -ENOMEM;
 		}
 		func->groups[0] = gname;
-		func->num_groups = 1;
+		func->num_groups = gname ? 1 : 0;
 		func->function = function;
 		func++;
 		func_idx++;
-- 
1.7.4.4

[PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: exynos5440: fix probe failure due to missing pin-list in config nodes

[Kukjin Kim]

From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>

The property 'samsung,exynos5440-pins' is optional in configuration nodes
which are included in the Exynos5440 pin-controller device node. Fix the
incorrect failure in driver probe if 'samsung,exynos5440-pins' property
is not found in the configuration nodes.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos5440.c |    9 ++++++---
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos5440.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos5440.c
index 1376eb7..96cb1e9 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos5440.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos5440.c
@@ -670,8 +670,10 @@ static int exynos5440_pinctrl_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
 
 		ret = exynos5440_pinctrl_parse_dt_pins(pdev, cfg_np,
 					&pin_list, &npins);
-		if (ret)
-			return ret;
+		if (ret) {
+			gname = NULL;
+			goto skip_to_pin_function;
+		}
 
 		/* derive pin group name from the node name */
 		gname = devm_kzalloc(dev, strlen(cfg_np->name) + GSUFFIX_LEN,
@@ -687,6 +689,7 @@ static int exynos5440_pinctrl_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
 		grp->num_pins = npins;
 		grp++;
 
+skip_to_pin_function:
 		ret = of_property_read_u32(cfg_np, "samsung,exynos5440-pin-function",
 						&function);
 		if (ret)
@@ -709,7 +712,7 @@ static int exynos5440_pinctrl_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
 			return -ENOMEM;
 		}
 		func->groups[0] = gname;
-		func->num_groups = 1;
+		func->num_groups = gname ? 1 : 0;
 		func->function = function;
 		func++;
 		func_idx++;
-- 
1.7.4.4

Re: [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: exynos5440: fix probe failure due to missing pin-list in config nodes

[Linus Walleij]

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:

> From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
>
> The property 'samsung,exynos5440-pins' is optional in configuration nodes
> which are included in the Exynos5440 pin-controller device node. Fix the
> incorrect failure in driver probe if 'samsung,exynos5440-pins' property
> is not found in the configuration nodes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>

Patch applied!

Thanks,
Linus Walleij

[PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: exynos5440: fix probe failure due to missing pin-list in config nodes

[Linus Walleij]

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:

> From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
>
> The property 'samsung,exynos5440-pins' is optional in configuration nodes
> which are included in the Exynos5440 pin-controller device node. Fix the
> incorrect failure in driver probe if 'samsung,exynos5440-pins' property
> is not found in the configuration nodes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>

Patch applied!

Thanks,
Linus Walleij

[PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: exynos5440: add gpio interrupt support

[Kukjin Kim]

From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>

Exynos5440 supports gpio interrupts on gpios 16 to 23. The eight interrupt lines
originating from the pin-controller are connected to the gic. Add irq-chip support
for these interrupts.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos5440.c |  142 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos5440.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos5440.c
index 96cb1e9..b5c5014 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos5440.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos5440.c
@@ -20,6 +20,9 @@
 #include <linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h>
 #include <linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h>
 #include <linux/pinctrl/pinconf.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
+#include <linux/of_irq.h>
 #include "core.h"
 
 /* EXYNOS5440 GPIO and Pinctrl register offsets */
@@ -37,6 +40,7 @@
 #define GPIO_DS1		0x2C
 
 #define EXYNOS5440_MAX_PINS		23
+#define EXYNOS5440_MAX_GPIO_INT	8
 #define PIN_NAME_LENGTH		10
 
 #define GROUP_SUFFIX		"-grp"
@@ -109,6 +113,7 @@ struct exynos5440_pmx_func {
 struct exynos5440_pinctrl_priv_data {
 	void __iomem			*reg_base;
 	struct gpio_chip		*gc;
+	struct irq_domain		*irq_domain;
 
 	const struct exynos5440_pin_group	*pin_groups;
 	unsigned int			nr_groups;
@@ -116,6 +121,16 @@ struct exynos5440_pinctrl_priv_data {
 	unsigned int			nr_functions;
 };
 
