From: Li Zefan <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Containers
<containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>,
Glauber Costa <glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: [PATCH 00/10] cpuset: implement sane hierarchy behaviors
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 20:25:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <517137A7.4020605@huawei.com> (raw)
Currently some cpuset behaviors are not friendly when cpuset is co-mounted
with other cgroup controllers.
Now with this patchset if cpuset is mounted with sane_behavior option, it
behaves differently:
- Tasks will be kept in empty cpusets when hotplug happens and take masks
of ancestors with non-empty cpus/mems, instead of being moved to an ancestor.
- A task can be moved into an empty cpuset, and again it takes masks of
ancestors, so we drop a task into a newly created cgroup without the user
having to do anything for it.
As tasks can reside in empy cpusets, here're some rules:
- They can be moved to another cpuset, regardless it's empty or not.
- Though it takes masks from ancestors, it takes other configs from the
empty cpuset.
- If the ancestors' masks are changed, those tasks will also be updated
to take new masks.
The first 6 patches are actually cleanups which can be applied no matter
if the last 4 patches are acceptable or not.
Li Zefan (10):
cpuset: remove redundant check in cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback()
cpuset: cleanup guarantee_online_{cpus|mems}()
cpuset: remove unnecessary variable in cpuset_attach()
cpuset: remove cpuset_test_cpumask()
cpuset: don't update tasks' cpumask and nodemask in an empty cpuset
cpuset: re-structure update_cpumask() a bit
cpuset: record old_mems_allowed in struct cpuset
cpuset: introduce effective_{cpumask|nodemask}_cpuset()
cpuset: allow to keep tasks in empty cpusets
cpuset: allow to move tasks to empty cpusets
--
kernel/cpuset.c | 363 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 262 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Subject: [PATCH 00/10] cpuset: implement sane hierarchy behaviors
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 20:25:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <517137A7.4020605@huawei.com> (raw)
Currently some cpuset behaviors are not friendly when cpuset is co-mounted
with other cgroup controllers.
Now with this patchset if cpuset is mounted with sane_behavior option, it
behaves differently:
- Tasks will be kept in empty cpusets when hotplug happens and take masks
of ancestors with non-empty cpus/mems, instead of being moved to an ancestor.
- A task can be moved into an empty cpuset, and again it takes masks of
ancestors, so we drop a task into a newly created cgroup without the user
having to do anything for it.
As tasks can reside in empy cpusets, here're some rules:
- They can be moved to another cpuset, regardless it's empty or not.
- Though it takes masks from ancestors, it takes other configs from the
empty cpuset.
- If the ancestors' masks are changed, those tasks will also be updated
to take new masks.
The first 6 patches are actually cleanups which can be applied no matter
if the last 4 patches are acceptable or not.
Li Zefan (10):
cpuset: remove redundant check in cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback()
cpuset: cleanup guarantee_online_{cpus|mems}()
cpuset: remove unnecessary variable in cpuset_attach()
cpuset: remove cpuset_test_cpumask()
cpuset: don't update tasks' cpumask and nodemask in an empty cpuset
cpuset: re-structure update_cpumask() a bit
cpuset: record old_mems_allowed in struct cpuset
cpuset: introduce effective_{cpumask|nodemask}_cpuset()
cpuset: allow to keep tasks in empty cpusets
cpuset: allow to move tasks to empty cpusets
--
kernel/cpuset.c | 363 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 262 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2013-04-19 12:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-19 12:25 Li Zefan [this message]
2013-04-19 12:25 ` [PATCH 00/10] cpuset: implement sane hierarchy behaviors Li Zefan
[not found] ` <517137A7.4020605-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-19 12:25 ` [PATCH 01/10] cpuset: remove redundant check in cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:25 ` Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:25 ` Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:25 ` [PATCH 02/10] cpuset: cleanup guarantee_online_{cpus|mems}() Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:25 ` Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:26 ` [PATCH 03/10] cpuset: remove unnecessary variable in cpuset_attach() Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:26 ` Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:26 ` Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:26 ` [PATCH 04/10] cpuset: remove cpuset_test_cpumask() Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:26 ` Li Zefan
[not found] ` <517137E7.20505-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-19 18:27 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-19 18:27 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-19 18:27 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-19 12:27 ` [PATCH 05/10] cpuset: don't update tasks' cpumask and nodemask in an empty cpuset Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:27 ` [PATCH 06/10] cpuset: re-structure update_cpumask() a bit Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:27 ` Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:27 ` Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:28 ` [PATCH 07/10] cpuset: record old_mems_allowed in struct cpuset Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:28 ` Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:28 ` Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:28 ` [PATCH 08/10] cpuset: introduce effective_{cpumask|nodemask}_cpuset() Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:28 ` Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:28 ` Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:29 ` [PATCH 09/10] cpuset: allow to keep tasks in empty cpusets Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:29 ` Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:29 ` Li Zefan
[not found] ` <517138A4.3070209-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-19 20:58 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-19 20:58 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20130419205821.GA15543-9pTldWuhBndy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-20 1:22 ` Li Zefan
2013-04-20 1:22 ` Li Zefan
2013-04-20 1:22 ` Li Zefan
[not found] ` <5171EDC1.4070805-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-21 1:41 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-21 1:41 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-19 12:29 ` [PATCH 10/10] cpuset: allow to move tasks to " Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:29 ` Li Zefan
2013-04-19 12:27 ` [PATCH 05/10] cpuset: don't update tasks' cpumask and nodemask in an empty cpuset Li Zefan
[not found] ` <51713819.8050708-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-19 18:36 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-19 18:36 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-19 18:36 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20130419183618.GC13811-9pTldWuhBndy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-20 1:06 ` Li Zefan
2013-04-20 1:06 ` Li Zefan
2013-04-20 1:06 ` Li Zefan
[not found] ` <5171EA24.3070001-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-21 1:42 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-21 1:42 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-21 1:42 ` Tejun Heo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-04-19 12:25 [PATCH 00/10] cpuset: implement sane hierarchy behaviors Li Zefan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=517137A7.4020605@huawei.com \
--to=lizefan-hv44wf8li93qt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.