From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Cc: plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, linux@maxim.org.za,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rjw@sisk.pl,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 2/2] ARM: at91: cpuidle: move the driver to drivers/cpuidle directory
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:29:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <516C0EAE.10804@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <516C0B30.501@atmel.com>
On 04/15/2013 04:14 PM, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> On 04/15/2013 03:29 PM, Daniel Lezcano :
>> We don't have any dependency with the SoC specific code.
>>
>> Move the driver to the drivers/cpuidle directory.
>>
>> Add Nicolas Ferre as author of the driver, so it will be in copy of the emails.
>
> Unfortunately, I am not the author of this driver. It is the work of
> Albin Tonnerre <albin.tonnerre@free-electrons.com>. So, for sure, I (and
> Jean-Christohpe) can babysit this code but I cannot be awarded for it...
> You can certainly add to the header of this file:
> Maintained by the AT91 crew: Nicolas Ferre, Jean-Christophe
> Plagniol-Villard (together with email addresses).
Ok, will do.
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile | 1 -
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c | 55 ----------------------------------------
>> drivers/cpuidle/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/cpuidle/at91.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> No, sorry this file name is not appropriate: I prefer cpuidle-at91.c
Sure ? :)
It is a bit redundant drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-at91.c, no ? and if all
the cpuidle drivers are there, the directory content will look:
cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra114.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra20.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra30.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-imx5.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-imx6.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-kirkwood.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-calxeda.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-shmobile.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-intel-idle.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-at91.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-omap34xx.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-omap44xx.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-ux500.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-exynos4.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-acpi.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-pseries.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-sh.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-s3c64xx.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-davinci.c
etc ...
But I won't argue if you really want cpuidle-at91.c, it is a detail IMO.
Thanks
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC patch 2/2] ARM: at91: cpuidle: move the driver to drivers/cpuidle directory
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:29:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <516C0EAE.10804@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <516C0B30.501@atmel.com>
On 04/15/2013 04:14 PM, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> On 04/15/2013 03:29 PM, Daniel Lezcano :
>> We don't have any dependency with the SoC specific code.
>>
>> Move the driver to the drivers/cpuidle directory.
>>
>> Add Nicolas Ferre as author of the driver, so it will be in copy of the emails.
>
> Unfortunately, I am not the author of this driver. It is the work of
> Albin Tonnerre <albin.tonnerre@free-electrons.com>. So, for sure, I (and
> Jean-Christohpe) can babysit this code but I cannot be awarded for it...
> You can certainly add to the header of this file:
> Maintained by the AT91 crew: Nicolas Ferre, Jean-Christophe
> Plagniol-Villard (together with email addresses).
Ok, will do.
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile | 1 -
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c | 55 ----------------------------------------
>> drivers/cpuidle/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/cpuidle/at91.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> No, sorry this file name is not appropriate: I prefer cpuidle-at91.c
Sure ? :)
It is a bit redundant drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-at91.c, no ? and if all
the cpuidle drivers are there, the directory content will look:
cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra114.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra20.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra30.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-imx5.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-imx6.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-kirkwood.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-calxeda.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-shmobile.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-intel-idle.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-at91.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-omap34xx.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-omap44xx.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-ux500.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-exynos4.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-acpi.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-pseries.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-sh.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-s3c64xx.c
cpuidle/cpuidle-davinci.c
etc ...
But I won't argue if you really want cpuidle-at91.c, it is a detail IMO.
Thanks
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-15 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-15 13:29 [RFC patch 0/2] ARM: at91: cpuidle: move driver to drivers/cpuidle Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-15 13:29 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-15 13:29 ` [RFC patch 1/2] ARM: at91: cpuidle: encapsulate the standby code Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-15 13:29 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-15 13:54 ` Nicolas Ferre
2013-04-15 13:54 ` Nicolas Ferre
2013-04-15 14:13 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-15 14:13 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-15 14:17 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-04-15 14:17 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-04-15 13:29 ` [RFC patch 2/2] ARM: at91: cpuidle: move the driver to drivers/cpuidle directory Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-15 13:29 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-15 14:14 ` Nicolas Ferre
2013-04-15 14:14 ` Nicolas Ferre
2013-04-15 14:29 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2013-04-15 14:29 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-15 14:20 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-04-15 14:20 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-04-15 14:37 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-15 14:37 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-15 16:00 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-04-15 16:00 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-04-16 22:39 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-04-16 22:39 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-06-21 10:51 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-06-21 10:51 ` Daniel Lezcano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=516C0EAE.10804@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@maxim.org.za \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.