All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH V2] Add CPUID bit mask for Performance Counter Extension
@ 2013-03-05 23:01 suravee.suthikulpanit
  2013-03-06 22:10 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: suravee.suthikulpanit @ 2013-03-05 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xen-devel, JBeulich; +Cc: Jacob Shin

Adding CPUID bit mask for Performance Counter Extension. The extended 
counter MSRs are already virtualized.  This bit mask allows the initialization 
code to properly detect the feature and enable the use of counters.

Signed-off-by: Jacob Shin <Jacob.Shin@amd.com>
Submitted-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
---
Changelog:
V2:
    * Add commit log message

 tools/libxc/xc_cpufeature.h |    1 +
 tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c  |    1 +
 tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c   |    1 +
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_cpufeature.h b/tools/libxc/xc_cpufeature.h
index c464e3a..c804af3 100644
--- a/tools/libxc/xc_cpufeature.h
+++ b/tools/libxc/xc_cpufeature.h
@@ -125,6 +125,7 @@
 #define X86_FEATURE_NODEID_MSR  19 /* NodeId MSR */
 #define X86_FEATURE_TBM         21 /* trailing bit manipulations */
 #define X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT     22 /* topology extensions CPUID leafs */
+#define X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_CORE 23 /* core performance counter extensions */
 
 /* Intel-defined CPU features, CPUID level 0x00000007:0 (ebx) */
 #define X86_FEATURE_FSGSBASE     0 /* {RD,WR}{FS,GS}BASE instructions */
diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c b/tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c
index 17efc0f..c269468 100644
--- a/tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c
+++ b/tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c
@@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ static void amd_xc_cpuid_policy(
                     bitmaskof(X86_FEATURE_XOP) |
                     bitmaskof(X86_FEATURE_FMA4) |
                     bitmaskof(X86_FEATURE_TBM) |
+                    bitmaskof(X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_CORE) |
                     bitmaskof(X86_FEATURE_LWP));
         regs[3] &= (0x0183f3ff | /* features shared with 0x00000001:EDX */
                     (is_pae ? bitmaskof(X86_FEATURE_NX) : 0) |
diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c
index d17fdd6..f3f1265 100644
--- a/tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c
+++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c
@@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ int libxl_cpuid_parse_config(libxl_cpuid_policy_list *cpuid, const char* str)
         {"vme",          0x00000001, NA, CPUID_REG_EDX,  1,  1},
         {"fpu",          0x00000001, NA, CPUID_REG_EDX,  0,  1},
         {"topoext",      0x80000001, NA, CPUID_REG_ECX, 22,  1},
+        {"perfctr_core", 0x80000001, NA, CPUID_REG_ECX, 23,  1},
         {"tbm",          0x80000001, NA, CPUID_REG_ECX, 21,  1},
         {"nodeid",       0x80000001, NA, CPUID_REG_ECX, 19,  1},
         {"fma4",         0x80000001, NA, CPUID_REG_ECX, 16,  1},
-- 
1.7.10.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] Add CPUID bit mask for Performance Counter Extension
  2013-03-05 23:01 [PATCH V2] Add CPUID bit mask for Performance Counter Extension suravee.suthikulpanit
@ 2013-03-06 22:10 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
  2013-03-25 19:30   ` Suravee Suthikulanit
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk @ 2013-03-06 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: suravee.suthikulpanit; +Cc: Jacob Shin, JBeulich, xen-devel

On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 05:01:26PM -0600, suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com wrote:
> Adding CPUID bit mask for Performance Counter Extension. The extended 
> counter MSRs are already virtualized.  This bit mask allows the initialization 
> code to properly detect the feature and enable the use of counters.

