From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
To: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@open-mesh.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH 1/3] if.h: add IFF_BRIDGE_RESTRICTED flag
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 07:03:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5166987B.4030501@mojatatu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130411105628.GA4717@open-mesh.com>
On 13-04-11 06:56 AM, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> I just realised that :)
>
> By installing ebtables (meaning modules + userspace tool) my iperf test result
> drops from 81Mbps to 66Mbps: former without, latter with ebtables module enabled.
> I did this test between two devices connected with Fast Ethernet.
>
Please try tc like i said earlier ;->
cheers,
jamal
> I thought that most of the code is in netfilter, so shared with iptables, hence
> I expected a reasonable overhead why this is much worse.
>
> Does anybody have a clue about this? I should probably start a new thread on the
> netfilter mailing list.
>
> However this problem makes ebtables unusable at all.
>
> Suggestions are welcome :)
>
> Cheers,
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
To: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@open-mesh.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] if.h: add IFF_BRIDGE_RESTRICTED flag
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 07:03:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5166987B.4030501@mojatatu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130411105628.GA4717@open-mesh.com>
On 13-04-11 06:56 AM, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> I just realised that :)
>
> By installing ebtables (meaning modules + userspace tool) my iperf test result
> drops from 81Mbps to 66Mbps: former without, latter with ebtables module enabled.
> I did this test between two devices connected with Fast Ethernet.
>
Please try tc like i said earlier ;->
cheers,
jamal
> I thought that most of the code is in netfilter, so shared with iptables, hence
> I expected a reasonable overhead why this is much worse.
>
> Does anybody have a clue about this? I should probably start a new thread on the
> netfilter mailing list.
>
> However this problem makes ebtables unusable at all.
>
> Suggestions are welcome :)
>
> Cheers,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-11 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-08 17:41 [Bridge] [PATCH 0/3] bridge: implement restricted forwarding policy Antonio Quartulli
2013-04-08 17:41 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-04-08 17:41 ` [Bridge] [PATCH 1/3] if.h: add IFF_BRIDGE_RESTRICTED flag Antonio Quartulli
2013-04-08 17:41 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-04-08 18:58 ` [Bridge] " Stephen Hemminger
2013-04-08 18:58 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-04-09 6:33 ` [Bridge] " Antonio Quartulli
2013-04-09 6:33 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-04-09 7:56 ` [Bridge] " Antonio Quartulli
2013-04-09 7:56 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-04-09 12:57 ` [Bridge] " Jamal Hadi Salim
2013-04-09 12:57 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2013-04-09 13:51 ` [Bridge] " Antonio Quartulli
2013-04-09 13:51 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-04-09 15:49 ` [Bridge] " Jamal Hadi Salim
2013-04-09 15:49 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2013-04-10 16:54 ` [Bridge] " Antonio Quartulli
2013-04-10 16:54 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-04-10 20:46 ` [Bridge] " Stephen Hemminger
2013-04-10 20:46 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-04-11 10:56 ` [Bridge] " Antonio Quartulli
2013-04-11 10:56 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-04-11 11:03 ` Jamal Hadi Salim [this message]
2013-04-11 11:03 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2013-04-08 17:41 ` [Bridge] [PATCH 2/3] sk_buff: add bridge_restricted flag Antonio Quartulli
2013-04-08 17:41 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-04-08 17:41 ` [Bridge] [PATCH 3/3] bridge: implement restricted port forwarding policy Antonio Quartulli
2013-04-08 17:41 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-05-06 18:48 ` Using skb->mark outside netfilter (was: [PATCH 0/3] bridge: implement restricted forwarding policy) Antonio Quartulli
2013-05-07 13:04 ` Using skb->mark outside netfilter Jamal Hadi Salim
2013-05-07 13:23 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-05-07 13:30 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2013-05-07 14:17 ` Antonio Quartulli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5166987B.4030501@mojatatu.com \
--to=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=antonio@open-mesh.com \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.