From: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
To: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@chromium.org>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
eduardo.valentin@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: step_wise: set throttle target within thermal instance limits
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 11:00:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51642D21.2060705@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365465371-24652-1-git-send-email-abrestic@chromium.org>
Hi Andrew,
On 08-04-2013 19:56, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
> When selecting a target cooling state in get_target_state(), make sure
> that the state is at least as high as the minimum when the temperature
> is rising and at least as low as the maximum when the temperature is
> falling. Previously the cooling level would only be incremented or
> decremented by one in these cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@chromium.org>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/step_wise.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c b/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
> index 0cd5e9f..49992a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
> @@ -47,9 +47,13 @@ static unsigned long get_target_state(struct thermal_instance *instance,
> if (trend == THERMAL_TREND_RAISING) {
> cur_state = cur_state < instance->upper ?
> (cur_state + 1) : instance->upper;
> + if (cur_state < instance->lower)
> + cur_state = instance->lower;
> } else if (trend == THERMAL_TREND_DROPPING) {
> cur_state = cur_state > instance->lower ?
> (cur_state - 1) : instance->lower;
> + if (cur_state > instance->upper)
> + cur_state = instance->upper;
> }
In which situations cur_state will be out of the [lower;upper]
boundaries? I mean at this point while temperature is rising, and we are
rising the cooling level, we should be already above lower (and
vice-versa). Can you please describe better the situation you are trying
to cover/ that you have identified?
>
> return cur_state;
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
To: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@chromium.org>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>, <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: step_wise: set throttle target within thermal instance limits
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 11:00:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51642D21.2060705@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365465371-24652-1-git-send-email-abrestic@chromium.org>
Hi Andrew,
On 08-04-2013 19:56, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
> When selecting a target cooling state in get_target_state(), make sure
> that the state is at least as high as the minimum when the temperature
> is rising and at least as low as the maximum when the temperature is
> falling. Previously the cooling level would only be incremented or
> decremented by one in these cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@chromium.org>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/step_wise.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c b/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
> index 0cd5e9f..49992a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
> @@ -47,9 +47,13 @@ static unsigned long get_target_state(struct thermal_instance *instance,
> if (trend == THERMAL_TREND_RAISING) {
> cur_state = cur_state < instance->upper ?
> (cur_state + 1) : instance->upper;
> + if (cur_state < instance->lower)
> + cur_state = instance->lower;
> } else if (trend == THERMAL_TREND_DROPPING) {
> cur_state = cur_state > instance->lower ?
> (cur_state - 1) : instance->lower;
> + if (cur_state > instance->upper)
> + cur_state = instance->upper;
> }
In which situations cur_state will be out of the [lower;upper]
boundaries? I mean at this point while temperature is rising, and we are
rising the cooling level, we should be already above lower (and
vice-versa). Can you please describe better the situation you are trying
to cover/ that you have identified?
>
> return cur_state;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-09 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-08 23:56 [PATCH] thermal: step_wise: set throttle target within thermal instance limits Andrew Bresticker
2013-04-09 15:00 ` Eduardo Valentin [this message]
2013-04-09 15:00 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-04-09 17:09 ` Andrew Bresticker
2013-04-09 17:17 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-04-09 17:17 ` Eduardo Valentin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-04-09 21:59 Andrew Bresticker
2013-04-10 7:06 ` Zhang Rui
2013-04-10 20:22 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-04-10 20:22 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-04-11 23:25 ` Zhang Rui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51642D21.2060705@ti.com \
--to=eduardo.valentin@ti.com \
--cc=abrestic@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.