Just to be clear, to make use of this, the guest config has to have

cpuid="perfctr_core"

Is this something that is the same for Intel hardware? Meaning is the
code path in xl the same for enabling performance counters on Intel?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Shin <Jacob.Shin@amd.com>
> Submitted-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
> ---
> Changelog:
> V2:
>     * Add commit log message
> 
>  tools/libxc/xc_cpufeature.h |    1 +
>  tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c  |    1 +
>  tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c   |    1 +
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_cpufeature.h b/tools/libxc/xc_cpufeature.h
> index c464e3a..c804af3 100644
> --- a/tools/libxc/xc_cpufeature.h
> +++ b/tools/libxc/xc_cpufeature.h
> @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@
>  #define X86_FEATURE_NODEID_MSR  19 /* NodeId MSR */
>  #define X86_FEATURE_TBM         21 /* trailing bit manipulations */
>  #define X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT     22 /* topology extensions CPUID leafs */
> +#define X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_CORE 23 /* core performance counter extensions */
>  
>  /* Intel-defined CPU features, CPUID level 0x00000007:0 (ebx) */
>  #define X86_FEATURE_FSGSBASE     0 /* {RD,WR}{FS,GS}BASE instructions */
> diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c b/tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c
> index 17efc0f..c269468 100644
> --- a/tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c
> +++ b/tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c
> @@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ static void amd_xc_cpuid_policy(
>                      bitmaskof(X86_FEATURE_XOP) |
>                      bitmaskof(X86_FEATURE_FMA4) |
>                      bitmaskof(X86_FEATURE_TBM) |
> +                    bitmaskof(X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_CORE) |
>                      bitmaskof(X86_FEATURE_LWP));
>          regs[3] &= (0x0183f3ff | /* features shared with 0x00000001:EDX */
>                      (is_pae ? bitmaskof(X86_FEATURE_NX) : 0) |
> diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c
> index d17fdd6..f3f1265 100644
> --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c
> +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c
> @@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ int libxl_cpuid_parse_config(libxl_cpuid_policy_list *cpuid, const char* str)
>          {"vme",          0x00000001, NA, CPUID_REG_EDX,  1,  1},
>          {"fpu",          0x00000001, NA, CPUID_REG_EDX,  0,  1},
>          {"topoext",      0x80000001, NA, CPUID_REG_ECX, 22,  1},
> +        {"perfctr_core", 0x80000001, NA, CPUID_REG_ECX, 23,  1},
>          {"tbm",          0x80000001, NA, CPUID_REG_ECX, 21,  1},
>          {"nodeid",       0x80000001, NA, CPUID_REG_ECX, 19,  1},
>          {"fma4",         0x80000001, NA, CPUID_REG_ECX, 16,  1},
> -- 
> 1.7.10.4
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] Add CPUID bit mask for Performance Counter Extension
  2013-03-06 22:10 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
@ 2013-03-25 19:30   ` Suravee Suthikulanit
  2013-04-11 20:24     ` Suravee Suthikulanit
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Suravee Suthikulanit @ 2013-03-25 19:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk; +Cc: Jacob Shin, JBeulich, xen-devel

Sorry.  I missed this email from the mailing list thread.  Please see my 
answer below.

On 3/6/2013 4:10 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 05:01:26PM -0600, suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com wrote:
>> Adding CPUID bit mask for Performance Counter Extension. The extended
>> counter MSRs are already virtualized.  This bit mask allows the initialization
>> code to properly detect the feature and enable the use of counters.
> Just to be clear, to make use of this, the guest config has to have
>
> cpuid="perfctr_core"
Guest should not need to config anything.  The patch allows the host's 
CPUID bit to be passed on to guest.  However, users can also force the 
CPUID bits to set/clear by specifying:

cpuid = "host,perfctr_core=0"

>
> Is this something that is the same for Intel hardware? Meaning is the
> code path in xl the same for enabling performance counters on Intel?
This is AMD specific CPUID flag, and therefore is specified in the 
"amd_xc_cpuid_policy".

Suravee.