+/**
+ * struct exynos5440_gpio_intr_data: private data for gpio interrupts.
+ * @priv: driver's private runtime data.
+ * @gpio_int: gpio interrupt number.
+ */
+struct exynos5440_gpio_intr_data {
+	struct exynos5440_pinctrl_priv_data	*priv;
+	unsigned int				gpio_int;
+};
+
 /* list of all possible config options supported */
 static struct pin_config {
 	char		*prop_cfg;
@@ -598,6 +613,22 @@ static int exynos5440_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offse
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/* gpiolib gpio_to_irq callback function */
+static int exynos5440_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset)
+{
+	struct exynos5440_pinctrl_priv_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(gc->dev);
+	unsigned int virq;
+
+	if (offset < 16 || offset > 23)
+		return -ENXIO;
+
+	if (!priv->irq_domain)
+		return -ENXIO;
+
+	virq = irq_create_mapping(priv->irq_domain, offset - 16);
+	return virq ? : -ENXIO;
+}
+
 /* parse the pin numbers listed in the 'samsung,exynos5440-pins' property */
 static int exynos5440_pinctrl_parse_dt_pins(struct platform_device *pdev,
 			struct device_node *cfg_np, unsigned int **pin_list,
@@ -821,6 +852,7 @@ static int exynos5440_gpiolib_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
 	gc->get = exynos5440_gpio_get;
 	gc->direction_input = exynos5440_gpio_direction_input;
 	gc->direction_output = exynos5440_gpio_direction_output;
+	gc->to_irq = exynos5440_gpio_to_irq;
 	gc->label = "gpiolib-exynos5440";
 	gc->owner = THIS_MODULE;
 	ret = gpiochip_add(gc);
@@ -845,6 +877,110 @@ static int exynos5440_gpiolib_unregister(struct platform_device *pdev,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void exynos5440_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *irqd)
+{
+	struct exynos5440_pinctrl_priv_data *d;
+	unsigned long gpio_int;
+
+	d = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(irqd);
+	gpio_int = readl(d->reg_base + GPIO_INT);
+	gpio_int |= 1 << irqd->hwirq;
+	writel(gpio_int, d->reg_base + GPIO_INT);
+}
+
+static void exynos5440_gpio_irq_mask(struct irq_data *irqd)
+{
+	struct exynos5440_pinctrl_priv_data *d;
+	unsigned long gpio_int;
+
+	d = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(irqd);
+	gpio_int = readl(d->reg_base + GPIO_INT);
+	gpio_int &= ~(1 << irqd->hwirq);
+	writel(gpio_int, d->reg_base + GPIO_INT);
+}
+
+/* irq_chip for gpio interrupts */
+static struct irq_chip exynos5440_gpio_irq_chip = {
+	.name		= "exynos5440_gpio_irq_chip",
+	.irq_unmask	= exynos5440_gpio_irq_unmask,
+	.irq_mask	= exynos5440_gpio_irq_mask,
+};
+
+/* interrupt handler for GPIO interrupts 0..7 */
+static irqreturn_t exynos5440_gpio_irq(int irq, void *data)
+{
+	struct exynos5440_gpio_intr_data *intd = data;
+	struct exynos5440_pinctrl_priv_data *d = intd->priv;
+	int virq;
+
+	virq = irq_linear_revmap(d->irq_domain, intd->gpio_int);
+	if (!virq)
+		return IRQ_NONE;
+	generic_handle_irq(virq);
+	return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static int exynos5440_gpio_irq_map(struct irq_domain *h, unsigned int virq,
+					irq_hw_number_t hw)
+{
+	struct exynos5440_pinctrl_priv_data *d = h->host_data;
+
+	irq_set_chip_data(virq, d);
+	irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &exynos5440_gpio_irq_chip,
+					handle_level_irq);
+	set_irq_flags(virq, IRQF_VALID);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/* irq domain callbacks for gpio interrupt controller */
+static const struct irq_domain_ops exynos5440_gpio_irqd_ops = {
+	.map	= exynos5440_gpio_irq_map,
+	.xlate	= irq_domain_xlate_twocell,
+};
+
+/* setup handling of gpio interrupts */
+static int exynos5440_gpio_irq_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
+				struct exynos5440_pinctrl_priv_data *priv)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct exynos5440_gpio_intr_data *intd;
+	int i, irq, ret;
+
+	intd = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*intd) * EXYNOS5440_MAX_GPIO_INT,
+					GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!intd) {
+		dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate memory for gpio intr data\n");
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < EXYNOS5440_MAX_GPIO_INT; i++) {
+		irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(dev->of_node, i);
+		if (irq <= 0) {
+			dev_err(dev, "irq parsing failed\n");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		intd->gpio_int = i;
+		intd->priv = priv;
+		ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, exynos5440_gpio_irq,
+					0, dev_name(dev), intd++);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(dev, "irq request failed\n");
+			return -ENXIO;
+		}
+	}
+
+	priv->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(dev->of_node,
+				EXYNOS5440_MAX_GPIO_INT,
+				&exynos5440_gpio_irqd_ops, priv);
+	if (!priv->irq_domain) {
+		dev_err(dev, "failed to create irq domain\n");
+		return -ENXIO;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int exynos5440_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
@@ -883,6 +1019,12 @@ static int exynos5440_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
+	ret = exynos5440_gpio_irq_init(pdev, priv);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(dev, "failed to setup gpio interrupts\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
 	dev_info(dev, "EXYNOS5440 pinctrl driver registered\n");
 	return 0;
-- 
1.7.4.4

[PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: exynos5440: add gpio interrupt support

[Kukjin Kim]

From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>

Exynos5440 supports gpio interrupts on gpios 16 to 23. The eight interrupt lines
originating from the pin-controller are connected to the gic. Add irq-chip support
for these interrupts.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos5440.c |  142 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos5440.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos5440.c
index 96cb1e9..b5c5014 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos5440.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos5440.c
@@ -20,6 +20,9 @@
 #include <linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h>
 #include <linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h>
 #include <linux/pinctrl/pinconf.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
+#include <linux/of_irq.h>
 #include "core.h"
 
 /* EXYNOS5440 GPIO and Pinctrl register offsets */
@@ -37,6 +40,7 @@
 #define GPIO_DS1		0x2C
 
 #define EXYNOS5440_MAX_PINS		23
+#define EXYNOS5440_MAX_GPIO_INT	8
 #define PIN_NAME_LENGTH		10
 
 #define GROUP_SUFFIX		"-grp"
@@ -109,6 +113,7 @@ struct exynos5440_pmx_func {
 struct exynos5440_pinctrl_priv_data {
 	void __iomem			*reg_base;
 	struct gpio_chip		*gc;
+	struct irq_domain		*irq_domain;
 
 	const struct exynos5440_pin_group	*pin_groups;
 	unsigned int			nr_groups;
@@ -116,6 +121,16 @@ struct exynos5440_pinctrl_priv_data {
 	unsigned int			nr_functions;
 };
 
