All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@ti.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] net/cpsw: don't continue if we miss to allocate rx skbs
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 14:09:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <516FE26C.5040601@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <516FDDEE.6030906@ti.com>

On 04/18/2013 01:50 PM, Mugunthan V N wrote:

>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> index e2ba702..3b22a36 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> @@ -912,14 +912,16 @@ static int cpsw_ndo_open(struct net_device *ndev)
>>               struct sk_buff *skb;
>>                 ret = -ENOMEM;
>> -            skb = netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(priv->ndev,
>> -                            priv->rx_packet_max);
>> +            skb = __netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(priv->ndev,
>> +                    priv->rx_packet_max, GFP_KERNEL);
>>               if (!skb)
>> -                break;
>> +                goto err_cleanup;
>>               ret = cpdma_chan_submit(priv->rxch, skb, skb->data,
>>                       skb_tailroom(skb), 0, GFP_KERNEL);
>> -            if (WARN_ON(ret < 0))
>> -                break;
>> +            if (ret < 0) {
>> +                kfree_skb(skb);
>> +                goto err_cleanup;
> Why you need to close the device even you have some skb allocated and
> submitted successfully. Can allow the device to continue with lower
> performance

Because this should not happen. If you run out-of-memory because an
application is going crazy than you won't have much anyway. If you
configured too much skbs then this should be fixed as well.

>> +            }
>>           }
>>           /* continue even if we didn't manage to submit all
>>            * receive descs
>> @@ -944,6 +946,10 @@ static int cpsw_ndo_open(struct net_device *ndev)
>>       if (priv->data.dual_emac)
>>           priv->slaves[priv->emac_port].open_stat = true;
>>       return 0;
>> +
>> +err_cleanup:
>> +    cpdma_ctlr_stop(priv->dma);
>> +    return ret;
>>   }
> only cpdma is halted and allocated skb are released, need to have other
> calls like pm_runtime_put_sync, close host and slave ports

Okay, will fix.

> 
> Regards
> Mugunthan V N


Sebastian

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-18 12:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-17 21:52 my small cpsw queue Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-17 21:52 ` [PATCH 1/5] net/davinci_cpdma: don't check for jiffies with interrupts Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-18 11:49   ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-17 21:52 ` [PATCH 2/5] net/cpsw: don't continue if we miss to allocate rx skbs Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-18 11:50   ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-18 12:09     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2013-04-19 10:40       ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-22  8:05         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-17 21:52 ` [PATCH 3/5] net/cpsw: don't rely on netif_running() to check which device is active Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-18 11:50   ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-18 12:10     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-19 10:35       ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-22  8:30         ` [PATCH 3/5 v2] net/cpsw: don't rely only " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-22  9:14           ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-22  9:30             ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-22  9:40               ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-22  9:49                 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-22 10:12                   ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-22 10:19                     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-22 19:21           ` David Miller
2013-04-19 13:10   ` [PATCH 3/5] net/cpsw: don't rely " Sergei Shtylyov
2013-04-22  8:33     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-17 21:52 ` [PATCH 4/5] net/davinci_cpdma: remove unused argument in cpdma_chan_submit() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-18 11:51   ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-17 21:52 ` [PATCH 5/5] net/cpsw: redo rx skb allocation in rx path Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-18 11:50   ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-18 12:13     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-19 10:28       ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-18 14:59     ` Eric Dumazet
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-04-23 17:31 cpsw queue, v2 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-23 17:31 ` [PATCH 2/5] net/cpsw: don't continue if we miss to allocate rx skbs Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-23 17:41   ` Mugunthan V N

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=516FE26C.5040601@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=mugunthanvnm@ti.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.