Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Add posted interrupt supporting

[George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>]

On 18/04/13 01:19, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> Keir Fraser wrote on 2013-04-18:
>> On 17/04/2013 13:53, "George Dunlap" <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 17/04/2013 07:50, "Yang Zhang" <yang.z.zhang@intel.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> From: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@Intel.com>
>>>> The whole series:
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
>>> Keir / Yang, any comments on risks to the release?
>>>
>>> Yang, what kinds of testing are you guys going to be doing of this
>>> between now and the 4.3 release?
>>>
>>>  From a feature / risk of slip perspective, I think this is probably
>>> good.  The key thing I think is making sure that if there is a bug, it
>>> will be caught before the release.  I suspect that a lot of people
>>> won't have hardware to test this, so it will be up to Intel to make
>>> sure the code has "gone through its paces" and is ready for public
>>> consumption in 2 months' time.
>> Personally I think it should go in, if Intel can assure they have done
>> decent testing internally (and will continue to do so).
> Yes, we did many testing: beside our regular testing, we also did some stress testing(boot guest and scp large file continually). And we didn't see any issue.
> Also, we will put APICv testing into our nightly testing system to make sure it works well.

Sounds good.  So from a release perspective:

Acked-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>