>
>> Signed-off-by: Jacob Shin <Jacob.Shin@amd.com>
>> Submitted-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
>> ---
>> Changelog:
>> V2:
>>      * Add commit log message
>>
>>   tools/libxc/xc_cpufeature.h |    1 +
>>   tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c  |    1 +
>>   tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c   |    1 +
>>   3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_cpufeature.h b/tools/libxc/xc_cpufeature.h
>> index c464e3a..c804af3 100644
>> --- a/tools/libxc/xc_cpufeature.h
>> +++ b/tools/libxc/xc_cpufeature.h
>> @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@
>>   #define X86_FEATURE_NODEID_MSR  19 /* NodeId MSR */
>>   #define X86_FEATURE_TBM         21 /* trailing bit manipulations */
>>   #define X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT     22 /* topology extensions CPUID leafs */
>> +#define X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_CORE 23 /* core performance counter extensions */
>>   
>>   /* Intel-defined CPU features, CPUID level 0x00000007:0 (ebx) */
>>   #define X86_FEATURE_FSGSBASE     0 /* {RD,WR}{FS,GS}BASE instructions */
>> diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c b/tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c
>> index 17efc0f..c269468 100644
>> --- a/tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c
>> +++ b/tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c
>> @@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ static void amd_xc_cpuid_policy(
>>                       bitmaskof(X86_FEATURE_XOP) |
>>                       bitmaskof(X86_FEATURE_FMA4) |
>>                       bitmaskof(X86_FEATURE_TBM) |
>> +                    bitmaskof(X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_CORE) |
>>                       bitmaskof(X86_FEATURE_LWP));
>>           regs[3] &= (0x0183f3ff | /* features shared with 0x00000001:EDX */
>>                       (is_pae ? bitmaskof(X86_FEATURE_NX) : 0) |
>> diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c
>> index d17fdd6..f3f1265 100644
>> --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c
>> +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c
>> @@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ int libxl_cpuid_parse_config(libxl_cpuid_policy_list *cpuid, const char* str)
>>           {"vme",          0x00000001, NA, CPUID_REG_EDX,  1,  1},
>>           {"fpu",          0x00000001, NA, CPUID_REG_EDX,  0,  1},
>>           {"topoext",      0x80000001, NA, CPUID_REG_ECX, 22,  1},
>> +        {"perfctr_core", 0x80000001, NA, CPUID_REG_ECX, 23,  1},
>>           {"tbm",          0x80000001, NA, CPUID_REG_ECX, 21,  1},
>>           {"nodeid",       0x80000001, NA, CPUID_REG_ECX, 19,  1},
>>           {"fma4",         0x80000001, NA, CPUID_REG_ECX, 16,  1},
>> -- 
>> 1.7.10.4
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
>> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] Add CPUID bit mask for Performance Counter Extension
  2013-03-25 19:30   ` Suravee Suthikulanit
@ 2013-04-11 20:24     ` Suravee Suthikulanit
  2013-04-21  1:13       ` Matt Wilson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Suravee Suthikulanit @ 2013-04-11 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, Boris Ostrovsky; +Cc: Jacob Shin, JBeulich, xen-devel

Is there any other concerns about this patch?

