From: Daiane Angolini <daiane.angolini@freescale.com>
To: "Eric Bénard" <eric@eukrea.com>
Cc: meta-freescale Mailing List <meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org>,
Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm PATCH v2 3/3] linux-fslc: Refactor to use linux-imx.inc and avoid duplication of code
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 08:26:01 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <517129C9.8040100@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130419100345.5d522189@e6520eb>
On 04/19/2013 05:03 AM, Eric Bénard wrote:
> Le Thu, 18 Apr 2013 20:46:48 -0300,
> Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Otavio Salvador
>> <otavio@ossystems.com.br> wrote:
>>
>>> Usually kernel would do the right thing but not in our case. Some
>>
>> I don't understand. Why 'usually'? In what sense is our case different?
>>
> maybe most defconfig support only one machine when those in
> meta-fsl-arm support several machines sometimes with different LOADADDR
> requirements and thus need the precision to get a working kernel on a
> specific platform at compile time.
I'm OK to accept the meta-fsl-arm workaround for this LOADADDR error. At
least until we figure out a better way to properly fix that.
Otavio, what do you think about adding KERNEL_EXTRA_ARGS +=
"LOADADDR=${UBOOT_ENTRYPOINT}" in mxc-base.inc and mxs-base.inc instead?
Daiane
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-19 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-18 18:59 [meta-fsl-arm PATCH v2 1/3] u-boot-fslc: Update to patches-2013.04's 20130415 snapshot based on 2013.04-rc3 Otavio Salvador
2013-04-18 18:59 ` [meta-fsl-arm PATCH v2 2/3] linux-imx.inc: Pass LOADADDRESS to kernel build Otavio Salvador
2013-04-18 18:59 ` [meta-fsl-arm PATCH v2 3/3] linux-fslc: Refactor to use linux-imx.inc and avoid duplication of code Otavio Salvador
2013-04-18 19:51 ` Daiane Angolini
2013-04-18 19:58 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-04-18 23:46 ` Fabio Estevam
2013-04-19 8:03 ` Eric Bénard
2013-04-19 11:26 ` Daiane Angolini [this message]
2013-04-19 12:01 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-04-19 12:26 ` Fabio Estevam
2013-04-19 12:36 ` Eric Bénard
2013-04-19 12:38 ` Daiane Angolini
2013-04-19 12:41 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-04-19 13:25 ` Daiane Angolini
2013-04-19 13:33 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-04-19 13:45 ` Daiane Angolini
2013-04-19 13:47 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-04-19 12:36 ` Daiane Angolini
2013-04-19 12:38 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-04-19 11:23 ` Daiane Angolini
2013-04-19 12:00 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-04-19 12:10 ` Eric Bénard
2013-04-19 12:34 ` Daiane Angolini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=517129C9.8040100@freescale.com \
--to=daiane.angolini@freescale.com \
--cc=eric@eukrea.com \
--cc=meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org \
--cc=otavio@ossystems.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.