+/**
+ * struct exynos5440_gpio_intr_data: private data for gpio interrupts.
+ * @priv: driver's private runtime data.
+ * @gpio_int: gpio interrupt number.
+ */
+struct exynos5440_gpio_intr_data {
+	struct exynos5440_pinctrl_priv_data	*priv;
+	unsigned int				gpio_int;
+};
+
 /* list of all possible config options supported */
 static struct pin_config {
 	char		*prop_cfg;
@@ -598,6 +613,22 @@ static int exynos5440_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offse
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/* gpiolib gpio_to_irq callback function */
+static int exynos5440_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset)
+{
+	struct exynos5440_pinctrl_priv_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(gc->dev);
+	unsigned int virq;
+
+	if (offset < 16 || offset > 23)
+		return -ENXIO;
+
+	if (!priv->irq_domain)
+		return -ENXIO;
+
+	virq = irq_create_mapping(priv->irq_domain, offset - 16);
+	return virq ? : -ENXIO;
+}
+
 /* parse the pin numbers listed in the 'samsung,exynos5440-pins' property */
 static int exynos5440_pinctrl_parse_dt_pins(struct platform_device *pdev,
 			struct device_node *cfg_np, unsigned int **pin_list,
@@ -821,6 +852,7 @@ static int exynos5440_gpiolib_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
 	gc->get = exynos5440_gpio_get;
 	gc->direction_input = exynos5440_gpio_direction_input;
 	gc->direction_output = exynos5440_gpio_direction_output;
+	gc->to_irq = exynos5440_gpio_to_irq;
 	gc->label = "gpiolib-exynos5440";
 	gc->owner = THIS_MODULE;
 	ret = gpiochip_add(gc);
@@ -845,6 +877,110 @@ static int exynos5440_gpiolib_unregister(struct platform_device *pdev,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void exynos5440_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *irqd)
+{
+	struct exynos5440_pinctrl_priv_data *d;
+	unsigned long gpio_int;
+
+	d = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(irqd);
+	gpio_int = readl(d->reg_base + GPIO_INT);
+	gpio_int |= 1 << irqd->hwirq;
+	writel(gpio_int, d->reg_base + GPIO_INT);
+}
+
+static void exynos5440_gpio_irq_mask(struct irq_data *irqd)
+{
+	struct exynos5440_pinctrl_priv_data *d;
+	unsigned long gpio_int;
+
+	d = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(irqd);
+	gpio_int = readl(d->reg_base + GPIO_INT);
+	gpio_int &= ~(1 << irqd->hwirq);
+	writel(gpio_int, d->reg_base + GPIO_INT);
+}
+
+/* irq_chip for gpio interrupts */
+static struct irq_chip exynos5440_gpio_irq_chip = {
+	.name		= "exynos5440_gpio_irq_chip",
+	.irq_unmask	= exynos5440_gpio_irq_unmask,
+	.irq_mask	= exynos5440_gpio_irq_mask,
+};
+
+/* interrupt handler for GPIO interrupts 0..7 */
+static irqreturn_t exynos5440_gpio_irq(int irq, void *data)
+{
+	struct exynos5440_gpio_intr_data *intd = data;
+	struct exynos5440_pinctrl_priv_data *d = intd->priv;
+	int virq;
+
+	virq = irq_linear_revmap(d->irq_domain, intd->gpio_int);
+	if (!virq)
+		return IRQ_NONE;
+	generic_handle_irq(virq);
+	return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static int exynos5440_gpio_irq_map(struct irq_domain *h, unsigned int virq,
+					irq_hw_number_t hw)
+{
+	struct exynos5440_pinctrl_priv_data *d = h->host_data;
+
+	irq_set_chip_data(virq, d);
+	irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &exynos5440_gpio_irq_chip,
+					handle_level_irq);
+	set_irq_flags(virq, IRQF_VALID);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/* irq domain callbacks for gpio interrupt controller */
+static const struct irq_domain_ops exynos5440_gpio_irqd_ops = {
+	.map	= exynos5440_gpio_irq_map,
+	.xlate	= irq_domain_xlate_twocell,
+};
+
+/* setup handling of gpio interrupts */
+static int exynos5440_gpio_irq_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
+				struct exynos5440_pinctrl_priv_data *priv)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct exynos5440_gpio_intr_data *intd;
+	int i, irq, ret;
+
+	intd = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*intd) * EXYNOS5440_MAX_GPIO_INT,
+					GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!intd) {
+		dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate memory for gpio intr data\n");
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < EXYNOS5440_MAX_GPIO_INT; i++) {
+		irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(dev->of_node, i);
+		if (irq <= 0) {
+			dev_err(dev, "irq parsing failed\n");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		intd->gpio_int = i;
+		intd->priv = priv;
+		ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, exynos5440_gpio_irq,
+					0, dev_name(dev), intd++);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(dev, "irq request failed\n");
+			return -ENXIO;
+		}
+	}
+
+	priv->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(dev->of_node,
+				EXYNOS5440_MAX_GPIO_INT,
+				&exynos5440_gpio_irqd_ops, priv);
+	if (!priv->irq_domain) {
+		dev_err(dev, "failed to create irq domain\n");
+		return -ENXIO;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int exynos5440_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
@@ -883,6 +1019,12 @@ static int exynos5440_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
+	ret = exynos5440_gpio_irq_init(pdev, priv);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(dev, "failed to setup gpio interrupts\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
 	dev_info(dev, "EXYNOS5440 pinctrl driver registered\n");
 	return 0;
-- 
1.7.4.4

