From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
RT <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Clark Williams <clark@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RT LATENCY] 249 microsecond latency caused by slub's unfreeze_partials() code.
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:48:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5167AE42.1040308@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0000013df9f9ca28-9863f810-f95f-4a21-83cd-a7a875af69c8-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Hello,
On 04/11/2013 07:42 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2013, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
>> I was wondering if you made any more forward progress with with patch
>> yet. When it goes into mainline, I'd like to backport it to the -rt
>> stable trees, and will probably make it enabled by default when
>> PREEMPT_RT is enabled.
>
> Sorry I did not get around to it yet. Also waiting for Joonsoo's patch to
> be merged first. Which tree may I use Pekka?
https://github.com/penberg/linux/commits/slab/next
and
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/penberg/linux.git/log/?h=slab/next
are the same and include what I've queued for 3.10.
I'm waiting for a new version of Joonsoon's patch to appear.
Pekka
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
RT <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Clark Williams <clark@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RT LATENCY] 249 microsecond latency caused by slub's unfreeze_partials() code.
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:48:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5167AE42.1040308@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0000013df9f9ca28-9863f810-f95f-4a21-83cd-a7a875af69c8-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Hello,
On 04/11/2013 07:42 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2013, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
>> I was wondering if you made any more forward progress with with patch
>> yet. When it goes into mainline, I'd like to backport it to the -rt
>> stable trees, and will probably make it enabled by default when
>> PREEMPT_RT is enabled.
>
> Sorry I did not get around to it yet. Also waiting for Joonsoo's patch to
> be merged first. Which tree may I use Pekka?
https://github.com/penberg/linux/commits/slab/next
and
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/penberg/linux.git/log/?h=slab/next
are the same and include what I've queued for 3.10.
I'm waiting for a new version of Joonsoon's patch to appear.
Pekka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-12 6:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-21 22:55 [RT LATENCY] 249 microsecond latency caused by slub's unfreeze_partials() code Steven Rostedt
2013-03-22 15:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-03-23 3:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-03-25 14:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-03-25 15:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-03-25 16:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-03-25 17:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-03-25 18:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-03-25 18:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-03-25 18:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-03-27 2:59 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-27 3:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-03-27 6:13 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-28 17:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-04-08 12:25 ` Steven Rostedt
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1303281227520.16200@gentwo.org>
2013-03-28 17:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-03-29 2:43 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-04-01 15:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-04-01 16:06 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-04-01 16:06 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-04-02 0:07 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-04-01 21:46 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-04-01 21:46 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-04-02 1:37 ` Joonsoo Kim
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1304011025550.12690@gentwo.org>
2013-04-01 15:33 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-04-02 0:42 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-02 6:48 ` Pekka Enberg
2013-04-02 19:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-04-04 0:58 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-04 13:53 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-04-05 2:05 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-05 14:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-04-08 12:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-04-10 6:31 ` Pekka Enberg
2013-04-10 7:31 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-10 14:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-04-10 14:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-04-11 16:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-04-11 16:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-04-12 6:48 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2013-04-12 6:48 ` Pekka Enberg
2013-05-28 14:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-05-28 16:22 ` Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1305281121420.1627@gentwo.org>
2013-05-28 18:24 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-06-03 15:28 ` JoonSoo Kim
2013-06-03 19:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-06-04 22:21 ` JoonSoo Kim
2013-06-05 14:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-06-05 14:09 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-06-03 20:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-03-26 16:52 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5167AE42.1040308@kernel.org \
--to=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=clark@redhat.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.