From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>,
"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
LKP ML <lkp@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: bltk-game regressions on snb laptop
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 18:00:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <517115D4.5020505@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpo=NGYadRubvBDLsE=oO1wuDSxnutYfZLm9vu4B6tcUw-g@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/18/2013 06:01 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 18 April 2013 14:24, Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> wrote:
>> On 04/18/2013 01:37 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>>>> About your system: Can you give output of cpufreq-info for v3.8 and
>>>>>>> v3.9-latestrc?
>>>>>>> Your cpus share a clock line or not?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes our cpu shares a clock line. So the cpufreq-info is same. SNB CPU
>>>>> p-state is per cpu package, and hardware will coordinate the software
>>>>> asking, then decide which cpufreq should be.
>>> Can you paste cpufreq-info output, that will give us a better picture of your
>>> system.
>>>
>>
>> at the most of time with your patch cpufreq-info is 0.8GHz, without the
>> patch, the cpufreq is varied from 1.0 to 2.8 Ghz.
>
> I need full output of following command:
>
> $ cpufreq-info
Sorry for replay late.
the following is cpufreq-info output at 3.9-rc4:
During bltk-game testing, most of time the cpu freq is 2.2G
============
[root@lkp-sb01 cpufreq]#cpupower frequency-info
analyzing CPU 0:
driver: acpi-cpufreq
CPUs which run at the same hardware frequency: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
CPUs which need to have their frequency coordinated by software: 0 1 2
3 4 5 6 7
maximum transition latency: 10.0 us.
hardware limits: 800 MHz - 2.20 GHz
available frequency steps: 2.20 GHz, 2.20 GHz, 2.00 GHz, 1.90 GHz,
1.80 GHz, 1.70 GHz, 1.60 GHz, 1.50 GHz, 1.40 GHz, 1.30 GHz, 1.20 GHz,
1.10 GHz, 1000 MHz, 900 MHz, 800 MHz
available cpufreq governors: ondemand, userspace, performance
current policy: frequency should be within 800 MHz and 2.20 GHz.
The governor "ondemand" may decide which speed to use
within this range.
current CPU frequency is 2.20 GHz (asserted by call to hardware).
boost state support:
Supported: no
Active: no
And this is the 3.9-rc5 kernel, with your patch:
During testing, most of time cpufreq is 0.8Ghz
============
[root@lkp-sb01 ~]#cpupower frequency-info
analyzing CPU 0:
driver: acpi-cpufreq
CPUs which run at the same hardware frequency: 0
CPUs which need to have their frequency coordinated by software: 0
maximum transition latency: 10.0 us.
hardware limits: 800 MHz - 2.20 GHz
available frequency steps: 2.20 GHz, 2.20 GHz, 2.00 GHz, 1.90 GHz,
1.80 GHz, 1.70 GHz, 1.60 GHz, 1.50 GHz, 1.40 GHz, 1.30 GHz, 1.20 GHz,
1.10 GHz, 1000 MHz, 900 MHz, 800 MHz
available cpufreq governors: ondemand, userspace, performance
current policy: frequency should be within 800 MHz and 2.20 GHz.
The governor "ondemand" may decide which speed to use
within this range.
current CPU frequency is 800 MHz (asserted by call to hardware).
boost state support:
Supported: no
Active: no
>
> This has got lots of other details too.
>
--
Thanks
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-19 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-16 7:14 bltk-game regressions on snb laptop Alex Shi
2013-04-17 16:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-18 0:23 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-17 16:46 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-18 0:48 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-18 4:26 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-18 4:36 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-18 5:24 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-18 5:16 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-18 5:37 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-18 6:16 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-18 8:54 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-18 10:01 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-19 10:00 ` Alex Shi [this message]
2013-04-19 12:23 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-19 14:43 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-19 15:44 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=517115D4.5020505@intel.com \
--to=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.