From: Jeremy Linton <jlinton@tributary.com>
To: "emilne@redhat.com" <emilne@redhat.com>,
Linux Scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] [SCSI] Enhanced sense and Unit Attention handling
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:20:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <516C28DB.2090809@tributary.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1366035182.30762.14.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On 4/15/2013 9:13 AM, Ewan Milne wrote:
>> patch could attempt to clear the check conditions from LUNs that share
>> the I_T.
>
> I think the mid-layer will handle that automatically. If check conditions
> are reported the commands will have to be reissued.
But, not automatically (unless i'm missing something again). The UA is going to
arrive when each lun gets sent a command, which could be a long time from the
initial UA if the lun is idle. Enough time, that the attempts to coalesce the
events are going to fail.
I guess it depends on what you have udev doing when it gets the event. If it
triggers a rescan involving something besides inquiry/report luns then that will
trigger the remaining UA's from the luns on the target that changed. But if it
does something other than that, I don't see it by reading the
patch/scsi_scan.c code.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-15 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-01 17:53 [PATCH v2 0/8] [SCSI] Enhanced sense and Unit Attention handling Ewan D. Milne
2013-02-01 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] [SCSI] Generate uevent on sd capacity change Ewan D. Milne
2013-02-01 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] [SCSI] Add a kernel config option for enhanced Unit Attention support Ewan D. Milne
2013-02-01 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] [SCSI] Rename scsi_evt_xxx to sdev_evt_xxx and scsi_event to sdev_event Ewan D. Milne
2013-02-01 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] [SCSI] Add support for scsi_target events Ewan D. Milne
2013-02-01 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] [SCSI] Generate uevents for certain Unit Attention codes Ewan D. Milne
2013-02-01 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] [SCSI] Add sysfs support for enhanced Unit Attention handling Ewan D. Milne
2013-02-01 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] [SCSI] Add sense and Unit Attention generation to scsi_debug Ewan D. Milne
2013-02-01 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] [SCSI] Streamline detection of FM/EOM/ILI status Ewan D. Milne
2013-04-11 21:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] [SCSI] Enhanced sense and Unit Attention handling Jeremy Linton
2013-04-15 14:13 ` Ewan Milne
2013-04-15 16:20 ` Jeremy Linton [this message]
2013-04-15 16:51 ` Ewan Milne
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=516C28DB.2090809@tributary.com \
--to=jlinton@tributary.com \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.