Re: [PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: exynos5440: add gpio interrupt support

[Linus Walleij]

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:

> From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
>
> Exynos5440 supports gpio interrupts on gpios 16 to 23. The eight interrupt lines
> originating from the pin-controller are connected to the gic. Add irq-chip support
> for these interrupts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>

Basically really nice. Patch has been applied, but some comments
for future reference:

> +/* gpiolib gpio_to_irq callback function */
> +static int exynos5440_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset)
> +{
> +       struct exynos5440_pinctrl_priv_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(gc->dev);
> +       unsigned int virq;

I'm a bit annoyed by use of the abbreviation "virq" as if the IRQs were
"virtual", they are not - this implies that the Linux IRQ numbers are not
"real" or something.

I use the nomenclature:

irq = Linux IRQ
hwirq = whatever offset that IRQ has in the hardware IRQ controller.

virq I think is confusing...

> +static irqreturn_t exynos5440_gpio_irq(int irq, void *data)
> +{
> +       struct exynos5440_gpio_intr_data *intd = data;
> +       struct exynos5440_pinctrl_priv_data *d = intd->priv;
> +       int virq;
> +
> +       virq = irq_linear_revmap(d->irq_domain, intd->gpio_int);
> +       if (!virq)
> +               return IRQ_NONE;
> +       generic_handle_irq(virq);
> +       return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}

Same here. Actually, I guess irq_linear_revmap works here,
but irq_find_mapping(domain, hwirq) is more archaic, could
you test if that works as well and make a follow-up patch to
change it?

Yours,
Linus Walleij

[PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: exynos5440: add gpio interrupt support

[Linus Walleij]

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:

> From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
>
> Exynos5440 supports gpio interrupts on gpios 16 to 23. The eight interrupt lines
> originating from the pin-controller are connected to the gic. Add irq-chip support
> for these interrupts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>

Basically really nice. Patch has been applied, but some comments
for future reference:

> +/* gpiolib gpio_to_irq callback function */
> +static int exynos5440_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset)
> +{
> +       struct exynos5440_pinctrl_priv_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(gc->dev);
> +       unsigned int virq;

I'm a bit annoyed by use of the abbreviation "virq" as if the IRQs were
"virtual", they are not - this implies that the Linux IRQ numbers are not
"real" or something.

I use the nomenclature:

irq = Linux IRQ
hwirq = whatever offset that IRQ has in the hardware IRQ controller.

virq I think is confusing...

> +static irqreturn_t exynos5440_gpio_irq(int irq, void *data)
> +{
> +       struct exynos5440_gpio_intr_data *intd = data;
> +       struct exynos5440_pinctrl_priv_data *d = intd->priv;
> +       int virq;
> +
> +       virq = irq_linear_revmap(d->irq_domain, intd->gpio_int);
> +       if (!virq)
> +               return IRQ_NONE;
> +       generic_handle_irq(virq);
> +       return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}

Same here. Actually, I guess irq_linear_revmap works here,
but irq_find_mapping(domain, hwirq) is more archaic, could
you test if that works as well and make a follow-up patch to
change it?

