From: gang.chen@asianux.com (Chen Gang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [Suggestion] ARM64: kernel: compiling issue, need implement cmpxchg64 with assembler language.
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 10:28:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5171FD67.2080104@asianux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201304191412.54601.arnd@arndb.de>
On 2013?04?19? 20:12, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 19 April 2013, Chen Gang wrote:
>> in arch/arm64/include/asm, not define the function cmpxchg64
>>
>> when compiling with allmodconfig,
>> drivers/block/blockconsole.c will need this function.
>>
>> I am not quite familiar with ARM64 (neither ARM64 assembler)
>>
>> can any member helps to send related patch ?
>> if no one have time to send related patch, I should try.
>> and I am glad to try, but need additional time resources,
>> if I try, I should finish it within this month (2013-4-30).
>>
>> welcome any suggestions or completions.
>
> cmpxchg64 is the same as cmpxchg on 64-bit platforms, can't the
> driver be changed to use the latter?
>
> Arnd
>
>
can we be sure that cmpxchg64 is equal to cmpchg on all 64-bit platforms ?
(I guess, the driver may need cross multiple platforms)
(it seems, under x86, s390, better use cmpxchg64, at least they define it).
whether we can be sure or not,
I still prefer to define the macro cmpxchg64 just the alias of cmpxchg.
(and I also guess ARM64 is always on 64-bit platform)
the related patch may be like below.
-------------------------------patch begin--------------------------------------
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
index 968b5cb..b572d2b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
@@ -170,4 +170,6 @@ static inline unsigned long __cmpxchg_mb(volatile void *ptr, unsigned long old,
(unsigned long)(n), \
sizeof(*(ptr))))
+#define cmpxchg64(ptr,o,n) cmpxchg((ptr),(o),(n))
+
#endif /* __ASM_CMPXCHG_H */
-------------------------------patch end----------------------------------------
I think, we can also reference the implementation of s390:
it is in arch/s390/include/asm/cmpxchg.h.
since we are ARM64, excluding ARM(32,16...), we can only consider 64-bit.
if in the future, ARM64 and ARM are merged together:
we can use CONFIG_64BIT to switch the cmpxchg64 definition.
if define CONFIG_64BIT, use cmpxchg instead of cmpxchg64.
else, use the definition of ARM (arch/arm/include/asm/cmpxchg.h already defines cmpxchg64)
-------------------------------reference begin----------------------------------
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
#define cmpxchg64(ptr, o, n) \
({ \
cmpxchg((ptr), (o), (n)); \
})
#else /* CONFIG_64BIT */
...
-------------------------------reference end------------------------------------
:-)
--
Chen Gang
Asianux Corporation
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
"olof@lixom.net" <olof@lixom.net>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Suggestion] ARM64: kernel: compiling issue, need implement cmpxchg64 with assembler language.
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 10:28:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5171FD67.2080104@asianux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201304191412.54601.arnd@arndb.de>
On 2013年04月19日 20:12, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 19 April 2013, Chen Gang wrote:
>> in arch/arm64/include/asm, not define the function cmpxchg64
>>
>> when compiling with allmodconfig,
>> drivers/block/blockconsole.c will need this function.
>>
>> I am not quite familiar with ARM64 (neither ARM64 assembler)
>>
>> can any member helps to send related patch ?
>> if no one have time to send related patch, I should try.
>> and I am glad to try, but need additional time resources,
>> if I try, I should finish it within this month (2013-4-30).
>>
>> welcome any suggestions or completions.
>
> cmpxchg64 is the same as cmpxchg on 64-bit platforms, can't the
> driver be changed to use the latter?
>
> Arnd
>
>
can we be sure that cmpxchg64 is equal to cmpchg on all 64-bit platforms ?
(I guess, the driver may need cross multiple platforms)
(it seems, under x86, s390, better use cmpxchg64, at least they define it).
whether we can be sure or not,
I still prefer to define the macro cmpxchg64 just the alias of cmpxchg.
(and I also guess ARM64 is always on 64-bit platform)
the related patch may be like below.
-------------------------------patch begin--------------------------------------
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
index 968b5cb..b572d2b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
@@ -170,4 +170,6 @@ static inline unsigned long __cmpxchg_mb(volatile void *ptr, unsigned long old,
(unsigned long)(n), \
sizeof(*(ptr))))
+#define cmpxchg64(ptr,o,n) cmpxchg((ptr),(o),(n))
+
#endif /* __ASM_CMPXCHG_H */
-------------------------------patch end----------------------------------------
I think, we can also reference the implementation of s390:
it is in arch/s390/include/asm/cmpxchg.h.
since we are ARM64, excluding ARM(32,16...), we can only consider 64-bit.
if in the future, ARM64 and ARM are merged together:
we can use CONFIG_64BIT to switch the cmpxchg64 definition.
if define CONFIG_64BIT, use cmpxchg instead of cmpxchg64.
else, use the definition of ARM (arch/arm/include/asm/cmpxchg.h already defines cmpxchg64)
-------------------------------reference begin----------------------------------
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
#define cmpxchg64(ptr, o, n) \
({ \
cmpxchg((ptr), (o), (n)); \
})
#else /* CONFIG_64BIT */
...
-------------------------------reference end------------------------------------
:-)
--
Chen Gang
Asianux Corporation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-20 2:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-19 11:45 [Suggestion] ARM64: kernel: compiling issue, need implement cmpxchg64 with assembler language Chen Gang
2013-04-19 11:45 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-19 12:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-19 12:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-20 2:28 ` Chen Gang [this message]
2013-04-20 2:28 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-20 7:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-20 7:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-22 5:08 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-22 5:08 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-22 5:08 ` [PATCH] ARM64: kernel: compiling issue, define cmpxchg64 and cmpxchg64_local for outside using Chen Gang
2013-04-22 5:08 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-23 10:48 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-04-23 10:48 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-04-23 10:54 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-23 10:54 ` Chen Gang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5171FD67.2080104@asianux.com \
--to=gang.chen@asianux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.