Thanks,

Suravee

On 3/25/2013 2:30 PM, Suravee Suthikulanit wrote:
> Sorry. I missed this email from the mailing list thread.  Please see 
> my answer below.
>
> On 3/6/2013 4:10 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 05:01:26PM -0600, 
>> suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com wrote:
>>> Adding CPUID bit mask for Performance Counter Extension. The extended
>>> counter MSRs are already virtualized.  This bit mask allows the 
>>> initialization
>>> code to properly detect the feature and enable the use of counters.
>> Just to be clear, to make use of this, the guest config has to have
>>
>> cpuid="perfctr_core"
> Guest should not need to config anything.  The patch allows the host's 
> CPUID bit to be passed on to guest.  However, users can also force the 
> CPUID bits to set/clear by specifying:
>
> cpuid = "host,perfctr_core=0"
>
>>
>> Is this something that is the same for Intel hardware? Meaning is the
>> code path in xl the same for enabling performance counters on Intel?
> This is AMD specific CPUID flag, and therefore is specified in the 
> "amd_xc_cpuid_policy".
>
> Suravee.
>
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jacob Shin <Jacob.Shin@amd.com>
>>> Submitted-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changelog:
>>> V2:
>>>      * Add commit log message
>>>
>>>   tools/libxc/xc_cpufeature.h |    1 +
>>>   tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c  |    1 +
>>>   tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c   |    1 +
>>>   3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_cpufeature.h b/tools/libxc/xc_cpufeature.h
>>> index c464e3a..c804af3 100644
>>> --- a/tools/libxc/xc_cpufeature.h
>>> +++ b/tools/libxc/xc_cpufeature.h
>>> @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@
>>>   #define X86_FEATURE_NODEID_MSR  19 /* NodeId MSR */
>>>   #define X86_FEATURE_TBM         21 /* trailing bit manipulations */
>>>   #define X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT     22 /* topology extensions CPUID 
>>> leafs */
>>> +#define X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_CORE 23 /* core performance counter 
>>> extensions */
>>>     /* Intel-defined CPU features, CPUID level 0x00000007:0 (ebx) */
>>>   #define X86_FEATURE_FSGSBASE     0 /* {RD,WR}{FS,GS}BASE 
>>> instructions */
>>> diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c b/tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c
>>> index 17efc0f..c269468 100644
>>> --- a/tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c
>>> +++ b/tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c
>>> @@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ static void amd_xc_cpuid_policy(
>>>                       bitmaskof(X86_FEATURE_XOP) |
>>>                       bitmaskof(X86_FEATURE_FMA4) |
>>>                       bitmaskof(X86_FEATURE_TBM) |
>>> +                    bitmaskof(X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_CORE) |
>>>                       bitmaskof(X86_FEATURE_LWP));
>>>           regs[3] &= (0x0183f3ff | /* features shared with 
>>> 0x00000001:EDX */
>>>                       (is_pae ? bitmaskof(X86_FEATURE_NX) : 0) |
>>> diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c
>>> index d17fdd6..f3f1265 100644
>>> --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c
>>> +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c
>>> @@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ int 
>>> libxl_cpuid_parse_config(libxl_cpuid_policy_list *cpuid, const char* 
>>> str)
>>>           {"vme",          0x00000001, NA, CPUID_REG_EDX,  1, 1},
>>>           {"fpu",          0x00000001, NA, CPUID_REG_EDX,  0, 1},
>>>           {"topoext",      0x80000001, NA, CPUID_REG_ECX, 22, 1},
>>> +        {"perfctr_core", 0x80000001, NA, CPUID_REG_ECX, 23, 1},
>>>           {"tbm",          0x80000001, NA, CPUID_REG_ECX, 21, 1},
>>>           {"nodeid",       0x80000001, NA, CPUID_REG_ECX, 19, 1},
>>>           {"fma4",         0x80000001, NA, CPUID_REG_ECX, 16, 1},
>>> -- 
>>> 1.7.10.4
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
>>> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] Add CPUID bit mask for Performance Counter Extension
  2013-04-11 20:24     ` Suravee Suthikulanit
@ 2013-04-21  1:13       ` Matt Wilson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Matt Wilson @ 2013-04-21  1:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Suravee Suthikulanit
  Cc: Boris Ostrovsky, xen-devel, Jacob Shin, JBeulich,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 03:24:31PM -0500, Suravee Suthikulanit wrote:
> Is there any other concerns about this patch?

This makes sense to me.