Yours,
Linus Walleij

[PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: list the interrupts generated by pin-controller on Exynos5440

[Kukjin Kim]

From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>

Exynos5440 pin-controller generates eight interrupts to support gpio
interrupts. List those interrupt numbers in the pin-controller node.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi
index 25c6134..7132358 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi
@@ -96,6 +96,8 @@
 	pinctrl {
 		compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-pinctrl";
 		reg = <0xE0000 0x1000>;
+		interrupts = <0 37 0>, <0 38 0>, <0 39 0>, <0 40 0>,
+			     <0 41 0>, <0 42 0>, <0 43 0>, <0 44 0>;
 		interrupt-controller;
 		#interrupt-cells = <2>;
 		#gpio-cells = <2>;
-- 
1.7.4.4

[PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: list the interrupts generated by pin-controller on Exynos5440

[Kukjin Kim]

From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>

Exynos5440 pin-controller generates eight interrupts to support gpio
interrupts. List those interrupt numbers in the pin-controller node.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi
index 25c6134..7132358 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi
@@ -96,6 +96,8 @@
 	pinctrl {
 		compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-pinctrl";
 		reg = <0xE0000 0x1000>;
+		interrupts = <0 37 0>, <0 38 0>, <0 39 0>, <0 40 0>,
+			     <0 41 0>, <0 42 0>, <0 43 0>, <0 44 0>;
 		interrupt-controller;
 		#interrupt-cells = <2>;
 		#gpio-cells = <2>;
-- 
1.7.4.4

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: list the interrupts generated by pin-controller on Exynos5440

[Linus Walleij]

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:

> From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
>
> Exynos5440 pin-controller generates eight interrupts to support gpio
> interrupts. List those interrupt numbers in the pin-controller node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>

Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

I guess this will go into the Exynos tree?

Tell me if you want me to apply it to the pinctrl tree.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

[PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: list the interrupts generated by pin-controller on Exynos5440

[Linus Walleij]

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:

> From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
>
> Exynos5440 pin-controller generates eight interrupts to support gpio
> interrupts. List those interrupt numbers in the pin-controller node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>

Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

I guess this will go into the Exynos tree?

Tell me if you want me to apply it to the pinctrl tree.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: list the interrupts generated by pin-controller on Exynos5440

[Kukjin Kim]

On 04/09/13 17:24, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Kukjin Kim<kgene.kim@samsung.com>  wrote:
>
>> From: Thomas Abraham<thomas.ab@samsung.com>
>>
>> Exynos5440 pin-controller generates eight interrupts to support gpio
>> interrupts. List those interrupt numbers in the pin-controller node.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham<thomas.ab@samsung.com>
>> Cc: Linus Walleij<linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim<kgene.kim@samsung.com>
>
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij<linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>
> I guess this will go into the Exynos tree?
>
Yeah, it would be nice to us.

> Tell me if you want me to apply it to the pinctrl tree.
>
Thanks but let me take this into samsung tree.

- Kukjin

[PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: list the interrupts generated by pin-controller on Exynos5440

[Kukjin Kim]

On 04/09/13 17:24, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Kukjin Kim<kgene.kim@samsung.com>  wrote:
>
>> From: Thomas Abraham<thomas.ab@samsung.com>
>>
>> Exynos5440 pin-controller generates eight interrupts to support gpio
>> interrupts. List those interrupt numbers in the pin-controller node.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham<thomas.ab@samsung.com>
>> Cc: Linus Walleij<linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim<kgene.kim@samsung.com>
>
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij<linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>
> I guess this will go into the Exynos tree?
>
Yeah, it would be nice to us.

> Tell me if you want me to apply it to the pinctrl tree.
>
Thanks but let me take this into samsung tree.

- Kukjin