From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: jacob.shin@amd.com, haitao.shan@intel.com,
jun.nakajima@intel.com, dietmar.hahn@ts.fujitsu.com,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] x86/AMD: Clean up context_update() in AMD VPMU code
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 14:48:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5167137D.6000300@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365528379-2516-9-git-send-email-boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Boris,
I have a couple questions. After patched, here is the final code:
static int amd_vpmu_do_rdmsr(unsigned int msr, uint64_t *msr_content)
{
struct vcpu *v = current;
struct vpmu_struct *vpmu = vcpu_vpmu(v);
if ( vpmu_is_set(vpmu, VPMU_STOPPED) )
{
context_load(v);
vpmu_reset(vpmu, VPMU_STOPPED);
}
if ( !vpmu_is_set(vpmu, VPMU_CONTEXT_LOADED) )
context_read(msr, msr_content);
else
rdmsrl(msr, *msr_content);
return 1;
}
1. Why do you need to call context_load() here since you checking if the
we are in VPMU_CONTEXT_LOADED and get the appropriate copy before
returning the msr_content?
2. If you have already called context_load() above, shouldn't you have
to call "vpmu_set(vpmu, VPMU_CONTEXT_LOADED)" as well? But then, you
wouldn't be needing the latter logic, isn't it?
Suravee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-11 19:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-09 17:26 [PATCH 0/8] Various VPMU patches Boris Ostrovsky
2013-04-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 1/8] x86/AMD: Allow more fine-grained control of VMCB MSR Permission Map Boris Ostrovsky
2013-04-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86/AMD: Do not intercept access to performance counters MSRs Boris Ostrovsky
2013-04-10 13:25 ` Jan Beulich
2013-04-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 3/8] x86/AMD: Read VPMU MSRs from context when it is not loaded into HW Boris Ostrovsky
2013-04-11 18:26 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2013-04-11 18:34 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2013-04-11 19:30 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2013-04-16 15:41 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-04-16 17:12 ` Jacob Shin
2013-04-16 18:36 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-19 22:56 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-06-19 23:32 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2013-06-19 23:53 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2013-04-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86/AMD: Stop counters on VPMU save Boris Ostrovsky
2013-04-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 5/8] x86/VPMU: Add Haswell support Boris Ostrovsky
2013-04-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86/VPMU: Factor out VPMU common code Boris Ostrovsky
2013-04-10 16:03 ` Nakajima, Jun
2013-04-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 7/8] x86/VPMU: Save/restore VPMU only when necessary Boris Ostrovsky
2013-04-10 8:57 ` Dietmar Hahn
2013-04-10 12:53 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2013-04-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86/AMD: Clean up context_update() in AMD VPMU code Boris Ostrovsky
2013-04-11 19:48 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit [this message]
2013-04-11 20:42 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2013-04-10 8:57 ` [PATCH 0/8] Various VPMU patches Dietmar Hahn
2013-04-10 18:49 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-04-10 19:10 ` Boris Ostrovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5167137D.6000300@amd.com \
--to=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=dietmar.hahn@ts.fujitsu.com \
--cc=haitao.shan@intel.com \
--cc=jacob.shin@amd.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.