Acked-by: Matt Wilson <msw@amazon.com>
 
> On 3/25/2013 2:30 PM, Suravee Suthikulanit wrote:
> >Sorry. I missed this email from the mailing list thread.  Please
> >see my answer below.
> >
> >On 3/6/2013 4:10 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >>On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 05:01:26PM -0600,
> >>suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com wrote:
> >>>Adding CPUID bit mask for Performance Counter Extension. The extended
> >>>counter MSRs are already virtualized.  This bit mask allows
> >>>the initialization
> >>>code to properly detect the feature and enable the use of counters.
> >>Just to be clear, to make use of this, the guest config has to have
> >>
> >>cpuid="perfctr_core"
> >Guest should not need to config anything.  The patch allows the
> >host's CPUID bit to be passed on to guest.  However, users can
> >also force the CPUID bits to set/clear by specifying:
> >
> >cpuid = "host,perfctr_core=0"
> >
> >>
> >>Is this something that is the same for Intel hardware? Meaning is the
> >>code path in xl the same for enabling performance counters on Intel?
> >This is AMD specific CPUID flag, and therefore is specified in the
> >"amd_xc_cpuid_policy".
> >
> >Suravee.
> >
> >>
> >>>Signed-off-by: Jacob Shin <Jacob.Shin@amd.com>
> >>>Submitted-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
> >>>---
> >>>Changelog:
> >>>V2:
> >>>     * Add commit log message
> >>>
> >>>  tools/libxc/xc_cpufeature.h |    1 +
> >>>  tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c  |    1 +
> >>>  tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c   |    1 +
> >>>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>>diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_cpufeature.h b/tools/libxc/xc_cpufeature.h
> >>>index c464e3a..c804af3 100644
> >>>--- a/tools/libxc/xc_cpufeature.h
> >>>+++ b/tools/libxc/xc_cpufeature.h
> >>>@@ -125,6 +125,7 @@
> >>>  #define X86_FEATURE_NODEID_MSR  19 /* NodeId MSR */
> >>>  #define X86_FEATURE_TBM         21 /* trailing bit manipulations */
> >>>  #define X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT     22 /* topology extensions
> >>>CPUID leafs */
> >>>+#define X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_CORE 23 /* core performance
> >>>counter extensions */
> >>>    /* Intel-defined CPU features, CPUID level 0x00000007:0 (ebx) */
> >>>  #define X86_FEATURE_FSGSBASE     0 /* {RD,WR}{FS,GS}BASE
> >>>instructions */
> >>>diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c b/tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c
> >>>index 17efc0f..c269468 100644
> >>>--- a/tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c
> >>>+++ b/tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c
> >>>@@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ static void amd_xc_cpuid_policy(
> >>>                      bitmaskof(X86_FEATURE_XOP) |
> >>>                      bitmaskof(X86_FEATURE_FMA4) |
> >>>                      bitmaskof(X86_FEATURE_TBM) |
> >>>+                    bitmaskof(X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_CORE) |
> >>>                      bitmaskof(X86_FEATURE_LWP));
> >>>          regs[3] &= (0x0183f3ff | /* features shared with
> >>>0x00000001:EDX */
> >>>                      (is_pae ? bitmaskof(X86_FEATURE_NX) : 0) |
> >>>diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c
> >>>index d17fdd6..f3f1265 100644
> >>>--- a/tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c
> >>>+++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c
> >>>@@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ int
> >>>libxl_cpuid_parse_config(libxl_cpuid_policy_list *cpuid, const
> >>>char* str)
> >>>          {"vme",          0x00000001, NA, CPUID_REG_EDX,  1, 1},
> >>>          {"fpu",          0x00000001, NA, CPUID_REG_EDX,  0, 1},
> >>>          {"topoext",      0x80000001, NA, CPUID_REG_ECX, 22, 1},
> >>>+        {"perfctr_core", 0x80000001, NA, CPUID_REG_ECX, 23, 1},
> >>>          {"tbm",          0x80000001, NA, CPUID_REG_ECX, 21, 1},
> >>>          {"nodeid",       0x80000001, NA, CPUID_REG_ECX, 19, 1},
> >>>          {"fma4",         0x80000001, NA, CPUID_REG_ECX, 16, 1},
> >>>-- 
> >>>1.7.10.4
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>Xen-devel mailing list
> >>>Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> >>>http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Xen-devel mailing list
> >Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> >http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
> >
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-04-21  1:13 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-03-05 23:01 [PATCH V2] Add CPUID bit mask for Performance Counter Extension suravee.suthikulpanit
2013-03-06 22:10 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-03-25 19:30   ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-04-11 20:24     ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-04-21  1:13       ` Matt Wilson

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.